Re: Life is a Terminal Illness
Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2022 3:09 pm
For the discussion of all things philosophical, especially articles in the magazine Philosophy Now.
https://forum.philosophynow.org/
You have made it quite familiar.
Age wrote: ↑Thu Mar 17, 2022 10:37 am1. To me, there is NOT so-called "mathematical oddity" here AT ALL.trokanmariel wrote: ↑Wed Mar 16, 2022 2:54 pmAge wrote: ↑Wed Mar 16, 2022 5:51 am
What do the words 'daytime' and 'nighttime' refer to, this time?
Last time I asked you for 'clarity' about how you define the 'daylight' word, and you informed us that 'it' refers to an 'infinite system'. However, this time if I use 'your definition' here this is making LESS SENSE than before.
Of course when planets move in relation to a star, then what occurs is 'what 'you', human beings (or robots), call' 'daytime and nighttime'. But, so what?
The so-called 'system' 'of distinction' just happens and occurs within a brain.
There IS 'movement', and, 'movement' is 'movement', and, of course, without 'movement' there is no 'life'. But, again, so what?
When you say, 'life', are you referring to those little insignificant 'things', like; trees, animals, including the human ones, planets, and stars, and even robots, which ALL have a 'beginning' and an 'end', in a sense?
If yes, then what has this 'life' got to do with the eternal 'Life', which does NOT 'begin' and did NOT 'end'?
The two, by the way, are NOT the 'same' 'living systems'. They BOTH in or with the One and ONLY eternal 'Life-system', but they are NOT the 'same'.
By daytime and nighttime, I refer to the white and black colour scheme, of the skyline, as and when the planet revolves around the sun.
The idiosyncrasy, regarding the system of planets and the sun, and the universe, is that planets have to move in order to establish the difference of white to black, and movement is movement indeed; all movement is life.
Humanity is the inevitable source, of the planetary movement, not humanity on Earth, of course, but ancient humanity, original humanity, and the point is that because of this link, between humanity and movement, it is essential that humanity on Earth creates a loop of start and stop which isn't a never-ending loop, as the current system of the link between the two (the loop of start and stop concept and the never-ending loop concept) is a mathematical oddity.
2. When I SEE or HEAR the word 'humanity', then I think of those 'things' that are known as and called, 'human beings'. Now, what do the words 'not humanity of Earth' MEAN or REFER TO, EXACTLY?
3. HOW, EXACTLY, is 'humanity', itself, the INEVITABLE 'source' of the MOVEMENT of ALL planets?
But the 'bad thoughts' do NOT in each case and always 'contaminate' the 'good thoughts'. That is; once one KNOWS HOW to be in FULL CONTROL.Walker wrote: ↑Thu Mar 17, 2022 1:26 pmBecause, folks have an inherent tendency to organize, put into order, classify, label, taxonomize, fit into a hierarchy of importance, and do all kinds of other things to thoughts that show up unannounced, and often unwelcome.
Plus, the inherent tendency to control everything that lies this side of the perception horizon supplies the motive force required to try and control the bad thoughts that invariably contaminate the good.
But a so-called "rancher" just does what they do, to obtain MORE MONEY, so they are doing, what they do, for the 'bad thought' of GREED.Dontaskme wrote: ↑Thu Mar 17, 2022 12:01 pm This tendency to corral bad thoughts is like a rancher who lives on the range and would like to seldom hear a discouraging word. The tendency is similar because ranchers like to keep the wild mustangs away from the good horses. The bad horse might mount the good, or the good might mount the bad, and all that mounting has implications. So the rancher can’t help but activate that control tendency, ‘cause doing so is the root of what makes him a rancher.
BUT EVERY very young child KNOWS 'bad thoughts' can be unruly. This is a given. 'you', human beings, however, in the days when this was being written, had NOT YET LEARNED how to DISTINGUISH between what were Truly 'bad thoughts' from Truly 'good thoughts'. In fact, some of the Truly 'bad thoughts' some of 'you' THOUGHT were 'good thoughts'. Like for just one example alone, the thought, "It is good to spoil our children" or "We need to spoil our children", is a Truly 'bad thought', but some of 'you' just could NOT SEE and RECOGNIZE just how Bad and Wrong that 'thought' REALLY WAS and IS.
