No. You've been holding "adult humans" accountable for what we do.
Binary
-
- Posts: 8632
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:08 pm
- Location: Professional Underdog Pound
Re: Binary
1. I have NOT 'held' ANY one ACCOUNT for what 'you' DO. I JUST ALLUDE TO and POINT OUT what 'you' DO, sometimes.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Wed Aug 30, 2023 1:54 pmNo. You've been holding "adult humans" accountable for what we do.
2. To be ABLE to HOLD "another" ACCOUNTABLE, for what 'they' SAY, then, OBVIOUSLY, one would HAVE TO BE FOCUSING ON 'the words' ALONE. This IS IRREFUTABLE.
3. I have been CONTINUALLY SAYING and STATING, throughout this forum here, TO FOCUS ON 'the words' ALONE, and NOT ON 'the perceived person', "them" 'self'. This, ALSO, IS IRREFUTABLE.
4. HOW, EXACTLY, do you ENVISION that 'I' HAVE BEEN HOLDING 'you', 'adult human beings' ACCOUNTABLE, for what 'you' DO?
-
- Posts: 8632
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:08 pm
- Location: Professional Underdog Pound
Re: Binary
A person is our mind, our words, our thoughts, and our actions. When we focus on one, we focus on all those aspects.Age wrote: ↑Wed Aug 30, 2023 3:18 pm1. I have NOT 'held' ANY one ACCOUNT for what 'you' DO. I JUST ALLUDE TO and POINT OUT what 'you' DO, sometimes.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Wed Aug 30, 2023 1:54 pmNo. You've been holding "adult humans" accountable for what we do.
2. To be ABLE to HOLD "another" ACCOUNTABLE, for what 'they' SAY, then, OBVIOUSLY, one would HAVE TO BE FOCUSING ON 'the words' ALONE. This IS IRREFUTABLE.
3. I have been CONTINUALLY SAYING and STATING, throughout this forum here, TO FOCUS ON 'the words' ALONE, and NOT ON 'the perceived person', "them" 'self'. This, ALSO, IS IRREFUTABLE.
4. HOW, EXACTLY, do you ENVISION that 'I' HAVE BEEN HOLDING 'you', 'adult human beings' ACCOUNTABLE, for what 'you' DO?
Re: Binary
REALLY?Gary Childress wrote: ↑Wed Aug 30, 2023 3:27 pmA person is our mind, our words, our thoughts, and our actions.Age wrote: ↑Wed Aug 30, 2023 3:18 pm1. I have NOT 'held' ANY one ACCOUNT for what 'you' DO. I JUST ALLUDE TO and POINT OUT what 'you' DO, sometimes.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Wed Aug 30, 2023 1:54 pm
No. You've been holding "adult humans" accountable for what we do.
2. To be ABLE to HOLD "another" ACCOUNTABLE, for what 'they' SAY, then, OBVIOUSLY, one would HAVE TO BE FOCUSING ON 'the words' ALONE. This IS IRREFUTABLE.
3. I have been CONTINUALLY SAYING and STATING, throughout this forum here, TO FOCUS ON 'the words' ALONE, and NOT ON 'the perceived person', "them" 'self'. This, ALSO, IS IRREFUTABLE.
4. HOW, EXACTLY, do you ENVISION that 'I' HAVE BEEN HOLDING 'you', 'adult human beings' ACCOUNTABLE, for what 'you' DO?
HOW CAN A 'person' BE 'our mind', 'our words', 'our thoughts', and 'our actions', EXACTLY?
WHO and/or WHAT IS AN 'our', EXACTLY?
WHO and/or WHAT does the 'we' word here REFER TO, EXACTLY?Gary Childress wrote: ↑Wed Aug 30, 2023 3:27 pm When we focus on one, we focus on all those aspects.
ALSO, WHY did 'you' ANSWER some QUESTION, which I NEVER ASKED, but FAILED TO ANSWER ANY of the ACTUAL CLARIFYING QUESTIONS, which I ACTUALLY ASKED.
