And the solution is...?
10k Philosophy challenge
- henry quirk
- Posts: 15954
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
- Location: 🔥AMERICA🔥
- Contact:
Re: 10k Philosophy challenge
- accelafine
- Posts: 2772
- Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2023 10:16 pm
Re: 10k Philosophy challenge
What a scam. i wonder who was duped out of 9.5K of their 'prize'Daniel McKay wrote: ↑Fri Jul 19, 2024 4:18 am This challenge is now closed. I have a solution I am satisfied with. While the solution was developed by me, it was partially inspired by someone's suggestion and they received 5% of the money as an inspiration fee.

-
- Posts: 92
- Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2015 2:48 am
Re: 10k Philosophy challenge
I mean it's a bit complicated, but the nutshell version is that you what what risk of a 'nightmare scenario' (that stands in as a proxy for the totality of someone's freedom) people would accept in order to avoid a variety of different violations of their freedom. You bound the total at 100%, such that if you are considering, say, twenty violations of freedom, you have a minimum and a maximum of 100% total risk to assign between them. What you end up with is a rough picture of how different choices are valued both in comparison to each other and in comparison to the whole. And, if you assume the principle that each person's total freedom is worth the same as each other person's, and that people should be able to decide how much their various freedoms are worth within that total, then you can use that as a rough guide to what percentage of that value is lost when a certain freedom is violated. Obviously there are some practical issues with the surveying, but it's good enough for some broad strokes policy decisions at least, which is a huge step forward.
Someone sent me a system that was quite different, but which compared various violations to the person's death. While that didn't work, our conversation had me thinking a lot about what comparing to 'the whole' would look like, which is what ultimately led to the nightmare scenario method.
-
- Posts: 92
- Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2015 2:48 am
Re: 10k Philosophy challenge
As mentioned in the initial terms, partial solutions receive partial payouts, and in this case I think 5% was reasonable. Obviously I discussed this with the person in question and they seemed pleased with what they received for their contribution. It was a member of a different forum where I had also posted this problem.accelafine wrote: ↑Tue Feb 04, 2025 10:57 pmWhat a scam. i wonder who was duped out of 9.5K of their 'prize'Daniel McKay wrote: ↑Fri Jul 19, 2024 4:18 am This challenge is now closed. I have a solution I am satisfied with. While the solution was developed by me, it was partially inspired by someone's suggestion and they received 5% of the money as an inspiration fee.![]()
- henry quirk
- Posts: 15954
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
- Location: 🔥AMERICA🔥
- Contact:
Re: 10k Philosophy challenge
I'm havin' a hard time wrappin' my head around this nightmare scenario thing. Can you give me a practical or concrete example or a real world scenario?
-
- Posts: 92
- Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2015 2:48 am
Re: 10k Philosophy challenge
So I'm still working out the best way to communicate it in a way people can understand, but something like this:henry quirk wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 2:35 pmI'm havin' a hard time wrappin' my head around this nightmare scenario thing. Can you give me a practical or concrete example or a real world scenario?
You spend the rest of your life (as long as you would live otherwise) in a coma, but you are still aware of everything that happens to you. You come under the care of an unscrupulous doctor who sees you as a money-making opportunity. He confiscates everything you own and then rents you out for experiments of various drugs that change your thought patterns, people who want to come and beat up a coma patient, and organ sales. You continue to live like this for as long as you would otherwise live, unable to move, communicate, or act in any way, while what happens to your body, property, and even your mind is left to the capricious will of others.
I'm thinking something along those lines.
- henry quirk
- Posts: 15954
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
- Location: 🔥AMERICA🔥
- Contact:
Re: 10k Philosophy challenge
You say My goal in constructing my normative theory is to determine how free, rational agents ought to be or act,Daniel McKay wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2025 12:13 am You spend the rest of your life (as long as you would live otherwise) in a coma, but you are still aware of everything that happens to you. You come under the care of an unscrupulous doctor who sees you as a money-making opportunity. He confiscates everything you own and then rents you out for experiments of various drugs that change your thought patterns, people who want to come and beat up a coma patient, and organ sales. You continue to live like this for as long as you would otherwise live, unable to move, communicate, or act in any way, while what happens to your body, property, and even your mind is left to the capricious will of others.
where “ought” is understood in an objective and universal sense, assuming that this question has an
answer so the question in your scenario above is: is the doctor acting immorally, yes?
