lancek4 wrote:AUK your observations a questions I agree with and are valid and pertinent. I think it shows an immature presumtuousnees for Typist to elude all querries to, basically, "you just don't really understand".
Thank you for joining the nonsense fantasy that's been repeated endlessly by the childlike inhabitants of these conversations.
Again, it's simply absolute rubbish to claim I've eluded queries, when the documented fact is I've typed about a billion words on this topic.
If a reader wants to understand aphilosphy, do aphilosophy instead of philosophy. It's that simple.
If it would speed things along, I could chain you to the ground and spoon feed the baby food in to your mouth, and then grasp your cheeks and help you chew it.
If a reader wants to understand aphilosphy, do aphilosophy instead of philosophy. It's that simple.
If it would speed things along, I could chain you to the ground and spoon feed the baby food in to your mouth, and then grasp your cheeks and help you chew it.
Rather than satisfying your need for sadism and bondage, why not just tell people in a way that they might be able to understand what doing 'aphilosophy' involves?
The meaning of one's words is the response they produce - simples.
lancek4 wrote:AUK your observations a questions I agree with and are valid and pertinent. I think it shows an immature presumtuousnees for Typist to elude all querries to, basically, "you just don't really understand".
Thank you for joining the nonsense fantasy that's been repeated endlessly by the childlike inhabitants of these conversations.
Again, it's simply absolute rubbish to claim I've eluded queries, when the documented fact is I've typed about a billion words on this topic.
If a reader wants to understand aphilosphy, do aphilosophy instead of philosophy. It's that simple.
iwhat makes you think I havnt 'done aphilosophy'. ? I think you havnt read anything I've (maybe we) posted, or if you have then you are stuck in a presumptuouness that prevents you from acknowledging what anyone says
t would speed things along, I could chain you to the ground and spoon feed the baby food in to your mouth, and then grasp your cheeks and help you chew it.
Typist, all you keep saying is 'do aphilosophy; it is 'not-thought''. Why don't you try to address specific problems that people are bringing up?
It comes off like you think that you are onto something you won't tell us, like priveledged information or experience. Don't you think that ALL of us feel this way? That's why we make propositions to discuss with others.
and thats not all! mindfulness is also hip in google, apple and facebook. cool. http://www.mindfulnet.org/page9.htm
making more money with zen.
business is no more practiced like newest religious cults.
by the way, typist. do you use reasoning and words to tell yourself why on earth you should even try aphilosophy? do horny playboy go to monk monastery where the play is harder than god using viagra? give me a link if i asked old question.
lancek4 wrote:Typist, all you keep saying is 'do aphilosophy; it is 'not-thought''. Why don't you try to address specific problems that people are bringing up?
It comes off like you think that you are onto something you won't tell us, like priveledged information or experience. Don't you think that ALL of us feel this way? That's why we make propositions to discuss with others.
lancek4 wrote:Typist, all you keep saying is 'do aphilosophy; it is 'not-thought''. Why don't you try to address specific problems that people are bringing up?
It comes off like you think that you are onto something you won't tell us, like priveledged information or experience. Don't you think that ALL of us feel this way? That's why we make propositions to discuss with others.
Why indeed not??
Do you think Typist is trying to make an extremely profound statement through his aphilosophical practice of not responding to these questions?
...wait.....................................ahhhhhhhh, I just practiced some aphilsophy. So good. ahhh Oh no, now im practicing philslophy, crap.... wait...........
So now to continue practicing aphilsophy while i communicate it, Im going to put all the aphilsophical stuff in parentheses. ok, here I go.......aaaahhhhhh (ok, so I am in a complete zen niravans state, and I am meeting with God now and I have found truth so you all should listen, since I am not practicing philsophy right now.
Truth is bro.. truth is that plant there, that tree. comtemplate the tree - wait but not philsophically. ok
how is the tree there different from your thoughts about the tree, and how is that different from when...) there is a tree. It is tall with a thin trunk and wide green leaves.
(ok, what is the difference?) .....ahhhhhh.. that was good. I hope you all understand now aphilosophy enough that you ngo practice it.
