Why is slavery wrong?

[Sculptor]

In other words, while within the "horrors" of life, how is it philosophically possible for miserable chattel slaves to create uplifting expressions of spirit? Is it through delusion? Is it delusional to assume they even did that?

In other words, Sculptor is answering the second, err, make that the third question, with a foggy ... Yes.

You DO know that you are quoting yourself??

[henry quirk]

It seems you have failed to use the quote system, attributing words to yourself that were those of others.

I been postin' and quotin' this way for ages, and you just notice now?

I rarely read your posts as they do not often contain anything worth reading.
But I am glad you have acknowledged your failings. Shame you have been at it for so long without learning how to do it properly.

[Sculptor]

I been postin' and quotin' this way for ages, and you just notice now?

I rarely read your posts as they do not often contain anything worth reading.
But I am glad you have acknowledged your failings. Shame you have been at it for so long without learning how to do it properly.

[henry quirk]

I rarely read your posts as they do not often contain anything worth reading.
But I am glad you have acknowledged your failings. Shame you have been at it for so long without learning how to do it properly.

Comrade!

[attofishpi]

In other words, while within the "horrors" of life, how is it philosophically possible for miserable chattel slaves to create uplifting expressions of spirit? Is it through delusion? Is it delusional to assume they even did that?

In other words, Sculptor is answering the second, err, make that the third question, with a foggy ... Yes.

You DO know that you are quoting yourself??

I am getting confused by this entire page pretty much - is Walker actually Henry Quirk (when stoned) ?

[henry quirk]

atto,

is Walker actually Henry Quirk (when stoned) ?

Are you actually lace (drunk)?

[attofishpi]

atto,

is Walker actually Henry Quirk (when stoned) ?

Are you actually lace (drunk)?

LMFAO!!

[henry quirk]

atto,

is Walker actually Henry Quirk (when stoned) ?

Are you actually lace (drunk)?

LMFAO!!

I figured that would tickle you...

[Walker]

You DO know that you are quoting yourself??

In this case, the appropriate question is why.

The answer is because you're a slacker with the quoteables.

[Walker]

Gosh unusually verbose.

It’s a Fredrick Douglass influence from the past caused by transmissions he was receiving from his future and adapting for his time.

In other words, Douglass was in the thick of slavery, so since you’re interested in who knows slaves and how many, read some of his speeches and get to know his mind a bit. Like a real historian would do. Then you can post some mature and relevant commentary that is well within your capacity to do so, while remaining on high alert for new and perhaps surprising insights that could challenge a lifetime of buttressing the known, that is, unless paradigm protections have grown too dense and impenetrable* for objectivity to shine through, in which case new insights won't get past the sneer or the leer, and into the noggin.


* It's an age-related condition called ossification that keeps the noggin from exploding.

[attofishpi]

atto,

is Walker actually Henry Quirk (when stoned) ?

Are you actually lace (drunk)?

LMFAO!!

I figured that would tickle you...

Yeah, I've just managed to stop rolling around on the floor and struggled back to my desk. I would love to expand on the concept, but unfortunately would most definitely be banned.

[Walker]

Gosh unusually verbose.

It’s a Fredrick Douglass influence from the past caused by transmissions he was receiving from his future and adapting for his time.

In other words, Douglass was in the thick of slavery, so since you’re interested in who knows slaves and how many, read some of his speeches and get to know his mind a bit. Like a real historian would do. Then you can post some mature and relevant commentary that is well within your capacity to do so, while remaining on high alert for new and perhaps surprising insights that could challenge a lifetime of buttressing the known, that is, unless paradigm protections have grown too dense and impenetrable* for objectivity to shine through, in which case new insights won't get past the sneer or the leer, and into the noggin.


* It's an age-related condition called ossification that keeps the noggin from exploding.

In other words, the verbosity is to make things easier for Freddy, since that was his milieu.

[Walker]

Yeah, I've just managed to stop rolling around on the floor and struggled back to my desk. I would love to expand on the concept, but unfortunately would most definitely be banned.

Not if you use an appropriate form.

When folks are just doin’ what they gotta do then there aren’t many wherefores or whyhows, and not even many whoknows from the BigNo’s, (the folks who changed their names from BigNein after the Big One,) although there are exceptions.

[Sculptor]

In other words, Sculptor is answering the second, err, make that the third question, with a foggy ... Yes.

You DO know that you are quoting yourself??

I am getting confused by this entire page pretty much - is Walker actually Henry Quirk (when stoned) ?

Not sure if they are the same person, but they might as well be. You can't get a Rizla between them. They should just get a room together.

[Sculptor]

You DO know that you are quoting yourself??

In this case, the appropriate question is why.

The answer is because you're a slacker with the quoteables.

Have you been to confused.com ?