Is open sexism getting worse here?

[Eodnhoj7]

Like that time I didn't consider your experiment with divining rods that detected psychic pyramid-related mental anguish to be proper science, and you though I was bigotted against witchcraft?

I would like to see where and if I used the term bigoted in that conversation, please show me a context of use. A quote please.

Regardless I forgot about the conversation until now, and I still don't remember you being a part of it. It is not that I doubt you where a part of it, I am sure your memory is correct, it just shows how little value I put to our interactions.

Anyhow, how is constantly being critical of other's going for you, considering that is all you offer to these forums? It must be rough when you are all alone and have to stand in front of a mirror looking at yourself...oh wait when you talk into it to motivate yourself does that count as witchcraft too? "Mirror mirror on the wall...."

Flashysmartypants is a compulsive untruther. He can't help it. Par for the course with wokies.

I would not say he is an "untruther", that requires knowing up from down and he doesn't have the capacity for that...pigs only know having their face in the dirt, that is their reality, so they assume all is dirt.

[FlashDangerpants]

And from what I read the quote said "you can beat up the dowsing rods", I don't see where you are directly attacking me, unless that is what you feel you where doing in which case you are accusing yourself of bigotry and not me.

Oh come on, catch up with the bit you slow bastard. The thing you wrote that I was responding to was "Dually anyone can be labeled a bigot for any reason when discrimination is applied"

So obviously I was applying that rule at myself for that time I was so "prejudiced" against your witchraft. This wasn't ever some switcheroo to call you a bigot, I was just reminding you of a time when you thought I was a bigot while I laughed at you somewhat unkindly in the way that Victorians used to prod the madmen in the madhouse, making your complaint at least just a little bit true.

[Eodnhoj7]

And from what I read the quote said "you can beat up the dowsing rods", I don't see where you are directly attacking me, unless that is what you feel you where doing in which case you are accusing yourself of bigotry and not me.

Oh come on, catch up with the bit you slow bastard. The thing you wrote that I was responding to was "Dually anyone can be labeled a bigot for any reason when discrimination is applied"

So obviously I was applying that rule at myself for that time I was so "prejudiced" against your witchraft. This wasn't ever some switcheroo to call you a bigot, I was just reminding you of a time when you thought I was a bigot while I laughed at you somewhat unkindly in the way that Victorians used to prod the madmen in the madhouse, making your complaint at least just a little bit true.

But at that time I never accused you of bigotry. You are not bright. I will simplify things for you. The logic, I use in this thread, not the one from years ago, is that the term bigot can be argued anytime a discrimination is made effectively making it a meaningless term.

[FlashDangerpants]

And from what I read the quote said "you can beat up the dowsing rods", I don't see where you are directly attacking me, unless that is what you feel you where doing in which case you are accusing yourself of bigotry and not me.

Oh come on, catch up with the bit you slow bastard. The thing you wrote that I was responding to was "Dually anyone can be labeled a bigot for any reason when discrimination is applied"

So obviously I was applying that rule at myself for that time I was so "prejudiced" against your witchraft. This wasn't ever some switcheroo to call you a bigot, I was just reminding you of a time when you thought I was a bigot while I laughed at you somewhat unkindly in the way that Victorians used to prod the madmen in the madhouse, making your complaint at least just a little bit true.

But at that time I never accused you of bigotry. You are not bright. I will simplify things for you. The logic, I use in this thread, not the one from years ago, is that the term bigot can be argued anytime a discrimination is made effectively making it a meaningless term.

And I am indeed saying that you have made that accusation of bigotry. You just didn't use the word at me, you used it at Arising_UK for the same thing I was doing.

What you fail to understand, or rather ignore, is that I am "arguing" the experiment should not be limited to that context alone...that is what you don't understand...because if you did it makes you look like an angry ignorant bigot

So the more applicable logic is that you have attempted to use the term "bigot" to complain about people not taking your witchcraft based science experiments seriously in the past, and that you made a fool of yourself in doing so. Because of course the discrimination you complained of then wasn't unreasonable and therefore wasn't really bigotry.

So well done, you are catching up slowly. People can indeed make a claim of bigotry any time they perceive discrimination, but they can't necessarily make it stick. To demonstrate bigotry one must demonstrate some degree of irrationality.

But not all such discrimination is irrational, sometimes the guy is just an idiot trying to measure psychic waves from a pyramid using dousing rods and claiming to be measuring electrical discharges with them. It's not a meaningless term if you can get it wrong.

[Eodnhoj7]

Oh come on, catch up with the bit you slow bastard. The thing you wrote that I was responding to was "Dually anyone can be labeled a bigot for any reason when discrimination is applied"

So obviously I was applying that rule at myself for that time I was so "prejudiced" against your witchraft. This wasn't ever some switcheroo to call you a bigot, I was just reminding you of a time when you thought I was a bigot while I laughed at you somewhat unkindly in the way that Victorians used to prod the madmen in the madhouse, making your complaint at least just a little bit true.

But at that time I never accused you of bigotry. You are not bright. I will simplify things for you. The logic, I use in this thread, not the one from years ago, is that the term bigot can be argued anytime a discrimination is made effectively making it a meaningless term.

And I am indeed saying that you have made that accusation of bigotry. You just didn't use the word at me, you used it at Arising_UK for the same thing I was doing.

What you fail to understand, or rather ignore, is that I am "arguing" the experiment should not be limited to that context alone...that is what you don't understand...because if you did it makes you look like an angry ignorant bigot

So the more applicable logic is that you have attempted to use the term "bigot" to complain about people not taking your witchcraft based science experiments seriously in the past, and that you made a fool of yourself in doing so. Because of course the discrimination you complained of then wasn't unreasonable and therefore wasn't really bigotry.

