Timekeeper wrote:
Yes. You call it Six Sigma. I call it systematic. It is the only approach that actually works...
Because you find out really quickly (low latency feedback) if anything is improving. If "Religion" is "going down by 50 % year on year" and evil is not.
You fucked up somewhere in your reasoning.
Note 'system' is very generic which is reducible to the input-process-output + control feedback.
Six Sigma is a very specific methodology that utilize system theory but the input objective is based on the 6 sigma [6σ] of the Normal Distribution.
A six sigma process is one in which 99.99966% of all opportunities to produce some feature of a part are statistically expected to be free of defects (3.4 defective features per million opportunities). e.g. Motorola set a goal of "six sigma" for all of its manufacturing.
Because you find out really quickly (low latency feedback) if anything is improving. If "Religion" is "going down by 50 % year on year" and evil is not.
Depending on which religion.
If 100% non-Islamic religion [number of believers], then evil is like say 10%.
It these religions are reduced to 50%, there would be no significance reduction in evil.
My estimation is at present Islamic-based evil acts is 90% [numbers and weightage] of all religious evil acts.
If Islam is reduced to 50% [number of Muslims] there is also no significant reduction in the % of Islamic based evil. Probably Islamic-related evil will be reduced by 5%.
The reasons being;
First the loads of immutable evil elements are still present in the religion to inspire and motivate SOME evil prone believers carry out their divine duty pertaining to these evil elements in the name of their God.
Second there are >1.5 billion Muslims, a reduction in 50% means there are still 750 million Muslims around the World.
Even if we reduce the number of Muslims to 100 million, the threat of Islamic related evil will still be there due to the immutable evil elements in the Quran [core ideology of Islam].
I see the most effective ways to remove religious-related evil acts is to wean of Islam, being the critical element.
I agree, if we remove all religions, there will still be an evil potential because the potential of evil acts is inherent within human beings.
In this case we can address the issue of all evil by other effective means under the umbrella of the Framework and System of Morality and Ethics which promote good and strive to get rid [or reduce] evil to the minimum.
Note I agree the above is all talk at present but I am optimistic given the current trend of progress we will be able to make significant progress in the near future.
You fucked up somewhere in your reasoning.
Don't be too hasty.
I have lots of reserves of knowledge [in areas I participates].
In general*, where have you caught me without an answer to your interrogation?
* I am not perfect so there could be rare exceptions.
