Philosophy Now Forum

Age wrote: ↑Thu Mar 23, 2023 9:54 am 1. NO one that I KNOW OF, but you, SUPPOSEDLY, KNOWS when 'it' refers to. AND, you will NOT inform us of WHEN 'it' WAS. But, if ANY one else DOES KNOW, then WILL you INFORM us?

So you don't know WHEN it refers to but you know WHAT it refers to? That's impossible.

A what today and a what yesterday are not the same what.

Age wrote: ↑Thu Mar 23, 2023 9:54 am 2. I am ASKING, FOR CLARIFICATION.

Why do you need clarity if you already know what I am talking about?

Age wrote: ↑Thu Mar 23, 2023 9:56 am WHEN did I, supposedly, say, 'we all know'?

Right then

Age wrote: ↑Thu Mar 23, 2023 9:42 am we all KNOW what that refers to.

Age wrote: ↑Thu Mar 23, 2023 9:56 am WHAT are you referring to here, EXACTLY?

Right that.

Age wrote: ↑Thu Mar 23, 2023 9:42 am we all KNOW what that refers to.

Age wrote: ↑Thu Mar 23, 2023 9:42 am What WILL BE FOUND, if you are Honest, is that you will be Wrong more than 99.99%.

100% of the time I am honest all the time.

Skepdick wrote: ↑Thu Mar 23, 2023 9:57 am

Age wrote: ↑Thu Mar 23, 2023 9:54 am 1. NO one that I KNOW OF, but you, SUPPOSEDLY, KNOWS when 'it' refers to. AND, you will NOT inform us of WHEN 'it' WAS. But, if ANY one else DOES KNOW, then WILL you INFORM us?

So you don't know WHEN it refers to but you know WHAT it refers to? That's impossible.

LOL As I IMPLIED in the reply BEFORE this one you have NO idea NOR clue as to what 'it' IS, EXACTLY, that I WAS REFERRING TO.

So, as USUAL this one, like ALL of the "OTHER" adults, in the days when this WAS being written, WOULD MAKE ASSUMPTIONS, JUMP TO CONCLUSIONS, BEFORE they would even CONSIDER just FINDING OUT, the CLARIFICATION.

Skepdick wrote: ↑Thu Mar 23, 2023 9:57 am A what today and a what yesterday are not the same what.

If you SAY SO.

But considering that this has absolutely NOTHING AT ALL to do with what I was talking about it is REALLY just MOOT.

Skepdick wrote: ↑Thu Mar 23, 2023 9:57 am

Age wrote: ↑Thu Mar 23, 2023 9:54 am 2. I am ASKING, FOR CLARIFICATION.

Why do you need clarity if you already know what I am talking about?

But I DO NOT KNOW what you were/are talking ABOUT?

What MADE you ASSUME and CONCLUDE such a thing as this?

Skepdick wrote: ↑Thu Mar 23, 2023 9:58 am

Age wrote: ↑Thu Mar 23, 2023 9:56 am WHEN did I, supposedly, say, 'we all know'?

Right then

Age wrote: ↑Thu Mar 23, 2023 9:42 am we all KNOW what that refers to.

Age wrote: ↑Thu Mar 23, 2023 9:56 am WHAT are you referring to here, EXACTLY?

Right that.

Age wrote: ↑Thu Mar 23, 2023 9:42 am we all KNOW what that refers to.

BUT, what did the 'that' word refer to, EXACTLY?

This is WHAT I WAS talking ABOUT when I SAID if you were Honest, then you will be Wrong more than 99.99%.

Skepdick wrote: ↑Thu Mar 23, 2023 9:58 am

Age wrote: ↑Thu Mar 23, 2023 9:42 am What WILL BE FOUND, if you are Honest, is that you will be Wrong more than 99.99%.

100% of the time I am honest all the time.

Besides BEING Wrong in relation to 'what' I was TALKING ABOUT and REFERRING TO, this one is SHOWING and PROVING how 'it' LIES.

Age wrote: ↑Thu Mar 23, 2023 10:11 am Besides BEING Wrong in relation to 'what' I was TALKING ABOUT and REFERRING TO, this one is SHOWING and PROVING how 'it' LIES.

So stop being wrong and stop lying.

Skepdick wrote: ↑Thu Mar 23, 2023 10:13 am

Age wrote: ↑Thu Mar 23, 2023 10:11 am Besides BEING Wrong in relation to 'what' I was TALKING ABOUT and REFERRING TO, this one is SHOWING and PROVING how 'it' LIES.

So stop being wrong and stop lying.

OKAY, IF this is what you BELIEVE is happening and occurring here, then this MUST BE what is HAPPENING, to you.

Age wrote: ↑Thu Mar 23, 2023 10:17 am OKAY, IF this is what you BELIEVE is happening and occurring here, then this MUST BE what is HAPPENING, to you.

