No Humans = no FSK-ed Reality

Should you think about your duty, or about the consequences of your actions? Or should you concentrate on becoming a good person?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Post Reply
Veritas Aequitas
Posts: 12244
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 4:41 am

No Humans = no FSK-ed Reality

Post by Veritas Aequitas »

Peter Holmes wrote: Sun Jun 04, 2023 3:12 pm To repeat my question for VA, ........

What evidence do you have for the astonishingly unscientific claim that no humans = no reality?
I have already explained to you many times.

There are two senses of reality in contention, i.e.
  • 1. FSK-ed reality [evolutionary embedded in all humans]

    2. P-realist reality independent of the existence of humans.
I have demonstrated your version of reality in 2 is illusory.

PH's Philosophical Realism is Illusory
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=39992

PH's What is Fact [independent] is Illusory
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=39577

My FSK-ed reality is most realistic.
FSK-ed implied it CANNOT be independent of the existence of humans*.
Therefore if there are no humans, there is no FSK-ed reality.

*other than Peter Holmes, "independent of the existence of humans" is generally accepted without doubt as simply "mind-independent"
Veritas Aequitas
Posts: 12244
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 4:41 am

Re: No Humans = no FSK-ed Reality

Post by Veritas Aequitas »

Notes: to KIV
User avatar
FlashDangerpants
Posts: 6212
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:54 pm

Re: No Humans = no FSK-ed Reality

Post by FlashDangerpants »

Finally we get reality-proper
User avatar
Harbal
Posts: 9452
Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2013 10:03 pm
Location: Yorkshire
Contact:

Re: No Humans = no FSK-ed Reality

Post by Harbal »

Veritas Aequitas wrote: Mon Jun 05, 2023 5:06 am
Peter Holmes wrote: Sun Jun 04, 2023 3:12 pm To repeat my question for VA, ........

What evidence do you have for the astonishingly unscientific claim that no humans = no reality?
I have already explained to you many times.

There are two senses of reality in contention, i.e.
  • 1. FSK-ed reality [evolutionary embedded in all humans]

    2. P-realist reality independent of the existence of humans.
I have demonstrated your version of reality in 2 is illusory.

PH's Philosophical Realism is Illusory
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=39992

PH's What is Fact [independent] is Illusory
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=39577

My FSK-ed reality is most realistic.
FSK-ed implied it CANNOT be independent of the existence of humans*.
Therefore if there are no humans, there is no FSK-ed reality.

*other than Peter Holmes, "independent of the existence of humans" is generally accepted without doubt as simply "mind-independent"
I am still unable to work out whether you are bad at philosophy, or just bad at explaining yourself. Probably a bit of both. :?
Post Reply