Artificial Intelligence - advancements.

[attofishpi]

OMG. Check this video recently released re Googles "Gemini" AI.

Note - from 5:20 where Gemini demo is shown, mind blowing!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-a6E-r8W2Bs&t=465s

[attofishpi]

Turns out Google deceived us re their Gemini demo

(Matt Wolfe)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i6Dm4YhAe18&t=173s

[Age]

FURTHER PROOF of just HOW SIMPLY, EASILY, and EVEN HOW QUICKLY these adult human beings COULD BE and WERE BEING DECEIVED, DECEIVING "each other", AND "themselves".

'This one' ACTUALLY REFERRED TO THE DECEPTION and FOOLING AS 'mind blowing'. That WAS, UNTIL 'it' NEEDED ANOTHER 'human being' TO INFORM 'it' that 'it' HAD BEEN DECEIVED, and DECEIVED, TRICKED, and FOOLED ONCE AGAIN I will add.

[attofishpi]

You truly are a fuckwit. Both posters of the original Google Gemini demo vids above were duped, EVERYONE was until it was made clear by Google that they actually used text to prompt the AI to explain what it sees in the demo video.
It wasn't that the AI was just shown stuff and reacted of it's own volition, it was asked - and apparently the images were 'still' shots, not a continuous video.

The Gemini AI is still impressive and I'm keen to test it. ChatGPT just did 90% of the coding of a website I am working on for a client - took me far less time to get it up and running.

PS:- fuckoff Age you blithering idiot.

[LuckyR]

[Age]

You truly are a fuckwit.

Okay. iF 'you' SAY and BELIEVE SO, THEN 'I' MUST BE SO, TO 'you'.

Both posters of the original Google Gemini demo vids above were duped, EVERYONE was until it was made clear by Google that they actually used text to prompt the AI to explain what it sees in the demo video.

1. NOT EVERYONE.

2. WERE 'you' EXPECTING that so-called 'ai' KNEW 'the things' PURPORTED, ALL BY 'itself'? If yes, then NO WONDER 'you' WERE DUPED.

OF COURSE 'text', and/or 'speech', WAS USED TO 'prompt' 'ai' TO PROVIDE 'answers/explanations'. Were 'you' UNDER SOME SORT OF ILLUSION that 'ai' CAN DO what 'you', human beings, BACK THEN, Incorrectly called 'mind read'?

Did 'you' think or BELIEVE that if a human being just showed a picture or video to some 'ai' machine, then 'that machine' would just AUTOMATICALLY GIVE/PROVIDE what was being 'sought', in 'thought' ALONE, WITHIN 'that human being/s'?

It wasn't that the AI was just shown stuff and reacted of it's own volition, it was asked

OF COURSE.

- and apparently the images were 'still' shots, not a continuous video.

'you', adult human beings, BACK THEN, DID GET DUPED IN SO MANY WAYS.

But 'this' WAS BECAUSE OF the GREED, which ONCE EXISTED, BACK THEN, in 'those people'.

The Gemini AI is still impressive and I'm keen to test it.

Okay. "each", 'to their own', as some might say here.

ChatGPT just did 90% of the coding of a website I am working on for a client - took me far less time to get it up and running.

SOON ENOUGH 'you' WILL NOT BE NEEDED ANYMORE here, right?

PS:- fuckoff Age you blithering idiot.

SAYS 'the one' who was DUPED, and SO SIMPLY, QUICKLY, and EASILY I will add.

[Age]

And, human beings ARE, OF COURSE, ANIMALS, or CREATURES, if one prefers.

[LuckyR]

And, human beings ARE, OF COURSE, ANIMALS, or CREATURES, if one prefers.

Straight from the horse's mouth! Though my post wasn't sent TO you.

[Age]

And, human beings ARE, OF COURSE, ANIMALS, or CREATURES, if one prefers.

Straight from the horse's mouth!

'This one' now here thinks or BELIEVES that "age" IS A HORSE.

Though my post wasn't sent TO you.

I NEVER even THOUGHT 'it' WAS, LET ALONE EVER SAID nor WROTE ABSOLUTELY ANYWHERE that could have been IMPLIED as 'this'.

I was JUST POINTING OUT the IRREFUTABLE Fact that 'you', human beings, ARE ANIMALS.

Which WAS, and IS, JUST ANOTHER CLAIM I MADE here, which can NOT be REFUTED.