If you believe that I have beliefs then you just keep demonstrating that you are wrong.

Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Thu Mar 16, 2023 9:22 am PH and gang do not realize their insistence there are no moral facts, no moral objectivity, i.e. no Moral Normativity, except there are is only Moral Relativism is 'SELF-REFUTING'.

The fact is;
"PH's insistence, there are no moral facts, no moral objectivity, no Moral Realism i.e. no Moral Normativity, except there are is only Moral Relativism"
is itself an ought and normativity, i.e. a epistemic normativity.

Are you going to try to substantiate that claim, or are you just blowing hot air as per usual?

Skepdick wrote: ↑Thu Mar 23, 2023 10:20 am

Age wrote: ↑Thu Mar 23, 2023 10:17 am OKAY, IF this is what you BELIEVE is happening and occurring here, then this MUST BE what is HAPPENING, to you.

If you believe that I have beliefs then you just keep demonstrating that you are wrong.

But I do NOT BELIEVE that and have NEVER BELIEVED that.

Now, do you want to go back to 'what' we WERE taking ABOUT, or NOT?

Age wrote: ↑Thu Mar 23, 2023 10:50 am

Skepdick wrote: ↑Thu Mar 23, 2023 10:20 am

Age wrote: ↑Thu Mar 23, 2023 10:17 am OKAY, IF this is what you BELIEVE is happening and occurring here, then this MUST BE what is HAPPENING, to you.

If you believe that I have beliefs then you just keep demonstrating that you are wrong.

But I do NOT BELIEVE that and have NEVER BELIEVED that.

Now, do you want to go back to 'what' we WERE taking ABOUT, or NOT?

No. I just want you to shut up.

Skepdick wrote: ↑Thu Mar 23, 2023 10:57 am

Age wrote: ↑Thu Mar 23, 2023 10:50 am

Skepdick wrote: ↑Thu Mar 23, 2023 10:20 am
If you believe that I have beliefs then you just keep demonstrating that you are wrong.

But I do NOT BELIEVE that and have NEVER BELIEVED that.

Now, do you want to go back to 'what' we WERE taking ABOUT, or NOT?

No. I just want you to shut up.

And I just WANT you to CLARIFY some QUESTIONS. BUT, we do NOT ALWAYS GET what we WANT, right?

Age wrote: ↑Thu Mar 23, 2023 10:59 am

Skepdick wrote: ↑Thu Mar 23, 2023 10:57 am

Age wrote: ↑Thu Mar 23, 2023 10:50 am

But I do NOT BELIEVE that and have NEVER BELIEVED that.

Now, do you want to go back to 'what' we WERE taking ABOUT, or NOT?

No. I just want you to shut up.

And I just WANT you to CLARIFY some QUESTIONS. BUT, we do NOT ALWAYS GET what we WANT, right?

Sometimes we don't.
Sometimes we do.

Lets make your shutting up one of the latter?

Skepdick wrote: ↑Thu Mar 23, 2023 11:12 am

Age wrote: ↑Thu Mar 23, 2023 10:59 am

Skepdick wrote: ↑Thu Mar 23, 2023 10:57 am
No. I just want you to shut up.

And I just WANT you to CLARIFY some QUESTIONS. BUT, we do NOT ALWAYS GET what we WANT, right?

Sometimes we don't.
Sometimes we do.

Lets make your shutting up one of the latter?

EXACTLY AS I SAID, we do NOT ALWAYS get what we want.

Also, WHY do you NOT like it when your inconsistent and/or contradictory views are just POINTED OUT and SHOWN?

your attempts at DEFLECTION here just reinforces how Wrong and Incorrect those views of yours are, EXACTLY.

Age wrote: ↑Fri Mar 24, 2023 2:12 am

Skepdick wrote: ↑Thu Mar 23, 2023 11:12 am

Age wrote: ↑Thu Mar 23, 2023 10:59 am

And I just WANT you to CLARIFY some QUESTIONS. BUT, we do NOT ALWAYS GET what we WANT, right?

Sometimes we don't.
Sometimes we do.

Lets make your shutting up one of the latter?

EXACTLY AS I SAID, we do NOT ALWAYS get what we want.

There you go... lying again.

Age wrote: ↑Fri Mar 24, 2023 2:12 am Also, WHY do you NOT like it when your inconsistent and/or contradictory views are just POINTED OUT and SHOWN?

There you go. Lying again. Of course I like it when inconsistent and/or contradictory views are pointed out and shown.

That is precisely why I am pointing out and showing your contradictory views. Because I like it.

Age wrote: ↑Fri Mar 24, 2023 2:12 am your attempts at DEFLECTION here just reinforces how Wrong and Incorrect those views of yours are, EXACTLY.

Another lie.

Is the Aurum Lex relevant in any way?