No, it's not a scientific journal, it's a basic primer on what sorts on things you can find in the fossil record and what they say about evolution.Averroes wrote: ↑Sun Jan 29, 2023 4:14 pmIs this what you referred previously as peer reviewed scientific journal?! You are not serious dude, this is propaganda material for high school students in the US. Now, I understand why you are so misinformed.Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Sun Jan 29, 2023 2:54 pm There's no single comprehensive link. The information is spread all over the place. I can give you examples.
https://www.ck12.org/book/ck-12-biology ... ion/10.21/
The burden of evidence is indeed on the people claiming evolution is true, you're absolutely right! That burden has been met and then some, which is why the scientific community at large accepts it as fact. The burden has been met. If you wish to contradict the established fact, the burden is on you to show why the scientific community has misinterpreted that evidence. Otherwise you're convincing no one.
You're unwillingness to look at any evidence doesn't change that.
I'm not here to prove to you that evolution is true, as I've said before. I'm here to show to reasonable people that your statement that the picture of evolution hasn't changed over the past 160 years is false. That's it. That's entirely independent of the claim that evolution is true. Even people who believe evolution is false should be able to see that the picture has changed. There are many times more fossils than there were before, those all contribute to the picture. We have DNA, which we hadn't discovered in Darwin's time, and that contributes to the picture.
Even if you disagree with the picture, it's undeniable by any honest person that the picture has changed.