Morality: To Wittgenstein Pure Realism is Solipsism

Should you think about your duty, or about the consequences of your actions? Or should you concentrate on becoming a good person?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Atla
Posts: 7041
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2017 8:27 am

Re: Morality: To Wittgenstein Pure Realism is Solipsism

Post by Atla »

Veritas Aequitas wrote: Fri Jul 14, 2023 6:11 am
Atla wrote: Mon Jul 10, 2023 2:28 pm...
Denying even the possibility of noumena = only "my" appearances exist in this very moment, and there's nothing else. Not only is that solipsism, but it's a solipsism where even "my" past and future don't exist, and nothing can make any sense anyway.
It's a completely nonsensical philosophy.


Strawman!!
I had posted this a '1000' times.
Reality: Emergence & Realization Prior to Perceiving [appearances], Knowing & Describing
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=40145

I have never claimed "only "my" appearances exist in this very moment".

Before anything is an 'appearance' that thing has to emerge and realized before it is cognized as 'appearances' 'perceived', known and described. [see above thread]
That emerged, realized and real thing is conditioned upon a human-based Framework and System of Realization [FSR] before it is known via the FSK.
Because it is human-based it cannot be the logical object 'noumenon' which is a thing-by-itself or thing-in-itself.
...
Undecipherable word salad to me
Post Reply