I NEVER SAID otherwise. 'you' ARE JUST ASSUMING I AM.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Wed Nov 01, 2023 12:19 pmI am no more nor less "human" than you are, Age.Age wrote: ↑Wed Nov 01, 2023 12:15 pmBut 'you', human beings, do NOT 'use physics'.
'you' USE 'matter', itself, to GET what 'it' IS that 'you' Truly WANT and DESIRE.
So, OBVIOUSLY, IF 'you' WANT or DESIRE 'money', then 'you' WILL USE 'matter', itself, to GET 'this', and ALSO GET ALL of what COMES-WITH WANTING and DESIRING what is NOT 'needed' IN Life. And, CONVERSELY, IF 'you' WANT or DESIRE Peace AND Harmony WITH EVERY one, as One, THEN 'that' IS what 'you' WILL GET, along WITH what COMES-WITH WANTING and DESIRING PEACE and HARMONY FOR EVERY one.
By the way, to 'you', FROM what 'you' just SAID here, 'Are 'you' SAYING and CLAIMING that the ANSWER to the QUESTION, 'Who AM 'I'?' IS 'human'.
IF 'you' HAD EVER ASKED 'me' TO DO 'this' here, then 'i' WOULD HAVE CONSIDERED DOING SO. However, TELLING 'me' what TO DO WILL NEVER WORK IN 'you' GETTING what 'it' IS that 'you' ARE WANTING NOR DESIRING? Is 'this' understood by 'you', "gary childress"?
ALSO, did 'you' REALLY NOT NOTICE the ABSOLUTE CONTRADICTION IN 'your' WORDS here, and just HOW HYPOCRITICAL it IS to CALL and LABEL "another", 'you', WHEN TELLING 'them' to NOT address 'you', as 'you', but rather as 'we'?
And, THEN to make 'that' MORE HYPOCRITICAL and CONTRADICTORY would be to ASK, 'Do 'you' understand me?'
WHY can "gary childress" SAY and WRITE to someone, ' If 'you' address 'me', then 'you' WILL USE the word 'we' and NOT the word 'you' ', but the "other" can NOT USE the word 'you'?
WHY is it APPROPRIATE "gary childress" can address "others" AS 'you', but 'they' can NOT address "gary childress" AS 'you'.