Philosophy Explorer wrote: ↑Sat Aug 05, 2017 7:12 pm
thedoc wrote: ↑Sat Aug 05, 2017 7:05 pm
I have stated numerous times that I agree that the climate is warming and that human activity is a contributing factor, I am not convinced that it will be the disaster that some are predicting. Usually when the climate gets warmer it also gets wetter in that there is more moisture which translates into more rain. The only question is where will the increased rain fall, that is a really important question and I think that most who predict disaster are just trying to get some political mileage out of it, as in "elect me and I'll fix it." when in fact they are just going to wait and see what happens. if it works out for the good, they are heroes, if it doesn't work out so good, the voting public has a very short memory.
For me doc, if the scientists can't get the local daily weather forecasts right (which is always over 90% of the time), then why should I trust what's said about climate which is much harder to predict?
PhilX
Climatology is a corrupted model of science. The topic gives science a bad name.
- Given the known patterns of the ice ages, mankind's release of sun energy stored in the planet could well be acting as God’s unwitting agent in delaying the next cycle of life attrition on the planet.
- Although logic indicates that everyone on the Asian continent and subcontinents simultaneously leaping off the planet could theoretically tweak the orbit, science indicates that anything at the bottom of the atmosphere still counts on the scales.
- The effects of leaping exuberance upon continental drift is less predictable, and the horrors of rising seas pale in comparison to the puzzle pieces that have drifted through the hemispheres. If this sounds riddlesome, just take a gander at these headlines:
- Temperatures plunge after BoM orders fix
- The Australian
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/nationa ... 1502178659
- Media’s silence of the climate scams
- The Australian
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/opinion ... 917e6566b2