-
- Posts: 8632
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:08 pm
- Location: Professional Underdog Pound
Re: Binary
What do you mean by "how can a person be our mind, our words, our thoughts, and our actions? Is there some aspect of personhood that my list is missing or is there some other reason you're asking or answer you are looking for? Do you wish to say that none of those aspects are part of a person?Age wrote: ↑Wed Aug 30, 2023 3:45 pmREALLY?Gary Childress wrote: ↑Wed Aug 30, 2023 3:27 pmA person is our mind, our words, our thoughts, and our actions.Age wrote: ↑Wed Aug 30, 2023 3:18 pm
1. I have NOT 'held' ANY one ACCOUNT for what 'you' DO. I JUST ALLUDE TO and POINT OUT what 'you' DO, sometimes.
2. To be ABLE to HOLD "another" ACCOUNTABLE, for what 'they' SAY, then, OBVIOUSLY, one would HAVE TO BE FOCUSING ON 'the words' ALONE. This IS IRREFUTABLE.
3. I have been CONTINUALLY SAYING and STATING, throughout this forum here, TO FOCUS ON 'the words' ALONE, and NOT ON 'the perceived person', "them" 'self'. This, ALSO, IS IRREFUTABLE.
4. HOW, EXACTLY, do you ENVISION that 'I' HAVE BEEN HOLDING 'you', 'adult human beings' ACCOUNTABLE, for what 'you' DO?
HOW CAN A 'person' BE 'our mind', 'our words', 'our thoughts', and 'our actions', EXACTLY?
"Our" is "us" is "person" is "humanity" is "mankind" (or womankind) is __[feel free to insert your equivalent word]__.WHO and/or WHAT IS AN 'our', EXACTLY?
Re: Binary
YES.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Wed Aug 30, 2023 3:59 pmWhat do you mean by "how can a person be our mind, our words, our thoughts, and our actions? Is there some aspect of personhood that my list is missingAge wrote: ↑Wed Aug 30, 2023 3:45 pmREALLY?Gary Childress wrote: ↑Wed Aug 30, 2023 3:27 pm
A person is our mind, our words, our thoughts, and our actions.
HOW CAN A 'person' BE 'our mind', 'our words', 'our thoughts', and 'our actions', EXACTLY?
AND THAT IS; What the word 'our' MEANS or REFERS TO, EXACTLY.
I have ASKED what I HAVE. Of which you have ANSWERED NONE.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Wed Aug 30, 2023 3:59 pm or is there some other reason you're asking or answer you are looking for?
There could be NO 'other' ANSWER I am LOOKING FOR here OTHER THAN the ONES RELATED TO the ACTUAL QUESTIONS that I have ALREADY posed, and ASKED.
Some 'things' RELATE DIRECTLY TO what A 'person' IS, EXACTLY. While 'other things' could NOT BE ANY FURTHER AWAY.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Wed Aug 30, 2023 3:59 pm Do you wish to say that none of those aspects are part of a person?
So, what 'you' ARE ESSENTIALLY SAYING and CLAIMING here IS:Gary Childress wrote: ↑Wed Aug 30, 2023 3:59 pm"Our" is "us" is "person" is "humanity" is "mankind" (or womankind) is __[feel free to insert your equivalent word]__.WHO and/or WHAT IS AN 'our', EXACTLY?
A 'person' IS A 'person'.
See, if 'our' IS 'person', and 'person' IS 'our ...', then, ESSENTIALLY, A 'person' IS A 'person'.
Which WAS about ALL 'these persons' could WORK OUT, and FATHOM. BACK in the days when this WAS being written.
-
- Posts: 8632
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:08 pm
- Location: Professional Underdog Pound
Re: Binary
Are you a person also, Age?Age wrote: ↑Wed Aug 30, 2023 4:08 pmYES.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Wed Aug 30, 2023 3:59 pmWhat do you mean by "how can a person be our mind, our words, our thoughts, and our actions? Is there some aspect of personhood that my list is missing
AND THAT IS; What the word 'our' MEANS or REFERS TO, EXACTLY.
