Should SCULPTOR and AGE be banned for their conduct?

[attofishpi]

--- ---

I have complained to the moderator of the forum Rick and still no reply. Is the below conduct acceptable? It's one thing to allow free speech and I subscibe to the magazine to support this forum, but to allow SLANDEROUS LIES of the nature below to remain without any action from you or the moderators is disgusting in my opinion.
I shouldn't have to make any threats, and it seems my money isn't needed - thus unless action is taken upon "Sculptor" and "Age" I will withdraw my financial support of the magazine\forum.


Sculptor - quoted ME as if I said the following:
I have the eyes to see black and brown people as evil.
THey are subhumans and follow Islam the Devil's religion.
I eat Arabs for breakfast, Negroes for Lunch and Asians for Dinner.
What I cannot consume I feed to my human pet, whoc I keep in the cellar.

HERE: (viewtopic.php?t=42310&start=30)


Age - stated I am a paedophile and claimed to have evidence of it:
"attofishpi" why do you criticize pedophilia, yet you are a "pedophile"
Oh, and by the way, I could prove, irrefutably, that you are not just a "pedophile" in not just one way but in two ways., actually.

HERE: (viewtopic.php?t=42310&start=60)


NEITHER have provided any evidence that I am indeed a racist or a paedophile.

[accelafine]

I'm pretty sure it's a banning offence to mess around with the 'quote' feature like that. You know that blueberry cupcake can say what he likes. He's also the most sanctimonious, projecting, abusive, racist, misogynistic, anti-semitic person on here. He thinks that burning Jewish children alive is just 'pally boys having a bit of fun and letting off steam.' What kind of a psychopathic monster 'thinks' like that?

[attofishpi]

Thank you for agreeing on the ban.

Sculptor--> in a thread titled "THEISM is WISER than ATHEISM in PHILOSOPHY"

Thinks calling me:- Racist., Islamophobic. transphobic, homophobic. is appropriate to the thread!! - I mean what sort of CLOWN is he?

---bla bla--

Provide evidence that I am:
Racist -- provide evidence
Islamophobic (I have a rational fear of Islam - where much doctrine instructs followers to convert or kill non-believers)
transphobic --- I don't even know what that means! I take trans-atlantic flights some times..
Homophobic - - provide evidence (some very good friends of mine are homosexual)


One of my favourite GAY men is Douglas Murray - in this video he points out that Muslims in his home country ENGLAND want homosexuality outlawed!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9UDBj02N06o&t=274s

So truly Sculptor you CLOWN that fights for the right to have more Islamic Muslim migration - TRULY YOU ARE THE HOMOPHOBE or more likely and as I have pointed out in EVERY debate I have ever had with you (ALL of which I have won), you are intellectually inept.

[Atla]

Fun fact, it's not uncommon to make a thread asking to ban Sculptor
https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/petit ... or/48143/1

Wonder if both Age and Sculptor are women. I'd be sad if that turned out to be the case.

[Flannel Jesus]

Wonder if both Age and Sculptor are women. I'd be sad if that turned out to be the case.

Why, what's sad about that?

[Atla]

Wonder if both Age and Sculptor are women. I'd be sad if that turned out to be the case.

Why, what's sad about that?

Women have like twice the mental capacity for social stuff, it pains me a little when some of them still end up as incorrigible a-holes.

[attofishpi]

Fun fact, it's not uncommon to make a thread asking to ban Sculptor
https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/petit ... or/48143/1

Wonder if both Age and Sculptor are women. I'd be sad if that turned out to be the case.

An average woman is far more intelligent than them both put together. Sculptor has called me a misogynist - I guess that's a point for me.

[Flannel Jesus]

Wonder if both Age and Sculptor are women. I'd be sad if that turned out to be the case.

Why, what's sad about that?

Women have like twice the mental capacity for social stuff, it pains me a little when some of them still end up as incorrigible a-holes.

Ah I see, I thought you just really didn't like the idea of wanting to bang age and sculptor or something.

[Atla]

Why, what's sad about that?

Women have like twice the mental capacity for social stuff, it pains me a little when some of them still end up as incorrigible a-holes.

Ah I see, I thought you just really didn't like the idea of wanting to bang age and sculptor or something.

Ehh

[Sculptor]

Poor upset little doggie.


You can dish it out but can't take it

[Sculptor]

Here's what the little doggie is so scared of.

Plaestinian

tired.jpg (31 KiB) Viewed 237 times

[Peter Kropotkin]

as for banning people, I am always against that....
let the ''marketplace'' of ideas that this website and other
websites are, be the judge of the value of one's writings.....

as far as I can tell, there is no ''Marquess of Queensberry
rules'' for Philosophy that we must follow in engaging in philosophy....
and lacking such rules, and while acknowledging that philosophy
can be rather rough and perhaps even a mean/vicious practice,
that is part of playing the philosophical ''game''..... read
what philosophers have written in the past about other
philosophers, and one can see that most philosophers have
been very mean and vicious about past philosophers.......

and I have no problem with what either Sculptor or Age has said,
and banning? neither has said anything, anything at all, that is worth even
censoring them, little less banning...

Now that Kropotkin idiot, I would definitely ban that moron.....
as being unfit to be a philosopher.....

Kropotkin

[phyllo]

Calling someone a pedophile is not a game.

Making fake quotes and attributing them to someone is not a game.

You might want to study some ethics.

[Peter Kropotkin]

Calling someone a pedophile is not a game.

Making fake quotes and attributing them to someone is not a game.

You might want to study some ethics.

K: I invite you to make such a study by connecting ethics
with calling someone a ''pedophile".... what is the ethics involved
and in doing so, whose ethics/morals were violated?

you seem to believe that making up quotes and attributing them to
someone is ''unethical''... great, make that philosophical argument...
I look forward to it.....

Kropotkin

[Peter Kropotkin]

upon further reflection, I am a bit confused.....

read the op title and then reflect on the word ''conduct''

CONDUCT: The manner in which a person ''BEHAVES'',
especially on a particular occasion or in a particular context..
''all three brothers were known for their disorderly conduct''

that definition seems to exclude the two of them, Sculptor
and Age from banning.... conduct is actions, behavior... where all
either one of them did were to make comments... no actions or
behavior involved... why should we ban people for words?
But Kropotkin, we do ban people for their words....
for example, we ban people for antisemite words or words
that praise Hitler and his methods? Wishing Hitler had
gone all the way would be banned... so, what is the difference
between the two set of words? That boys and girls is a legitimate
philosophical problem.....why ban some speech and not others?

Kropotkin