Philosophy Now Forum

Iwannaplato.

No experience is knowledge, true it is temporal in the sense that judgment is to follow but at the moment it is knowledge truth, unquestioned until judgment arises. If there is nothing to trigger judgment it is pure knowledge, read pure truth to the individual organism.

Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Thu May 26, 2022 7:43 am

jayjacobus wrote: ↑Wed May 25, 2022 8:22 pm Knowledge can be contradictory and is many times only conjecture.

I assume you mean what is taken to be knowledge.

Knowledge requires understanding. Misunderstanding precludes knowledge.

Seeing through the uniformity. It's a seeing-through-the-contrasts-of-public psychology character, provided by OCD, the OCD character being Samantha Pufl.

OCD then. It's a suspension developer, in which the developer is free to be consciously deactivated from the suspension world itself, with no harm coming to the world.

The purpose, of the sharing of the OCD-seeing-through-the-contrasts-of-public psychology character:
It's the creation, embodied by Pufl, of the Anti being able to move towards the Mature Anti, in which the Mature Anti consists of militarism, university, business, dating and exorcisms.

Who can be a user, of this creation?
On the surface, it can be the creator of the idea existence (days being ideology, Brittney Havers being the philosophy atom's creator, travel existing within planets, cinema using days, in order for cinema to exit story from the brain etc), consisting of the geographical matter using the lengths, heights and widths of idea: Brittney Havers-Thomas Heath

A new definition of knowledge would be, a knowing of the world through the changing it makes to the biology of the body, processed by conscious understanding.

jayjacobus wrote: ↑Thu May 26, 2022 8:25 pm

Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Thu May 26, 2022 7:43 am

jayjacobus wrote: ↑Wed May 25, 2022 8:22 pm Knowledge can be contradictory and is many times only conjecture.

I assume you mean what is taken to be knowledge.

Knowledge requires understanding. Misunderstanding precludes knowledge.

I was reacting to the idea that knowledge is many times only conjecture. Was it knowledge if it is conjecture? Or is someone confusing conjecture with knowledge?

Conjecture is an unsubstantiated claim but in the first person there is self-substantiation, conjecture is for communication, for the individual it remains that experience is truth whether in the negative or the positive.