Re: your penalty box
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2022 7:54 pm
I just welcomed a new guest.
Gary Childress a man of incredible talent.
Gary Childress a man of incredible talent.
For the discussion of all things philosophical, especially articles in the magazine Philosophy Now.
https://forum.philosophynow.org/
You chopped off the qualification:attofishpi wrote: ↑Sat Jul 09, 2022 7:41 am..and let's just be clear within the above account, Xenophanes nailed nuffin..
You are one of the yeah buts me old mucker. While most people who believe in a god will never tire of telling you how fabulous their god is, and how their god coincidentally thinks just as they do; your god is a bit of a fucker.
Well said Will. Sober atto entirely agrees.uwot wrote: ↑Sat Jul 09, 2022 10:51 pmYou chopped off the qualification:attofishpi wrote: ↑Sat Jul 09, 2022 7:41 am..and let's just be clear within the above account, Xenophanes nailed nuffin..You are one of the yeah buts me old mucker. While most people who believe in a god will never tire of telling you how fabulous their god is, and how their god coincidentally thinks just as they do; your god is a bit of a fucker.
I just mostly POINT OUT and SHOW WHERE and WHY what 'you' have said or claimed is just False, Wrong, or Incorrect, and because you do NOT like these being POINTED OUT and SHOWN, you just IGNORE them, and BLINDLY CLASS them as NOT interesting to you.Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Sun Jun 19, 2022 3:11 pm Hm, I could read Age's previous post,w hich I can't see now, or I could see what Veritas has recently written. I disagree with VA on many things, but HIS mistakes and misrepresentations are vastly more interesting. At least he introduces a wide range of ideas, even if he often is not clear about them.
Well there is a LOT of ASSUMING here. Which, by the way, was Wrong AND Incorrect, AS USUAL.Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Sun Jun 19, 2022 3:11 pm And there's only so much time in the day, so I'll go read VA. CHoices. I know it's hard for Age to realize WHY people choose not to read him, but it's probably the most useful, insightful feedback he'll get, which unfortunately means he's ignored it so far.
It is not the one who will not budge form fact and the provable, it is the one who cannot stand.Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Sat Jul 09, 2022 11:58 am Phil8659
nasty/fragile gurus are so, like, 20th century, man.
Try this, recheck your list, you fudged up using it, I am not blocked by you at all.Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Mon Jul 11, 2022 8:26 am I got a notification that Phil8659 has responded to me here, perhaps upset I have blocked him.
If only I was curious enough to find out.