Page 5 of 6
Re: The constructivist animosity against the law of the excluded middle
Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2024 2:38 pm
by Atla
Skepdick wrote: ↑Sun Mar 10, 2024 12:40 pm
Atla wrote: ↑Sun Mar 10, 2024 11:44 am
Yes we are uncertain if the number of stars is odd or even.
So when you said that the universe is a "certain" way you lied?
You seem uncertain about which certain way the universe is.
word salad
Re: The constructivist animosity against the law of the excluded middle
Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2024 2:41 pm
by Skepdick
Atla wrote: ↑Sun Mar 10, 2024 2:38 pm
Skepdick wrote: ↑Sun Mar 10, 2024 12:40 pm
Atla wrote: ↑Sun Mar 10, 2024 11:44 am
Yes we are uncertain if the number of stars is odd or even.
So when you said that the universe is a "certain" way you lied?
You seem uncertain about which certain way the universe is.
word salad
I can only explain it to you - I can't understand it for you, salad brain.
You don't even know which universe you live in.
Maybe it's one of the universes with an even number of stars.
Maybe it's one of the universes with an odd number of stars.
Re: The constructivist animosity against the law of the excluded middle
Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2024 2:49 pm
by Atla
Skepdick wrote: ↑Sun Mar 10, 2024 2:41 pm
Atla wrote: ↑Sun Mar 10, 2024 2:38 pm
Skepdick wrote: ↑Sun Mar 10, 2024 12:40 pm
So when you said that the universe is a "certain" way you lied?
You seem uncertain about which certain way the universe is.
word salad
I can only explain it to you - I can't understand it for you, salad brain.
You don't even know which universe you live in.
Maybe it's one of the universes with an even number of stars.
Maybe it's one of the universes with an odd number of stars.
In which case the LEM works, you're even explaining it now with your own words.
Re: The constructivist animosity against the law of the excluded middle
Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2024 2:54 pm
by Skepdick
Atla wrote: ↑Sun Mar 10, 2024 2:49 pm
Skepdick wrote: ↑Sun Mar 10, 2024 2:41 pm
Atla wrote: ↑Sun Mar 10, 2024 2:38 pm
word salad
I can only explain it to you - I can't understand it for you, salad brain.
You don't even know which universe you live in.
Maybe it's one of the universes with an even number of stars.
Maybe it's one of the universes with an odd number of stars.
In which case the LEM works, you're even explaining it now with your own words.
Which case is the case in which LEM works?
You can't seem to decide.
Re: The constructivist animosity against the law of the excluded middle
Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2024 3:44 pm
by Atla
Skepdick wrote: ↑Sun Mar 10, 2024 2:54 pm
Atla wrote: ↑Sun Mar 10, 2024 2:49 pm
Skepdick wrote: ↑Sun Mar 10, 2024 2:41 pm
I can only explain it to you - I can't understand it for you, salad brain.
You don't even know which universe you live in.
Maybe it's one of the universes with an even number of stars.
Maybe it's one of the universes with an odd number of stars.
In which case the LEM works, you're even explaining it now with your own words.
Which case is the case in which LEM works?
You can't seem to decide.
Both, that's why it works.
Re: The constructivist animosity against the law of the excluded middle
Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2024 3:50 pm
by Skepdick
Atla wrote: ↑Sun Mar 10, 2024 3:44 pm
Skepdick wrote: ↑Sun Mar 10, 2024 2:54 pm
Atla wrote: ↑Sun Mar 10, 2024 2:49 pm
In which case the LEM works, you're even explaining it now with your own words.
Which case is the case in which LEM works?
You can't seem to decide.
Both, that's why it works.
Which case is
THE case?
Both.
Skepdick wrote: ↑Sat Mar 09, 2024 2:13 pm
Shame, you seem to have confused yourself on your (non?)dualism.
Re: The constructivist animosity against the law of the excluded middle
Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2024 4:06 pm
by Atla
Skepdick wrote: ↑Sun Mar 10, 2024 3:50 pm
Atla wrote: ↑Sun Mar 10, 2024 3:44 pm
Skepdick wrote: ↑Sun Mar 10, 2024 2:54 pm
Which case is the case in which LEM works?
