You know nothing about his assumptions.Dontaskme wrote: But he did assume he received a thought by saying ''I think therefore I am''
This does not contain any meaning or of "receive" or possess. he didn't say "have a thought" He said: I think" : form, make, create, formulate, generate, originate, produce a thought: it's going from the I outward, not coming in toward the Me.interpreted as I must exist to have a thought,
Repeating something silly doesn't make it less silly. If you don't believe me, try saying "The white cow jumped over the silver moon." 280 times.so again
Descartes.who is the I existing that must be in order to receive the thought?
I told you this already.
No, this is nothing to do with Descartes, whom you don't understand and probably haven't read, except this one sentence wholly out of context, yet presume to take to task, as if puny little Dontaskme had the intellectual wherewithal to judge so much as the stitching on the hem of Renee's cloak.Did he forget to explain that part of the statement... this ridiculous statement is the sickness of the human mind that thinks it is capable of thinking it is the one thinking.