Philosophy Now Forum

Darkneos wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2023 8:03 pm

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2023 7:57 pm

Darkneos wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2023 7:47 pm

Wrong again.

What’s your point?

If meaning is assigned and meaning is relative and subjective (as you claim) then in many respects I am right.

Now you are doing the same thing you accuse me of...repeating.

Wrong again, what’s your point.

That is your subjective state (if meaning is subjective according to you).

There is 'just is-ness'.

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2023 8:05 pm

Darkneos wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2023 8:03 pm

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2023 7:57 pm

If meaning is assigned and meaning is relative and subjective (as you claim) then in many respects I am right.

Now you are doing the same thing you accuse me of...repeating.

Wrong again, what’s your point.

That is your subjective state (if meaning is subjective according to you).

There is 'just is-ness'.

Wrong again. What’s your point.

Darkneos wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2023 8:10 pm

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2023 8:05 pm

Darkneos wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2023 8:03 pm
Wrong again, what’s your point.

That is your subjective state (if meaning is subjective according to you).

There is 'just is-ness'.

Wrong again. What’s your point.

Why does there have to be a point?

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2023 8:11 pm

Darkneos wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2023 8:10 pm

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2023 8:05 pm

That is your subjective state (if meaning is subjective according to you).

There is 'just is-ness'.

Wrong again. What’s your point.

Why does there have to be a point?

Wrong again. What’s your point.

It’s not God’s Wisdom and Nature’s Understanding. There’s a pattern. There’s a thing-in-itself beyond perception, Wisdom, but there’s no thing-in-itself beyond pattern. There’s no God.

There’s no Eternal Ideas because we can imagine it’s Symbolic/Real. It’s not Imaginary/Symbolic/Real because we can imagine it’s multiple. It’s not multiple because it’s a body-without-organs. Its formless.

There’s a pattern even if there’s no thing-in-itself. There’s a pattern in the thing-in-itself because otherwise it’s solipsism. There’s no pattern because it’s formless. If there both is and isn’t a pattern it’s Being and Nothingness.

I define Nothing as the opposite of Something ( something being defined as having space ( which is three dimensional in and of its self ) and with physical three dimensional objects .

nothing has none . no space nor anything physical . which means that nothing can never be , exist , for infinity . therefore nothing is not in all things .