So well done, you are catching up slowly. People can indeed make a claim of bigotry any time they perceive discrimination, but they can't necessarily make it stick. To demonstrate bigotry one must demonstrate some degree of irrationality.

But not all such discrimination is irrational, sometimes the guy is just an idiot trying to measure psychic waves from a pyramid using dousing rods and claiming to be measuring electrical discharges with them. It's not a meaningless term if you can get it wrong.

I saw the length of the post only, not reading what was written, and realized if you took that much time to write it you need the win for your low sense of self worth...so congratulations you get a gold star...or do you want a smiley face?

[FlashDangerpants]

But at that time I never accused you of bigotry. You are not bright. I will simplify things for you. The logic, I use in this thread, not the one from years ago, is that the term bigot can be argued anytime a discrimination is made effectively making it a meaningless term.

And I am indeed saying that you have made that accusation of bigotry. You just didn't use the word at me, you used it at Arising_UK for the same thing I was doing.

What you fail to understand, or rather ignore, is that I am "arguing" the experiment should not be limited to that context alone...that is what you don't understand...because if you did it makes you look like an angry ignorant bigot

So the more applicable logic is that you have attempted to use the term "bigot" to complain about people not taking your witchcraft based science experiments seriously in the past, and that you made a fool of yourself in doing so. Because of course the discrimination you complained of then wasn't unreasonable and therefore wasn't really bigotry.

So well done, you are catching up slowly. People can indeed make a claim of bigotry any time they perceive discrimination, but they can't necessarily make it stick. To demonstrate bigotry one must demonstrate some degree of irrationality.

But not all such discrimination is irrational, sometimes the guy is just an idiot trying to measure psychic waves from a pyramid using dousing rods and claiming to be measuring electrical discharges with them. It's not a meaningless term if you can get it wrong.

I saw the length of the post only, not reading what was written, and realized if you took that much time to write it you need the win for your low sense of self worth...so congratulations you get a gold star...or do you want a smiley face?

It was about 7 or 8 sentences.

[Eodnhoj7]

And I am indeed saying that you have made that accusation of bigotry. You just didn't use the word at me, you used it at Arising_UK for the same thing I was doing.

So the more applicable logic is that you have attempted to use the term "bigot" to complain about people not taking your witchcraft based science experiments seriously in the past, and that you made a fool of yourself in doing so. Because of course the discrimination you complained of then wasn't unreasonable and therefore wasn't really bigotry.

So well done, you are catching up slowly. People can indeed make a claim of bigotry any time they perceive discrimination, but they can't necessarily make it stick. To demonstrate bigotry one must demonstrate some degree of irrationality.

But not all such discrimination is irrational, sometimes the guy is just an idiot trying to measure psychic waves from a pyramid using dousing rods and claiming to be measuring electrical discharges with them. It's not a meaningless term if you can get it wrong.

I saw the length of the post only, not reading what was written, and realized if you took that much time to write it you need the win for your low sense of self worth...so congratulations you get a gold star...or do you want a smiley face?

It was about 7 or 8 sentences.

I know that, relatively speaking, was difficult for you, thinking that is, so I also give you a unicorn sticker....

[FlashDangerpants]

I saw the length of the post only, not reading what was written, and realized if you took that much time to write it you need the win for your low sense of self worth...so congratulations you get a gold star...or do you want a smiley face?

It was about 7 or 8 sentences.

I know that, relatively speaking, was difficult for you, thinking that is, so I also give you a unicorn sticker....

Ok, well I was right, you were wrong, you gave up, buh bye.

[Eodnhoj7]

It was about 7 or 8 sentences.

I know that, relatively speaking, was difficult for you, thinking that is, so I also give you a unicorn sticker....

Ok, well I was right, you were wrong, you gave up, buh bye.

Here is another gold star....now you have two gold stars, and two is one and one in case that was too difficult for you to understand.

[FlashDangerpants]

I know that, relatively speaking, was difficult for you, thinking that is, so I also give you a unicorn sticker....

Ok, well I was right, you were wrong, you gave up, buh bye.

Here is another gold star....now you have two gold stars, and two is one and one in case that was too difficult for you to understand.

Cool, thanks. I'll just take the last word on the matter while I am at it.

[Eodnhoj7]

Ok, well I was right, you were wrong, you gave up, buh bye.

Here is another gold star....now you have two gold stars, and two is one and one in case that was too difficult for you to understand.

Cool, thanks. I'll just take the last word on the matter while I am at it.

No problem, anything for you Flash...

[FlashDangerpants]

Here is another gold star....now you have two gold stars, and two is one and one in case that was too difficult for you to understand.

Cool, thanks. I'll just take the last word on the matter while I am at it.

No problem, anything for you Flash...

Nice. Hopefully this new version of you won't have to go back to wherever it was that they only allowed you internet once per week on Thrursday mornings for about a year or so. What was that, prison?

[Eodnhoj7]

Cool, thanks. I'll just take the last word on the matter while I am at it.

No problem, anything for you Flash...

Nice. Hopefully this new version of you won't have to go back to wherever it was that they only allowed you internet once per week on Thrursday mornings for about a year or so. What was that, prison?

No, moderation. I intentionally got rid of the internet for a time so to have a more focused perspective. Now I have it again and after a while will get rid of it again...and repeat the loop.

[FlashDangerpants]

No problem, anything for you Flash...

Nice. Hopefully this new version of you won't have to go back to wherever it was that they only allowed you internet once per week on Thrursday mornings for about a year or so. What was that, prison?

No, moderation. I intentionally got rid of the internet for a time so to have a more focused perspective. Now I have it again and after a while will get rid of it again...and repeat the loop.

Well good for you then.

I will return one gold star