A FRSC is Not Constructed Literally

[Veritas Aequitas]

To repeat. If to construct a model of reality (an 'FSRC') is to construct reality, then of what is the model a model? And if all we can know about reality are the models we construct, how can we construct them in the first place? And how can we assess and, if necessary, change them?

You misinterpreted and misunderstood the fundamentals of a FSRC.

There is no conscious construction of the fundamental FSRC by an individual or group of humans.
A FSRC [the fundamental] is something that is evolving and had pre-existed, evolved & adapted within humans inherently; a FSRC is grounded on a 13.7b years physical history since the BB and 3.5b of organic history.

Analogy:
The fundamental FSRC is like any evolved inherent human function. e.g. the digestive system which has evolved and adapted by humans initiated since 3.5b years ago in relation to nutritional requirement of a living organisms.
As such, the fundamental principles of the FSRC do not change while certain of its fringe forms may vary with circumstances and conditions.
Example, different people from different parts of the world, produce, prepare and consume food for nutrition in different ways and methods, but their digestive system is generic to all humans.

Discuss??
Views??

[Veritas Aequitas]

Notes: KIV

[Veritas Aequitas]

You don't answer my questions, so here they are again:

If to construct a model of reality (an 'FSRC') is to construct reality, then of what is the model a model? And if all we can know about reality are the models we construct, how can we construct them in the first place? And how can we assess and, if necessary, change them?

And now you say humans have an evolved 'framework and system of reality and cognition' - a fundamental FSRC - which we didn't consciously construct as a model. Presumably the sub-FSRCs or sub-FSKs, such as in physics, chemistry and so on, fit into the bigger, fundamental FSRC.

So, please answer these questions, adapted to accommodate your new dodge.

1 What is our evolved fundamental FSRC model of reality (EFFSRCMR) - a model of?

What is your evolved fundamental digestive system a model of?
What is your evolved fundamental sexual system a model of?

You can get all the answers from the science-biology FSRC.

2 If all we can know about reality is our evolved fundamental FSRC model of reality (EFFSRCMR), how can we know that? From which perspective?

Note my
There are Two Senses of Reality
viewtopic.php?t=40265
1. My FSRC sense of reality
2. Your mind-independent sense - grounded on an illusion

If your question refer to your 2, then your illusory reality is a non-starter.

What I am referring to is the FRSC-ed reality.
What is Known [epistemology] is based on the FSC[knowledge] of the FSRC. That is how one knows what is reality and live in it optimally.
The moon exists but not regardless of humans.
The reality of the moon is conditioned upon a human-based FSRC.

3 How can we assess that EFFSRCMR and, if necessary, change it?

Can you change the human digestive system?
It may be possible but not in the present, maybe in a 1000 years.

4 Why does the fact that we have an EFFSRCMR mean that there is no reality outside or unconditioned by our EFFSRCMR?

"that there is a reality outside or unconditioned by our FSRC?" is psychologically driven by an evolutionary default, it is needed as an ideological belief for psychologically reason.
If we give up the above belief as many has done, it will not change the reality of humanity one bit.

The belief "that there is a reality outside or unconditioned by our FSRC?" is a useful psychological belief for the majority [especially in the past] due to an evolutionary default but such an ideological belief has contributed to the hindrance of the progress of humanity and also loads of evil and violence from such a belief.
Note the evil and violence in the belief of an absolutely independent God.