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Thu Mar 17, 2022 12:01 pm They can inflate beyond proportion, and they not only resist being controlled, they can’t be forgotten, although as mentioned they can be controlled Western-style, namely, numbed and then suppressed for awhile with external additives that were probably first discovered in conjunction with the first “I” to arise.
However, other methods that subtract from the load don’t involve the Western method of additives, or programming Oblivion into the destination option of the GPS navigation system.
But, 'with ALL 'things' considered, this is NOT the 'conclusion' REACHED.
Could it just be the Mind, Itself, which is what the 'Thing' IS, which is the 'portal' that 'enables' relationships between, apparently 'separated', 'things'?Walker wrote: ↑Thu Mar 17, 2022 2:03 pm the innate capacity of humans,
and the innate capacity of humans modified
by limitations corrupting that capacity,
whether those limitations be self-inflicted
or from an outside source
such as trauma.
The mind-thingy is the portal of capacity both corrupted and pristine which enables a particular human to access Mind on the human frequency … and enables any other thing to access Mind through the Any-Other-Thing Portal. Important to keep in mind, every particular portal is a particular access allocation of the same Mind. Some of these allocations are shared, which enables inter-species relationships.
WHY do 'you' SEEM to have an 'issue' with just LISTENING to what "OTHERS" have to say, and just 'considering' 'that' for even a slight moment "dontaskme"?
You do NOT have to STOP and just CONSIDER what "others" say and share "dontaskme", but it SEEMS very HYPOCRITICAL to EXPECT "others" LISTEN to 'you' and FOLLOW what 'you' SAY and SHARE.
Okay, now we are getting "somewhere".trokanmariel wrote: ↑Thu Mar 17, 2022 5:57 pmAge wrote: ↑Thu Mar 17, 2022 10:37 am1. To me, there is NOT so-called "mathematical oddity" here AT ALL.trokanmariel wrote: ↑Wed Mar 16, 2022 2:54 pm
By daytime and nighttime, I refer to the white and black colour scheme, of the skyline, as and when the planet revolves around the sun.
The idiosyncrasy, regarding the system of planets and the sun, and the universe, is that planets have to move in order to establish the difference of white to black, and movement is movement indeed; all movement is life.
Humanity is the inevitable source, of the planetary movement, not humanity on Earth, of course, but ancient humanity, original humanity, and the point is that because of this link, between humanity and movement, it is essential that humanity on Earth creates a loop of start and stop which isn't a never-ending loop, as the current system of the link between the two (the loop of start and stop concept and the never-ending loop concept) is a mathematical oddity.
2. When I SEE or HEAR the word 'humanity', then I think of those 'things' that are known as and called, 'human beings'. Now, what do the words 'not humanity of Earth' MEAN or REFER TO, EXACTLY?
3. HOW, EXACTLY, is 'humanity', itself, the INEVITABLE 'source' of the MOVEMENT of ALL planets?
Original humanity, or ancient humanity, refers to humans or human-looking beings that pre-date the universe.
Okay.trokanmariel wrote: ↑Thu Mar 17, 2022 5:57 pm Human-looking beings are the inevitable source, of planet movement (here comes my Master of Evil moment), because of the convergence of the top-down-left-to-right logic system with the white to black system of the sun uses top-down to enact white to black
I was guided, by JCVD's Frank Dux, during this
This is OBVIOUSLY False, Wrong, AND Incorrect. This is because thee One that KNOWS It IS ALIVE is thee one and ONLY One, which, OBVIOUSLY, lives ALWAYS and FOREVER, as it is ONLY 'I' who, and what, is eternal AND infinite.
Except, OBVIOUSLY, the ETERNAL Life, known as thee Universe, or Existence, Itself.
Just as some of the words that 'you', human beings SAY and WRITE. As can be CLEARLY SEEN and PROVED True above.
Gary Childress wrote: ↑Sat Mar 05, 2022 12:08 pm Once you've seen the ugliness at the heart of existence, you never unsee it. You are scarred for life.