"There is not ONE gramme of "hostility" in this."
Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2017 5:43 pm
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
For the discussion of all things philosophical, especially articles in the magazine Philosophy Now.
https://forum.philosophynow.org/
I was only asking a question. I've often wondered what people mean when they describe themselves as a 'free spirit'.Hobbes' Choice wrote:Here's what I actually said, not what you think I said;ForCruxSake wrote:... but most leave because of the display of an overtly hostile attitude that has little to do with philosophy, the sheer bloody mindedness.Hobbes' Choice wrote: Some leave because of nutters, others because they can't stand the mirror of philosophy that unpacks their preconceptions.
I doubt that very much. Such self aggrandising epithets rarely survive the scrutiny of those in this Forum.
Should you continue to participate I shall point out your oh too conventional ideas, your mental chains, your meanness and your closed-mind.
I can already see the usual traditional mother-nature/hippie worn out old nutshell of a closed mind right here.
Take the Pepsi challenge!
But hello and welcome anyway!
There is not ONE gramme of "hostility" in this.
Are we being nice to each other now?vegetariantaxidermy wrote:I was only asking a question. I've often wondered what people mean when they describe themselves as a 'free spirit'.Hobbes' Choice wrote:Here's what I actually said, not what you think I said;ForCruxSake wrote: ... but most leave because of the display of an overtly hostile attitude that has little to do with philosophy, the sheer bloody mindedness.
I doubt that very much. Such self aggrandising epithets rarely survive the scrutiny of those in this Forum.
Should you continue to participate I shall point out your oh too conventional ideas, your mental chains, your meanness and your closed-mind.
I can already see the usual traditional mother-nature/hippie worn out old nutshell of a closed mind right here.
Take the Pepsi challenge!
But hello and welcome anyway!
There is not ONE gramme of "hostility" in this.
Perhaps the satirical intent of your comment was a little obscure for most?
I was only saying what I think. That's just my nature, and the PC free speech haters and other Nazis haven't quite managed to put a strait jacket on the internet (yet). But that will come.Hobbes' Choice wrote:Are we being nice to each other now?vegetariantaxidermy wrote:I was only asking a question. I've often wondered what people mean when they describe themselves as a 'free spirit'.Hobbes' Choice wrote:
Here's what I actually said, not what you think I said;
I doubt that very much. Such self aggrandising epithets rarely survive the scrutiny of those in this Forum.
Should you continue to participate I shall point out your oh too conventional ideas, your mental chains, your meanness and your closed-mind.
I can already see the usual traditional mother-nature/hippie worn out old nutshell of a closed mind right here.
Take the Pepsi challenge!
But hello and welcome anyway!
There is not ONE gramme of "hostility" in this.
Perhaps the satirical intent of your comment was a little obscure for most?
"Loan" can be both, in English.vegetariantaxidermy wrote: Btw, 'loan' is a noun, not a verb.
Do you also say 'wherefore art thou'? And those crappy online 'dictionaries' only pander to the US. Most of them are American sites. There is a perfectly good word to use when you give someone something that you want back. LEND. No doubt the past participle confused the poor dears so they just added 'ed' to the noun. Plus, 'loan' just sounds bloody stupid when used as a verb.thedoc wrote:"Loan" can be both, in English.vegetariantaxidermy wrote: Btw, 'loan' is a noun, not a verb.
I am very sorry that you live in one of the sub-standard countries of the world and not in America, the best country there is.vegetariantaxidermy wrote:Do you also say 'wherefore art thou'? And those crappy online 'dictionaries' only pander to the US. Most of them are American sites. There is a perfectly good word to use when you give someone something that you want back. LEND. No doubt the past participle confused the poor dears so they just added 'ed' to the noun. There is something very strange and disturbing at foot.thedoc wrote:"Loan" can be both, in English.vegetariantaxidermy wrote: Btw, 'loan' is a noun, not a verb.
It doesn't really count when you say it yourself. You might as well say 'I'm the handsomest man in the world'. If I could choose anywhere in the world to live, the US would be one notch above Somalia on the list.thedoc wrote:I am very sorry that you live in one of the sub-standard countries of the world and not in America, the best country there is.vegetariantaxidermy wrote:Do you also say 'wherefore art thou'? And those crappy online 'dictionaries' only pander to the US. Most of them are American sites. There is a perfectly good word to use when you give someone something that you want back. LEND. No doubt the past participle confused the poor dears so they just added 'ed' to the noun. There is something very strange and disturbing at foot.thedoc wrote:
"Loan" can be both, in English.
Then if you move to America, you would be moving up.vegetariantaxidermy wrote:It doesn't really count when you say it yourself. You might as well say 'I'm the handsomest man in the world'. If I could choose anywhere in the world to live, the US would be one notch above Somalia on the list.thedoc wrote:I am very sorry that you live in one of the sub-standard countries of the world and not in America, the best country there is.vegetariantaxidermy wrote: Do you also say 'wherefore art thou'? And those crappy online 'dictionaries' only pander to the US. Most of them are American sites. There is a perfectly good word to use when you give someone something that you want back. LEND. No doubt the past participle confused the poor dears so they just added 'ed' to the noun. There is something very strange and disturbing at foot.
Okay, but this is your last chance.Hobbes' Choice wrote:Are we being nice to each other now?