Age wrote: ↑Sun Jan 28, 2024 9:33 am
Okay.
But is 'it' REALLY 'okay' though, 'age'? Presently, as 'you' may indeed have POINTED OUT ABSOLUTELY Accurately, AND Right, what just TRANSPIRED and TOOK PLACE IS a referenced 'textbook example' OF what is occasionally ALLUDED TO AS 'gaslighting'. AND, ONCE AGAIN, this one here IS DEMONSTRATING that 'it' IS NOT GRASPING, and NOT UNDERSTANDING, what I have been STATING, POINTING OUT, and/or SHOWING here. If 'this' IS what 'you' OBSERVE, then 'this' IS what 'you' WILL RECEIVE. Also, OBSERVED VERY CLEARLY here ARE 'your' STRATEGIES OF DECEPTION, and DEFLECTION. Have 'you' REALLY NOT FIGURED OUT and UNDERSTOOD 'this' YET? Here 'we' HAVE ANOTHER instance of PRESUMPTIONS and BELIEFS AFFECTING 'the way' one LOOKS AT and PERCEIVES 'things'. BUT RECALL that IT IS 'I' WHO KNOWS thy Self, and that is IS 'you', who is STILL PUZZLED, and WONDERING, in relation TO the QUERY, 'Who am 'I'?' 'I' ALSO ALREADY KNOW and UNDERSTAND FAR MORE ABOUT 'you', then 'you' could EVEN now IMAGINE. Now, I COULD CHALLENGE and QUESTION 'you' OVER 'this', which IF 'you' WERE EVER Truly OPEN and Honest WOULD PROVE, IRREFUTABLY, what I SAY and CLAIM here, BUT DOING SO WOULD JUST BE ANOTHER WASTE. Here, 'they' WERE SEEKING some 'thing', but they DID NOT KNOW what 'it' IS, exactly. AND the REASON I DO NOT MAKE ANY 'thing' MORE COMPLEX IS BECAUSE 'you', human beings, ARE the ONLY 'things' that MAKE MORE COMPLEX 'that', which IS ESSENTIALLY NOT COMPLEX AT ALL and which NEVER NEEDS TO BE MADE 'MORE COMPLEX' NEITHER. ONCE AGAIN, 'you' have MANAGED TO COMPLETELY and UTTERLY OVERLOOK EXACTLY what I WAS DISCUSSING AND REFERRING TO here. As can be CLEARLY SEEN and PROVED Truth throughout 'this forum'. BUT I HAVE NEVER EVER ONCE LOOKED DOWN UP 'you', human beings. 'you' JUST PERCEIVE, SEE, ASSUME, and/or BELIEVE I DO, ONCE AGAIN, BECAUSE OF 'your' PREEXISTING BELIEFS, PRESUMPTIONS, PRECONCEPTIONS, ALONE. Part of the reason WHY 'you', human beings, are STILL SO LOST and CONFUSED, IS BECAUSE 'you' make what IS ESSENTIALLY Truly SIMPLE and EASY, COMPLEX and HARD, or DIFFICULT. INCLUDING 'your' OWN communications WITH "one another". I WOULD HOPE IS BECOMING MUCH MORE CLEARER, by now. 'I' DO NOT SAY 'this' BECAUSE OF JUST HOW OBVIOUSLY False, Wrong, Inaccurate, AND Incorrect 'it' REALLY IS. AND the ULTIMATE and FINAL 'communication/thing' that 'atla' wishes to, eventually, DISCLOSE is IRREFUTABLY incorrect. Also, are 'you' under some sort of DELUSION that the MEANING I FIND would CORRESPOND, EXACTLY, WITH 'your' OWN PERSONAL MEANING? Here 'we' have ANOTHER EXAMPLE an dMORE PROOF OF just how SIMPLY, EASILY, and QUICKLY 'things' GET DISTORTED and/or TWISTED by PREEXISTING BELIEFS and/or PRESUMPTIONS, which then LEAD INTO 'confirmation biases', which can be SO TOTALLY UNTRUE and False. 'I' DO NOT MAKE 'things' more COMPLEX, but RATHER 'you', human beings, do. The VERY REASON WHY 'you', human beings, do NOT UNDERSTAND "each other" FULLY, YET, BACK in the days. I would HOPE IS BECOMING MUCH MORE CLEARER, by now. The VERY REASON WHY 'you', human beings, do NOT UNDERSTAND "each other" FULLY, YET. I would HOPE IS BECOMING MUCH MORE CLEARER, by now. Here 'we' HAVE ANOTHER instance of PRESUMPTIONS and BELIEFS AFFECTING 'the way' one LOOKS AT and PERCEIVES 'things'. BUT I HAVE NEVER EVER ONCE LOOKED DOWN UP 'you', human beings. 'you' JUST PERCEIVE, SEE, ASSUME, and/or BELIEVE I DO, ONCE AGAIN, BECAUSE OF 'your' PREEXISTING BELIEFS, PRESUMPTIONS, PRECONCEPTIONS, ALONE. If 'this' IS what 'you' OBSERVE, then 'this' IS what 'you' WILL RECEIVE. NOW 'you' tell us, 'age', is 'it' TRULY OKAY??