I have ASKED what I HAVE. Of which you have ANSWERED NONE.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Wed Aug 30, 2023 3:59 pm or is there some other reason you're asking or answer you are looking for?
There could be NO 'other' ANSWER I am LOOKING FOR here OTHER THAN the ONES RELATED TO the ACTUAL QUESTIONS that I have ALREADY posed, and ASKED.Some 'things' RELATE DIRECTLY TO what A 'person' IS, EXACTLY. While 'other things' could NOT BE ANY FURTHER AWAY.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Wed Aug 30, 2023 3:59 pm Do you wish to say that none of those aspects are part of a person?So, what 'you' ARE ESSENTIALLY SAYING and CLAIMING here IS:Gary Childress wrote: ↑Wed Aug 30, 2023 3:59 pm"Our" is "us" is "person" is "humanity" is "mankind" (or womankind) is __[feel free to insert your equivalent word]__.WHO and/or WHAT IS AN 'our', EXACTLY?
A 'person' IS A 'person'.
See, if 'our' IS 'person', and 'person' IS 'our ...', then, ESSENTIALLY, A 'person' IS A 'person'.
Which WAS about ALL 'these persons' could WORK OUT, and FATHOM. BACK in the days when this WAS being written.
Re: Binary
LOL 'This' IS A VERY FUNNY QUESTION TO ASK 'now', especially considering that 'you' WERE JUST COMPLETELY INCAPABLE OF DEFINING what A 'person' IS, EXACTLY, and SUCCESSFULLY.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Wed Aug 30, 2023 4:34 pmAre you a person also, Age?Age wrote: ↑Wed Aug 30, 2023 4:08 pmYES.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Wed Aug 30, 2023 3:59 pm
What do you mean by "how can a person be our mind, our words, our thoughts, and our actions? Is there some aspect of personhood that my list is missing
AND THAT IS; What the word 'our' MEANS or REFERS TO, EXACTLY.
I have ASKED what I HAVE. Of which you have ANSWERED NONE.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Wed Aug 30, 2023 3:59 pm or is there some other reason you're asking or answer you are looking for?
There could be NO 'other' ANSWER I am LOOKING FOR here OTHER THAN the ONES RELATED TO the ACTUAL QUESTIONS that I have ALREADY posed, and ASKED.Some 'things' RELATE DIRECTLY TO what A 'person' IS, EXACTLY. While 'other things' could NOT BE ANY FURTHER AWAY.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Wed Aug 30, 2023 3:59 pm Do you wish to say that none of those aspects are part of a person?So, what 'you' ARE ESSENTIALLY SAYING and CLAIMING here IS:Gary Childress wrote: ↑Wed Aug 30, 2023 3:59 pm
"Our" is "us" is "person" is "humanity" is "mankind" (or womankind) is __[feel free to insert your equivalent word]__.
A 'person' IS A 'person'.
See, if 'our' IS 'person', and 'person' IS 'our ...', then, ESSENTIALLY, A 'person' IS A 'person'.
Which WAS about ALL 'these persons' could WORK OUT, and FATHOM. BACK in the days when this WAS being written.
-
- Posts: 8632
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:08 pm
- Location: Professional Underdog Pound
Re: Binary
Are people like unicorns, we don't exist?Age wrote: ↑Thu Aug 31, 2023 2:14 amLOL 'This' IS A VERY FUNNY QUESTION TO ASK 'now', especially considering that 'you' WERE JUST COMPLETELY INCAPABLE OF DEFINING what A 'person' IS, EXACTLY, and SUCCESSFULLY.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Wed Aug 30, 2023 4:34 pmAre you a person also, Age?Age wrote: ↑Wed Aug 30, 2023 4:08 pm
YES.
AND THAT IS; What the word 'our' MEANS or REFERS TO, EXACTLY.
I have ASKED what I HAVE. Of which you have ANSWERED NONE.
There could be NO 'other' ANSWER I am LOOKING FOR here OTHER THAN the ONES RELATED TO the ACTUAL QUESTIONS that I have ALREADY posed, and ASKED.