You can't seem to decide.
Both, that's why it works.
Which case is
THE case?
Both.
Skepdick wrote: ↑Sat Mar 09, 2024 2:13 pm
Shame, you seem to have confused yourself on your (non?)dualism.
I don't think you know what the LEM even is.
Re: The constructivist animosity against the law of the excluded middle
Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2024 4:15 pm
by Skepdick
Atla wrote: ↑Sun Mar 10, 2024 4:06 pm
I don't think you know what the LEM even is.
I don't think you know anything.
You can't even produce the witness which determines whether the number of stars is odd or even.
Re: The constructivist animosity against the law of the excluded middle
Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2024 6:48 pm
by Atla
Skepdick wrote: ↑Sun Mar 10, 2024 4:15 pm
Atla wrote: ↑Sun Mar 10, 2024 4:06 pm
I don't think you know what the LEM even is.
I don't think you know anything.
You can't even produce the witness which determines whether the number of stars is odd or even.
Maybe if we did ECT on you.. hmm..
Re: The constructivist animosity against the law of the excluded middle
Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2024 6:56 pm
by Skepdick
Atla wrote: ↑Sun Mar 10, 2024 6:48 pm
Maybe if we did ECT on you.. hmm..
Then I might become as dumb and disoriented as you.
Re: The constructivist animosity against the law of the excluded middle
Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2024 7:19 pm
by Atla
Skepdick wrote: ↑Sun Mar 10, 2024 6:56 pm
Atla wrote: ↑Sun Mar 10, 2024 6:48 pm
Maybe if we did ECT on you.. hmm..
Then I might become as dumb and disoriented as you.
Or maybe send you to Asia and have you eat cooked monkey brains.. maybe you could reach the level of monkeys then..
Re: The constructivist animosity against the law of the excluded middle
Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2024 8:29 pm
by Skepdick
Atla wrote: ↑Sun Mar 10, 2024 7:19 pm
Or maybe send you to Asia and have you eat cooked monkey brains.. maybe you could reach the level of monkeys then..
Is that how you leveled up to where you are now?
Re: The constructivist animosity against the law of the excluded middle
Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2024 5:44 am
by Atla
Skepdick wrote: ↑Sun Mar 10, 2024 8:29 pm
Atla wrote: ↑Sun Mar 10, 2024 7:19 pm
Or maybe send you to Asia and have you eat cooked monkey brains.. maybe you could reach the level of monkeys then..
Is that how you leveled up to where you are now?
No but maybe you could. Hmm or we could attach a lightning-rod to your head and wait for a storm.. maybe that would do the trick, set things in motion..
Re: The constructivist animosity against the law of the excluded middle
Posted: Tue Mar 12, 2024 8:45 am
by Skepdick
Atla wrote: ↑Mon Mar 11, 2024 5:44 am
Skepdick wrote: ↑Sun Mar 10, 2024 8:29 pm
Atla wrote: ↑Sun Mar 10, 2024 7:19 pm
Or maybe send you to Asia and have you eat cooked monkey brains.. maybe you could reach the level of monkeys then..
Is that how you leveled up to where you are now?
No but maybe you could. Hmm or we could attach a lightning-rod to your head and wait for a storm.. maybe that would do the trick, set things in motion..
You want me to level down to where you are now? That's just spiteful.
Re: The constructivist animosity against the law of the excluded middle
Posted: Tue Mar 12, 2024 3:28 pm
by Atla
Skepdick wrote: ↑Tue Mar 12, 2024 8:45 am
Atla wrote: ↑Mon Mar 11, 2024 5:44 am
Skepdick wrote: ↑Sun Mar 10, 2024 8:29 pm
Is that how you leveled up to where you are now?
No but maybe you could. Hmm or we could attach a lightning-rod to your head and wait for a storm.. maybe that would do the trick, set things in motion..
You want me to level down to where you are now? That's just spiteful.
Was also thinking of going to CERN... maybe if we would put your head into the beam, you could get enlightened in a very literal sense..