Philosophy Now Forum

Hobbes' Choice wrote: ↑Tue Sep 26, 2017 9:38 pm The interpretations of the Bible are legion. Other Christian Theists do not accept much of the Bible as anything to do with God's message at all.

I'm sorry, but those ignorant sloths have never read the book of Revelation or "The Ouzo Prophecy."

Hobbes' Choice wrote: ↑Tue Sep 26, 2017 9:38 pm As for YOUR view of god? Why should I think that is nay better than any go the others.

I don't expect you to nor do I ask you to. I'm just telling you what I know.

Hobbes' Choice wrote: ↑Sun Sep 24, 2017 9:46 pm You might also want to consider the possibility that if you think god (whatever the fuck that is) created humanity then humanity's failure is god's failure to create a being capable of reading god.

But that's what you don't understand. God doesn't wish for us to be able to understand all of him, or if he does, he wants those who really seek the understanding to be the ones to find it. What's the point of just giving us the knowledge beforehand? There'd be nothing for us to do whole we're here!
Gko cannot fail at creating anything as that is in the definition of who he is. In this context, he has chosen not to give us all the answers despite that fact.

God and Allah were created by Man in His own image. That is why the Abrahamic deities are entirely focused on human morality.

Any universal entity is not going to have the slightest interest in human morals, which are merely the ever-evolving rules of engagement adopted by intelligent social species. It's not as though we judge the performance of our bodies' microbes. As professionals we trust each other to do our jobs :)

bobevenson wrote: ↑Tue Sep 26, 2017 10:32 pm

Hobbes' Choice wrote: ↑Tue Sep 26, 2017 9:38 pm The interpretations of the Bible are legion. Other Christian Theists do not accept much of the Bible as anything to do with God's message at all.

I'm sorry, but those ignorant sloths have never read the book of Revelation or "The Ouzo Prophecy."

Idiot!

thedoc wrote: ↑Tue Sep 26, 2017 10:37 pm

Hobbes' Choice wrote: ↑Tue Sep 26, 2017 9:38 pm As for YOUR view of god? Why should I think that is nay better than any go the others.

I don't expect you to nor do I ask you to. I'm just telling you what I know.

You "know" shit. Your claim is as good as Bob Evenson.

Vendetta wrote: ↑Thu Sep 28, 2017 3:08 am

Hobbes' Choice wrote: ↑Sun Sep 24, 2017 9:46 pm You might also want to consider the possibility that if you think god (whatever the fuck that is) created humanity then humanity's failure is god's failure to create a being capable of reading god.

But that's what you don't understand. God doesn't wish for us to be able to understand all of him, or if he does, he wants those who really seek the understanding to be the ones to find it. What's the point of just giving us the knowledge beforehand? There'd be nothing for us to do whole we're here!
Gko cannot fail at creating anything as that is in the definition of who he is. In this context, he has chosen not to give us all the answers despite that fact.

Yet another moron on the site that can read the mind of God!!!
You are not only a fool, you are an arrogant fool.


“And do you think that unto such as you
A maggot-minded, starved, fanatic crew
God gave a secret, and denied it me?
Well, well—what matters it? Believe that, too!”


― Omar Khayyám, Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam

Hobbes' Choice wrote: ↑Thu Sep 28, 2017 1:29 pm

thedoc wrote: ↑Tue Sep 26, 2017 10:37 pm

Hobbes' Choice wrote: ↑Tue Sep 26, 2017 9:38 pm As for YOUR view of god? Why should I think that is nay better than any go the others.

I don't expect you to nor do I ask you to. I'm just telling you what I know.

You "know" shit. Your claim is as good as Bob Evenson.

Just because you don't know it, doesn't mean that I or someone else doesn't know it. It's similar to the Argument from incredulity.

thedoc wrote: ↑Thu Sep 28, 2017 7:08 pm

Hobbes' Choice wrote: ↑Thu Sep 28, 2017 1:29 pm

thedoc wrote: ↑Tue Sep 26, 2017 10:37 pm

I don't expect you to nor do I ask you to. I'm just telling you what I know.

You "know" shit. Your claim is as good as Bob Evenson.

Just because you don't know it, doesn't mean that I or someone else doesn't know it. It's similar to the Argument from incredulity.

Knowing is based on evidence. You know shit.
You ought to be ashamed of yourself for such delusion.

Hobbes' Choice wrote: ↑Thu Sep 28, 2017 7:42 pm

thedoc wrote: ↑Thu Sep 28, 2017 7:08 pm

Hobbes' Choice wrote: ↑Thu Sep 28, 2017 1:29 pm

You "know" shit. Your claim is as good as Bob Evenson.

Just because you don't know it, doesn't mean that I or someone else doesn't know it. It's similar to the Argument from incredulity.

Knowing is based on evidence. You know shit.
You ought to be ashamed of yourself for such delusion.

Delusions are based on a lack of evidence, so what I know is not a delusion.

thedoc wrote: ↑Thu Sep 28, 2017 8:29 pm

Hobbes' Choice wrote: ↑Thu Sep 28, 2017 7:42 pm

thedoc wrote: ↑Thu Sep 28, 2017 7:08 pm

Just because you don't know it, doesn't mean that I or someone else doesn't know it. It's similar to the Argument from incredulity.

Knowing is based on evidence. You know shit.
You ought to be ashamed of yourself for such delusion.

Delusions are based on a lack of evidence, so what I know is not a delusion.

I have evidence that you are in fact deluded.
You believe in god a thing for which you can have no evidence; a thing for which you can produce no evidence.

God is the light in which I see.

Aka No..thing and everything.

Hobbes' Choice wrote: ↑Thu Sep 28, 2017 11:16 pm

thedoc wrote: ↑Thu Sep 28, 2017 8:29 pm

Hobbes' Choice wrote: ↑Thu Sep 28, 2017 7:42 pm

Knowing is based on evidence. You know shit.
You ought to be ashamed of yourself for such delusion.

Delusions are based on a lack of evidence, so what I know is not a delusion.

I have evidence that you are in fact deluded.

Provide YOUR evidence that there is no God.

Hobbes' Choice wrote:You believe in god a thing for which you can have no evidence; a thing for which you can produce no evidence.

The thing is - God will provide evidence on a personal level to individuals that had some FAITH. Atheists that run around like headless chickens asking for evidence from those that do KNOW it exists should actually comprehend a thing called FAITH, which was simply asked of us from the outset. Atheists will never be given the evidence.
I have provided far more evidence of God than you could ever muster for a contrary argument.

Dontaskme wrote: ↑Fri Sep 29, 2017 10:39 pm God is the light in which I see.

We are PUPILS of the light (apart from the atheists)

attofishpi wrote: ↑Sat Sep 30, 2017 11:09 am

Hobbes' Choice wrote: ↑Thu Sep 28, 2017 11:16 pm I have evidence that you are in fact deluded.

Provide YOUR evidence that there is no God.

No evidence is needed to prove something does not exist.

Hobbes' Choice wrote: ↑Sat Sep 30, 2017 12:03 pm

attofishpi wrote: ↑Sat Sep 30, 2017 11:09 am

Hobbes' Choice wrote: ↑Thu Sep 28, 2017 11:16 pm I have evidence that you are in fact deluded.

Provide YOUR evidence that there is no God.

No evidence is needed to prove something does not exist.

Absolutely there is! Just because you specifically haven't interacted with something or don't believe in it doesn't mean it does not exist. I'm sure there are hundreds of thousands of people that you've never met, but if you were to say that because of that, they don't exist, does that make them not exist? You'd need proof.