That's precisely my point! If you were not interested in philosophy (how could you be, you didn't even have an idea what it was), in a bookstore full of books about thing you knew nothing about - you chose to buy THAT book.Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Sun Jan 24, 2021 12:37 am First, there has never been thousands of philosophy books in bookstores, especially not in mall bookstores back in the early 70s. I stumbled upon it in a small philosophy section in a mall bookstore and I was intrigued.
Why?
Because I am asking you how you "gained some idea of what philosophy is?"Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Sun Jan 24, 2021 12:37 am Right. You can't have an interest in something when you have no idea what it is, but once you discover (something about) whatever it is, once you gain some idea of that thing, you can have an interest in it. How is this not obvious?
For somebody that objects to long responses you sure seem to encourage them by avoiding simple questions like "What is philosophy?"
I thought this was clear right from the beginning? To become interested requires learning what it is.Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Sun Jan 24, 2021 12:37 am That in no way implies that you can't become interested in something that you didn't previously know about.
And with your most recent response it seems that to learn what it is it requires being intrigued by it.
Which, ironically, brings us right back to square one. Because we got ourselves in this mess here....
So, instead of arguing why anybody should show any interest in philosophy, now need to argue why anybody should be intrigued by it.Skepdick wrote: ↑Sat Jan 23, 2021 11:08 pmYou'd need to argue that anybody should show any interest in it.Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Sat Jan 23, 2021 11:07 pm We need to argue that you're not interested in it enough to study it? You're arguing that you are interested in it?
Potato, potatoh.