First, it would help if you don't translate "metaphysical" as "magical". "Metaphysics" also means "the basis of science" (its axioms and definitions). Ancient Language was the basis of a different type of science I call "ancient science" but might also be called "natural science", "animal science", or "observational science". Ancient science does not employ experiment. Any observation that was set up in advance would be considered as introducing unknown variables were ancient scientists capable of thinking in such terms. A beaver doesn't eschew a new theory or means of preparing wood for its dam rather it just sees a pattern that it tries to fill with a new shape. It's not thinking and if it did its thoughts would look a little like that last sentence, for which I apologize profusely. The beaver and butterfly are thinking in three dimensions so even though it has so little computational ability or knowledge it can still act appropriately to reality and live another day. This is why every living thing has consciousness: Survival! It's not "fitness" that provides the ability to survive it is consciousness and will that leads to survival. Darwin was confused. Nature never selected any trait at all but consciousness coupled with the possibility of survival leads to survival.But what is this supposed metaphysical language if not just magic that you're making up?
There's a simple reason that observational science works for animals and leads to every possible dead end for homo omnisciencis. Animal brains and other consciousness are all perfectly logical because they exist as a part of reality and reality itself is perfectly logical. Any organized system can become a science and animal languages are the metaphysics of animal progress. Human progress is faster because human language is more complex allowing each generation to build on the work of the previous. When a sparrow Plato is hatched it must start at the very beginning.
Humans can not use observational science because modern language forces us to reason in circles: Every single conclusion is necessarily dependent on assumptions unless experiment causes a tangential (correct) result. We must use experiment or we'd still be watching out for the Inquisition, or ghosts and goblins.
I already have, people don't listen. I haven't proved it here, obviously, but I have made several "impossible" predictions made on the basis of the only Ancient Language writing in existence. By our science this is simply "evidence" but in terms of ancient science this rises to the level of "proof".Can you prove that it exists?
Ancient Language, bird calls, bee's dances, computer code, static, and mathematics all break Zipf's Law and each has some metaphysical defining characteristics.
The language for machine intelligence will also break Zip's Law.
I'm not certain what the referent is here but I believe that no modern human language has any characteristics that are metaphysical other than some of the grammars. Words are always defined and abstract. They are symbolic and analog. This does not apply to metaphysical language.Also, natural languages all contain a degree of metaphysics even today, obviously.