LuckyR wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 11:17 pm
The intersubjective are things that exist through agreement among humans, such as the legal system, the monetary system, gods, entities of human groups such as nations and corporations.
These entities cease to exist when humans no longer believe in them.
Besides the God word here it may well be true that what those other words are referring to will be gone when 'you', adult human beings, are gone, but what the God word refers to, EXACTLY, IS STILL HERE, when humans are NOT.
Spoken exactly like a believer. Thanks for proving my point.
LuckyR wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 11:17 pm
The intersubjective are things that exist through agreement among humans, such as the legal system, the monetary system, gods, entities of human groups such as nations and corporations.
These entities cease to exist when humans no longer believe in them.
Besides the God word here it may well be true that what those other words are referring to will be gone when 'you', adult human beings, are gone, but what the God word refers to, EXACTLY, IS STILL HERE, when humans are NOT.
Spoken exactly like a believer.
Speaking exactly LIKE 'a believer' in ABSOLUTELY NO WAY AT ALL MAKES 'that one' A BELIEVER.
So, thank 'you' for ALLOWING 'me' to BRING 'this POINT' to the FOREFRONT here, now.
And, thank 'you' for SHOWING and REVEALING HOW 'you' ARE a BELIEVER here "luckyr".
LuckyR wrote: ↑Tue Oct 24, 2023 7:30 am
Thanks for proving my point.
LuckyR wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 11:17 pm
The intersubjective are things that exist through agreement among humans, such as the legal system, the monetary system, gods, entities of human groups such as nations and corporations.
These entities cease to exist when humans no longer believe in them.
Besides the God word here it may well be true that what those other words are referring to will be gone when 'you', adult human beings, are gone, but what the God word refers to, EXACTLY, IS STILL HERE, when humans are NOT.
Spoken exactly like a believer. Thanks for proving my point.
Thank 'you', 'luckyr", for PROVING 'my point' ABOUT while ASSUMING and/or BELIEVING False, Wrong, AND Incorrect 'things', like 'you' ARE DOING HERE, AGAIN, 'you', human beings, WILL REMAIN LOST and CONFUSED. Just like 'this one' is SHOWING and PROVING here.
Besides the God word here it may well be true that what those other words are referring to will be gone when 'you', adult human beings, are gone, but what the God word refers to, EXACTLY, IS STILL HERE, when humans are NOT.
Spoken exactly like a believer. Thanks for proving my point.
Thank 'you', 'luckyr", for PROVING 'my point' ABOUT while ASSUMING and/or BELIEVING False, Wrong, AND Incorrect 'things', like 'you' ARE DOING HERE, AGAIN, 'you', human beings, WILL REMAIN LOST and CONFUSED. Just like 'this one' is SHOWING and PROVING here.
BTW, are you a human being? I ask because you're always making the distinction.
Spoken exactly like a believer. Thanks for proving my point.
Thank 'you', 'luckyr", for PROVING 'my point' ABOUT while ASSUMING and/or BELIEVING False, Wrong, AND Incorrect 'things', like 'you' ARE DOING HERE, AGAIN, 'you', human beings, WILL REMAIN LOST and CONFUSED. Just like 'this one' is SHOWING and PROVING here.
BTW, are you a human being?
The word 'you', to me, is referring to the 'person', and a 'person' is only a PART of the 'human being'.
When you USED the 'you' word here who and/or what were you referring to, EXACTLY?
LuckyR wrote: ↑Tue Oct 24, 2023 4:46 pm
I ask because you're always making the distinction.
Learning, understanding, AND knowing the ACTUAL 'distinction' between 'I', 'you', and 'i' is VERY IMPORTANT in learning, understanding, and knowing 'the way' towards Peace and Harmony FOR EVERY 'one', as One.
Thank 'you', 'luckyr", for PROVING 'my point' ABOUT while ASSUMING and/or BELIEVING False, Wrong, AND Incorrect 'things', like 'you' ARE DOING HERE, AGAIN, 'you', human beings, WILL REMAIN LOST and CONFUSED. Just like 'this one' is SHOWING and PROVING here.
BTW, are you a human being?
The word 'you', to me, is referring to the 'person', and a 'person' is only a PART of the 'human being'.
When you USED the 'you' word here who and/or what were you referring to, EXACTLY?
LuckyR wrote: ↑Tue Oct 24, 2023 4:46 pm
I ask because you're always making the distinction.
Learning, understanding, AND knowing the ACTUAL 'distinction' between 'I', 'you', and 'i' is VERY IMPORTANT in learning, understanding, and knowing 'the way' towards Peace and Harmony FOR EVERY 'one', as One.
Blah, blah, blah. 37 words (and a question) as response to a "yes" or "no" question. Says a lot...
The word 'you', to me, is referring to the 'person', and a 'person' is only a PART of the 'human being'.
When you USED the 'you' word here who and/or what were you referring to, EXACTLY?
LuckyR wrote: ↑Tue Oct 24, 2023 4:46 pm
I ask because you're always making the distinction.
Learning, understanding, AND knowing the ACTUAL 'distinction' between 'I', 'you', and 'i' is VERY IMPORTANT in learning, understanding, and knowing 'the way' towards Peace and Harmony FOR EVERY 'one', as One.
Blah, blah, blah. 37 words (and a question) as response to a "yes" or "no" question. Says a lot...
And what SHOWS and REVEALS a LOT is;
If 'you' can NOT even define a word 'you' USED in a question that 'you' asked, then HOW is ANY one "else" even MEANT TO KNOW HOW TO ANSWER 'that question', properly AND correctly?
