Pure Negation Results in Paradox

[Eodnhoj7]

Under the pure negation of everything, including the act of negation, does thus result in pure negation being a paradox?

[godelian]

Under the pure negation of everything, including the act of negation, does thus result in pure negation being a paradox?

Negation is an operator or a predicate:

negation (false) = true
negation (true) = false

Negation of negation is again an operator or a predicate:

negation (negation (false)) = false
negation negation ((true)) = true

What you are trying to do, negation(negation) is not possible because negation only accepts truth values:

negation(boolean) -> boolean

The negation predicate is itself not a valid truth value.

Therefore, negation(negation) is not a paradox but a type error.

[Eodnhoj7]

Under the pure negation of everything, including the act of negation, does thus result in pure negation being a paradox?

Negation is an operator or a predicate:

negation (false) = true
negation (true) = false

Negation of negation is again an operator or a predicate:

negation (negation (false)) = false
negation negation ((true)) = true

What you are trying to do, negation(negation) is not possible because negation only accepts truth values:

negation(boolean) -> boolean

The negation predicate is itself not a valid truth value.

Therefore, negation(negation) is not a paradox but a type error.

Pure negation is both form and function. Negation is not limited to a truth value as a car can be negated by a crash. Car is car, it is not limited to true or false.

An operator can be a predicate considering the transitional nature of occurences makes the nature of operator and predicate relativistic to context. Expand the context and opposites exist simultaneously.