Okay, read this from Nobel laureate for economics Paul Krugman of The New York Times: "The central cause of the profession's failure was the desire for an all-encompassing, intellectually elegant approach that gave economists a chance to show off their mathematical prowess."Why did you even bring economics up in this thread?
There is a lot of Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics occurring in economics. It is not just a political exercise as you may have thought.
I am a subscriber for 12 years of PN magazine. So I consider myself a money contributor and supporter of this form.
I don't understand this question.What's a "monitor" when its at home?