Re: 10k Philosophy challenge
Will you provide some examples of where and how it is 'good enough' for some alleged 'broad strokes policy decisions'?Daniel McKay wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 12:24 pmI mean it's a bit complicated, but the nutshell version is that you what what risk of a 'nightmare scenario' (that stands in as a proxy for the totality of someone's freedom) people would accept in order to avoid a variety of different violations of their freedom. You bound the total at 100%, such that if you are considering, say, twenty violations of freedom, you have a minimum and a maximum of 100% total risk to assign between them. What you end up with is a rough picture of how different choices are valued both in comparison to each other and in comparison to the whole. And, if you assume the principle that each person's total freedom is worth the same as each other person's, and that people should be able to decide how much their various freedoms are worth within that total, then you can use that as a rough guide to what percentage of that value is lost when a certain freedom is violated. Obviously there are some practical issues with the surveying, but it's good enough for some broad strokes policy decisions at least, which is a huge step forward.
if no, then WHY NOT?
Daniel McKay wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 12:24 pm Someone sent me a system that was quite different, but which compared various violations to the person's death. While that didn't work, our conversation had me thinking a lot about what comparing to 'the whole' would look like, which is what ultimately led to the nightmare scenario method.
Re: 10k Philosophy challenge
But, obviously, they, ACTUALLY, could be NOT pleased AT ALL, correct?Daniel McKay wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 12:27 pmAs mentioned in the initial terms, partial solutions receive partial payouts, and in this case I think 5% was reasonable. Obviously I discussed this with the person in question and they seemed pleased with what they received for their contribution. It was a member of a different forum where I had also posted this problem.accelafine wrote: ↑Tue Feb 04, 2025 10:57 pmWhat a scam. i wonder who was duped out of 9.5K of their 'prize'Daniel McKay wrote: ↑Fri Jul 19, 2024 4:18 am This challenge is now closed. I have a solution I am satisfied with. While the solution was developed by me, it was partially inspired by someone's suggestion and they received 5% of the money as an inspiration fee.![]()
Re: 10k Philosophy challenge
If I am AWARE OF EVERYTHING that happens to me, then I am, OBVIOUSLY, NOT IN a coma.Daniel McKay wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2025 12:13 amSo I'm still working out the best way to communicate it in a way people can understand, but something like this:henry quirk wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2025 2:35 pmI'm havin' a hard time wrappin' my head around this nightmare scenario thing. Can you give me a practical or concrete example or a real world scenario?
You spend the rest of your life (as long as you would live otherwise) in a coma, but you are still aware of everything that happens to you.
Would you like to PICK and REPHRASE 'your words' MORE CAREFULLY, here?
If no, then WHY NOT?
you were ASKED FOR 'real world scenarios'.
AGAIN, 'real world scenarios' were ASKED FOR.Daniel McKay wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2025 12:13 am You come under the care of an unscrupulous doctor who sees you as a money-making opportunity. He confiscates everything you own and then rents you out for experiments of various drugs that change your thought patterns, people who want to come and beat up a coma patient, and organ sales.
Is this for as long as I would have otherwise lived;Daniel McKay wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2025 12:13 am You continue to live like this for as long as you would otherwise live,
FROM being BEATEN UP and FROM HAVING MY ORGANS REMOVED,
OR FROM if I was NOT under the so-called 'care' of an "unscrupulous doctor"?
And, did you REALLY NEED TO SEARCH the internet FOR A so-called RESOLUTION, FROM others, here?Daniel McKay wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2025 12:13 am unable to move, communicate, or act in any way, while what happens to your body, property, and even your mind is left to the capricious will of others.
you REALLY ARE NOT EXPLAINING MUCH AT ALL, here.