Universal Consciousness

[Age]

So all is not one? Or is it?

In regards to 'what', EXACTLY?

The "all".

you seem to be MISSING THE MARK, or JUST MISUNDERSTANDING, here.

[Eodnhoj7]

The 'reader/s' who can SEE that you have NOT ANSWERED the QUESTIONS.


If the 'can' word here was meant to mean 'an', then the ANSWER IS NO one.

I was just ASKING you ANOTHER CLARIFYING QUESTION, which, by the way, you just, ONCE AGAIN, 'tried to' DEFLECT AWAY FROM.

And who are the reader(s)?

The ones who read, OBVIOUSLY.

If I don't owe you an answer then why ask questions?

To SEE if you are OPEN and Honest, or NOT.

1. And who are they?

2. And why does me being open and honest matter to you?

[Eodnhoj7]

In regards to 'what', EXACTLY?

The "all".

you seem to be MISSING THE MARK, or JUST MISUNDERSTANDING, here.

How can I miss the mark when things just are?

[Age]

And who are the reader(s)?

The ones who read, OBVIOUSLY.

If I don't owe you an answer then why ask questions?

To SEE if you are OPEN and Honest, or NOT.

1. And who are they?

So you want their names, individually, or smaller collective names. Either way 'they' can, and will, infirm you if 'they' could be bothered. Does it matter to you either way?

2. And why does me being open and honest matter to you?

But it does NOT matter to me. I was just curious to see what you actually do and do not know, and how open and honest you really were.

[Age]

The "all".

you seem to be MISSING THE MARK, or JUST MISUNDERSTANDING, here.

How can I miss the mark when things just are?

VERY EASILY.

[Eodnhoj7]

The ones who read, OBVIOUSLY.


To SEE if you are OPEN and Honest, or NOT.

1. And who are they?

So you want their names, individually, or smaller collective names. Either way 'they' can, and will, infirm you if 'they' could be bothered. Does it matter to you either way?

2. And why does me being open and honest matter to you?

But it does NOT matter to me. I was just curious to see what you actually do and do not know, and how open and honest you really were.

1. Group perspective falls under the bandwagon fallacy.

2. So it does matter to you because of your curiosity?

[Eodnhoj7]

you seem to be MISSING THE MARK, or JUST MISUNDERSTANDING, here.

How can I miss the mark when things just are?

VERY EASILY.

1. And what does that mean if all things are relative?

[Age]

1. And who are they?

So you want their names, individually, or smaller collective names. Either way 'they' can, and will, infirm you if 'they' could be bothered. Does it matter to you either way?

2. And why does me being open and honest matter to you?

But it does NOT matter to me. I was just curious to see what you actually do and do not know, and how open and honest you really were.

1. Group perspective falls under the bandwagon fallacy.

SO, WHY did 'you' WANT 'the group's' names FOR, EXACTLY?

2. So it does matter to you because of your curiosity?

But 'your' COMPLETE and UTTER INABILITY here to be JUST, OPEN, and Honest, is of NO REAL 'matter' to 'me', NOW, especially considering 'you' have ALREADY PROVED, IRREFUTABLY, True what I have SAID, and CLAIMED, ABOUT 'you', human beings, BACK, in the days when this WAS being written.

[Age]

How can I miss the mark when things just are?

VERY EASILY.

1. And what does that mean if all things are relative?

'It' does NOT necessarily MEAN ANY 'thing' AT ALL.

I JUST ANSWERED the ACTUAL QUESTION, which 'you' had posed, and had ASKED 'me' here.

'That' is WHAT 'that' ESSENTIALLY MEANS.