Note:
There are Two Senses of 'Objectivity'
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=39326
1. The human-based-FSRC sense of objectivity
2. The absolute independence [mind] sense of objectivity.
- PH insist morality is not objective based on 2, i.e. all facts [objective] are independent regardless of humans; moral elements are based on opinions, beliefs, feelings and judgment' therefore morality cannot be objective.
In my case, Moral Objectivity is based on the human-based-FSRC sense of objectivity [1] that is dynamic.
The critical advantage FSRC-ed Moral Objectivity over others is the recognition of moral facts and the moral functions inherent within the human neural system, which will facilitates humanity to expedite moral intelligence & progress [average moral quotient] in the future.
From AI [wR];
From WIKI;AI wrote:Moral objectivity based on a human-based framework and system (FS) offers several advantages over moral relativism, skepticism, and nihilism. Here are some additional benefits to consider:
1. Shared moral ground: Moral objectivity (FS) allows for a foundation of common morality. Even with cultural variations within the FS, there would be core principles everyone could agree on (e.g., minimizing suffering). This fosters communication, cooperation, and the resolution of moral conflicts.
2. Accountability and Justice: An FS-based system allows for holding individuals and societies accountable for their actions. Universal moral principles establish a framework for judging right and wrong, promoting justice and deterring wrongdoing.
3. Motivation and Inspiration: Knowing there are objective moral truths can be a powerful motivator. It gives purpose and direction to actions beyond personal gain, inspiring people to strive for the betterment of themselves and society.
4. Openness to Revision and Improvement: While the FS provides a foundation, it doesn't have to be static. As societies evolve and gain new knowledge, the FS can adapt through open discourse and critical examination. This fosters progress in moral understanding.
5. Combating Moral Nihilism and Skepticism: FS-based objectivity counters the apathy and despair of nihilism and skepticism. It provides a framework for making moral judgments and taking action to improve the world.
Comparison with other views:
• Moral Relativism: FS avoids the pitfalls of relativism, where actions can be right or wrong depending on the culture, leading to potential moral inconsistency and difficulty in addressing universal issues like human rights.
• Moral Skepticism: FS offers a path out of skepticism by proposing a framework within which moral knowledge can be ascertained and justified.
• Moral Nihilism: FS provides meaning and purpose in contrast to [moral] nihilism, where [...] morality is seen as meaningless.
Moral realism allows the ordinary rules of logic (modus ponens, etc.) to be applied straightforwardly to moral statements. We can say that a moral belief is false or unjustified or contradictory in the same way we would about a factual belief. This is a problem for expressivism, as shown by the Frege–Geach problem.
Another advantage of moral realism is its capacity to resolve moral disagreements: if two moral beliefs contradict one another, realism says that they cannot both be right, and therefore everyone involved ought to be seeking out the right answer to resolve the disagreement. Contrary theories of meta-ethics have trouble even formulating the statement "this moral belief is wrong," and so they cannot resolve disagreements in this way.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_realism#Advantages
Discuss??
Views??