'it' would ALSO BE EXPRESSED here for what 'it' REALLY IS. WHICH, does MATTER to SOME or a LOT of readers.
The Contradiction of the Point
Re: The Contradiction of the Point
Yet your knowledge does nothing for you and still you argue that the absolute oneness, you claim to know, is not nothing.
How can you speak for others when you have stated that I cannot speak for others (even thought dontaskme, agent smith, and sometimes skepdick agrees with me)? If we are not one then you cannot state everything is one.
Re: The Contradiction of the Point
How could SOME 'thing' be NO 'thing'?
BECAUSE it all depends on what is being talking ABOUT, EXACTLY.
In regards to 'what', EXACTLY?
And, would you have ANY issue if I CONFIRM 'this', WITH 'them'?
But WHO states 'we' are NOT 'one'?
Re: The Contradiction of the Point
Why the curiosity considering your perspective that 'all is one' necessitates you as having no separation from all the knowledge out there?Age wrote: ↑Sun Jun 25, 2023 6:26 amHow could SOME 'thing' be NO 'thing'?BECAUSE it all depends on what is being talking ABOUT, EXACTLY.
In regards to 'what', EXACTLY?
And, would you have ANY issue if I CONFIRM 'this', WITH 'them'?
But WHO states 'we' are NOT 'one'?
Re: The Contradiction of the Point
I do not understand your question here.Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2023 11:05 pmWhy the curiosity considering your perspective that 'all is one' necessitates you as having no separation from all the knowledge out there?
Re: The Contradiction of the Point
Then you are not one with me and if you are not one with me you cannot state everything is one.
But I will explain.
Curiosity necessitates a search for truth. This search for truth necessitates an absence of truth within the observer otherwise there is no search for truth if one already has it. You lack knowledge thus are separate from what you lack. This separation necessitates you are not one with the universe.
Re: The Contradiction of the Point
BUT I can state WHATEVER I like and want to.
WHY do you BELIEVE that I can NOT?
And 'you' being 'one' with "another" does NOT even make logical sense anyway.
Okay, if you say and believe so.
Okay.
LOL WHY would you even BEGIN to ASSUME that ANY 'you' was NOT 'separate'?
Do 'you' even KNOW what a 'you', IS, EXACTLY?
If yes, then what are 'you', EXACTLY?
'you' are completely AND utterly MISSING the POINT here, ONCE MORE and AGAIN.
And, the REASON FOR 'this' is VERY OBVIOUS, right?
Re: The Contradiction of the Point
"BUT I can state WHATEVER I like and want to" if you can.Age wrote: ↑Sat Jul 01, 2023 8:25 amBUT I can state WHATEVER I like and want to.
WHY do you BELIEVE that I can NOT?
And 'you' being 'one' with "another" does NOT even make logical sense anyway.
Okay, if you say and believe so.
Okay.LOL WHY would you even BEGIN to ASSUME that ANY 'you' was NOT 'separate'?
Do 'you' even KNOW what a 'you', IS, EXACTLY?
If yes, then what are 'you', EXACTLY?
'you' are completely AND utterly MISSING the POINT here, ONCE MORE and AGAIN.
And, the REASON FOR 'this' is VERY OBVIOUS, right?
Re: The Contradiction of the Point
Has ANY even 'thought' OTHERWISE?Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 05, 2023 3:36 pm"BUT I can state WHATEVER I like and want to" if you can.Age wrote: ↑Sat Jul 01, 2023 8:25 amBUT I can state WHATEVER I like and want to.
WHY do you BELIEVE that I can NOT?
And 'you' being 'one' with "another" does NOT even make logical sense anyway.
Okay, if you say and believe so.
Okay.LOL WHY would you even BEGIN to ASSUME that ANY 'you' was NOT 'separate'?
Do 'you' even KNOW what a 'you', IS, EXACTLY?
If yes, then what are 'you', EXACTLY?
'you' are completely AND utterly MISSING the POINT here, ONCE MORE and AGAIN.
And, the REASON FOR 'this' is VERY OBVIOUS, right?
If yes, then WHO, EXACTLY?
But if no, then WHY STATE such a 'thing' as what you did just here?
Re: The Contradiction of the Point
Why does there have to be an answer?Age wrote: ↑Wed Jul 05, 2023 4:20 pmHas ANY even 'thought' OTHERWISE?Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 05, 2023 3:36 pm"BUT I can state WHATEVER I like and want to" if you can.Age wrote: ↑Sat Jul 01, 2023 8:25 am
BUT I can state WHATEVER I like and want to.
WHY do you BELIEVE that I can NOT?
And 'you' being 'one' with "another" does NOT even make logical sense anyway.
Okay, if you say and believe so.
Okay.
LOL WHY would you even BEGIN to ASSUME that ANY 'you' was NOT 'separate'?
Do 'you' even KNOW what a 'you', IS, EXACTLY?
If yes, then what are 'you', EXACTLY?
'you' are completely AND utterly MISSING the POINT here, ONCE MORE and AGAIN.
And, the REASON FOR 'this' is VERY OBVIOUS, right?
If yes, then WHO, EXACTLY?
But if no, then WHY STATE such a 'thing' as what you did just here?
Re: The Contradiction of the Point
Re: The Contradiction of the Point
1. What is your issue with your apparent complete inability to just answer questions posed and asked to you?
2. What rational claims have I made when I point to contradictions?
Re: The Contradiction of the Point
BUT I DO NOT HAVE ANY ISSUE.
As can be CLEARLY SEEN and PROVED here. As I ANSWER the QUESTIONS posed, and ASKED TO me.
you INABILITY to just ANSWER here AGAIN, is SHOWING just how MUCH of an ISSUE you REALLY HAVE here.
Have you made ANY 'rational claims'?
If yes, then WHERE and WHAT, EXACTLY?
Re: The Contradiction of the Point
1. That is your belief.Age wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2023 9:53 amBUT I DO NOT HAVE ANY ISSUE.
As can be CLEARLY SEEN and PROVED here. As I ANSWER the QUESTIONS posed, and ASKED TO me.
you INABILITY to just ANSWER here AGAIN, is SHOWING just how MUCH of an ISSUE you REALLY HAVE here.Have you made ANY 'rational claims'?
If yes, then WHERE and WHAT, EXACTLY?
2. A point divided results in further points.
Re: The Contradiction of the Point
WHAT do you ASSUME or BELIEVE is my so-called and alleged 'belief' here?Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 07, 2023 7:19 pm1. That is your belief.Age wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2023 9:53 amBUT I DO NOT HAVE ANY ISSUE.
As can be CLEARLY SEEN and PROVED here. As I ANSWER the QUESTIONS posed, and ASKED TO me.
you INABILITY to just ANSWER here AGAIN, is SHOWING just how MUCH of an ISSUE you REALLY HAVE here.Have you made ANY 'rational claims'?
If yes, then WHERE and WHAT, EXACTLY?
Is 'this' YOUR so-called, and alleged, 'rational claim'?