Some 'things' RELATE DIRECTLY TO what A 'person' IS, EXACTLY. While 'other things' could NOT BE ANY FURTHER AWAY.
So, what 'you' ARE ESSENTIALLY SAYING and CLAIMING here IS:
A 'person' IS A 'person'.
See, if 'our' IS 'person', and 'person' IS 'our ...', then, ESSENTIALLY, A 'person' IS A 'person'.
Which WAS about ALL 'these persons' could WORK OUT, and FATHOM. BACK in the days when this WAS being written.
Re: Binary
SEE HOW 'they' 'TRY TO' DEFLECT or IGNORE WHEN the CONTRADICTIONS, INACCURACIES, INCONSISTENCIES, or HYPOCRISY is POINTED OUT and SHOWN BACK TO 'them'.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Thu Aug 31, 2023 3:12 amAre people like unicorns, we don't exist?
Explaining WHO and/or WHAT 'you', persons, ARE, is what 'you', "gary childress", STARTED 'TRYING TO' do here.
'you', people, CERTAINLY DO exist. BUT, in what ACTUAL FORM 'you', people, in the days when this is being written, are STILL TRYING TO WORK OUT, and CONCLUDE.
-
- Posts: 8632
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:08 pm
- Location: Professional Underdog Pound
Re: Binary
People are eternal, Age. Would you like to join us?Age wrote: ↑Thu Aug 31, 2023 4:31 amSEE HOW 'they' 'TRY TO' DEFLECT or IGNORE WHEN the CONTRADICTIONS, INACCURACIES, INCONSISTENCIES, or HYPOCRISY is POINTED OUT and SHOWN BACK TO 'them'.
Explaining WHO and/or WHAT 'you', persons, ARE, is what 'you', "gary childress", STARTED 'TRYING TO' do here.
'you', people, CERTAINLY DO exist. BUT, in what ACTUAL FORM 'you', people, in the days when this is being written, are STILL TRYING TO WORK OUT, and CONCLUDE.
Re: Binary
See the ABSURDITY that some would go on with?Gary Childress wrote: ↑Thu Aug 31, 2023 1:53 pmPeople are eternal, Age. Would you like to join us?Age wrote: ↑Thu Aug 31, 2023 4:31 amSEE HOW 'they' 'TRY TO' DEFLECT or IGNORE WHEN the CONTRADICTIONS, INACCURACIES, INCONSISTENCIES, or HYPOCRISY is POINTED OUT and SHOWN BACK TO 'them'.
Explaining WHO and/or WHAT 'you', persons, ARE, is what 'you', "gary childress", STARTED 'TRYING TO' do here.
'you', people, CERTAINLY DO exist. BUT, in what ACTUAL FORM 'you', people, in the days when this is being written, are STILL TRYING TO WORK OUT, and CONCLUDE.
-
- Posts: 8632
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:08 pm
- Location: Professional Underdog Pound
Re: Binary
Absurdity is all I have for you right now, Age. Would you like something different from me?Age wrote: ↑Thu Aug 31, 2023 2:12 pmSee the ABSURDITY that some would go on with?Gary Childress wrote: ↑Thu Aug 31, 2023 1:53 pmPeople are eternal, Age. Would you like to join us?Age wrote: ↑Thu Aug 31, 2023 4:31 am
SEE HOW 'they' 'TRY TO' DEFLECT or IGNORE WHEN the CONTRADICTIONS, INACCURACIES, INCONSISTENCIES, or HYPOCRISY is POINTED OUT and SHOWN BACK TO 'them'.
Explaining WHO and/or WHAT 'you', persons, ARE, is what 'you', "gary childress", STARTED 'TRYING TO' do here.
'you', people, CERTAINLY DO exist. BUT, in what ACTUAL FORM 'you', people, in the days when this is being written, are STILL TRYING TO WORK OUT, and CONCLUDE.
Re: Binary
NO. ONLY what 'you' GOT.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Thu Aug 31, 2023 2:14 pmAbsurdity is all I have for you right now, Age. Would you like something different from me?