Since you can't be arsed to consult your 'god' about 'Pan'
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pan_%28god%29
I do appreciate your interest and as always, I really appreciate you responding to my threads.
I do appreciate your interest and as always, I really appreciate you responding to my threads.
Is that what you got? No, its very clear, as is how its been usurped by the roman fauns.Bill Wiltrack wrote:The parentage of Pan is unclear...?
What point was it you were trying to illustrate with the picture?No dude. If that is what you are hanging your hat on - have at it. All I can try to relay to you is the name of the artist and the name of his painting that I used to illustrate a point.
Pretty much.Are you who you want to be?
Pray tell me the philosophical issue of this thread?Really. You seem to be concerned about minutia, clouding the waters, and never really able to grasp the philosophical issue of a thread anymore.
Save your pity for yourself.I just felt sad for you when you had to create a separate thread earlier so that you and a single friend could talk separately from the group.
Its always depended upon what they were and how they were presented. I admit to becoming less patient as the years go by with those who've not bothered to read any philosophy pontificating and making judgements about it. I've also become pretty bored with those who think communicating in pictures is better than words upon a philosophy forum.It appears that you are no longer able to handle other opinions.
Pop psychology now!You seemed so much stronger years ago. I am sorry if something has happened in your personal life.
You'd like that wouldn't you. The thought that the goaturder had somehow broken me. Some hope! Its much simpler than that, others with better and much the same arguments took up the discussion so I thought I'd bow out, as I was getting bored with his abuse, only popping-in when he gossiped about me(psst! I think he does this because he secretly misses me).Bill Wiltrack wrote:You are not able to argue a point anymore. Hey, I just thought of something... Did something happen to you within the discourse with Satyr? Over at the What is stopping us from seeing the truth? thread? Like boxers, can philosophers fare the same when faced with a defeat? Not saying you were defeated but I notice that you are no longer able or comfortable posting over there. ...
This the True you coming out now Bill?A while back I brought it to your attention that you were demeaning yourself when you were trying to demean Satyr. I know that effected you deeply. Is that a quagmire for you? In your heart have you been somehow defeated? A boxer's heart. It never comes back. Once it's broken...
Pathetic! Is that the best you can do? Better go back to your shepherd.Bill Wiltrack wrote:Never thought about it much but perhaps all the hits you have taken over the years have gotten to you. Instead of the current defining jousts making you stronger, every hit upon you now makes you weaker. If that is the case, you can't change things. All of us have to just stand here and recognize your situation and respect you for who you are...and where you are at. ...
KMA!Peace my friend.
pure fluff..and sentiment gone wrong here..UM who would be a boxer unless they are masochistic? who would let their face be ripped off never mind their heart? A boxer chooses to be ripped apart or win..boxing has nothing to do with his heart..it has to do with his physical prowess that is why low lifes like you love itA boxer's heart.
It never comes back.
Once it's broken...