Anyone that believes that there was sufficient election fraud in the 2020 election to overturn the election absent any evidence of this is a gullible fool by definition.wtf wrote: ↑Sun May 28, 2023 9:36 pmYou mean the Democrats in 2016?PeteOlcott wrote: ↑Sun May 28, 2023 2:11 pm Actually they are simply gullible fools that act like a herd of sheep because of groupthink. They make the huge mistake of believing that there was election fraud entirely on the basis that other people say that they believe it too.
As long as True(L,x) remains uncomputable humanity may soon perish
-
- Posts: 1556
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2016 6:55 pm
Re: As long as True(L,x) remains uncomputable humanity may soon perish
Re: As long as True(L,x) remains uncomputable humanity may soon perish
I see you avoided responding to the point I made.PeteOlcott wrote: ↑Sun May 28, 2023 10:03 pm
Anyone that believes that there was sufficient election fraud in the 2020 election to overturn the election absent any evidence of this is a gullible fool by definition.
-
- Posts: 1556
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2016 6:55 pm
Re: As long as True(L,x) remains uncomputable humanity may soon perish
I have hard facts you have only rhetoricwtf wrote: ↑Sun May 28, 2023 10:19 pmI see you avoided responding to the point I made.PeteOlcott wrote: ↑Sun May 28, 2023 10:03 pm
Anyone that believes that there was sufficient election fraud in the 2020 election to overturn the election absent any evidence of this is a gullible fool by definition.
https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2 ... ion-trump/
Re: As long as True(L,x) remains uncomputable humanity may soon perish
It's incredible. Twice now you've totally ignored what I said; and avoided engaging with my point by responding to something I didn't say.
-
- Posts: 1556
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2016 6:55 pm
Re: As long as True(L,x) remains uncomputable humanity may soon perish
Re: As long as True(L,x) remains uncomputable humanity may soon perish
That many Democrats thought the 2016 election was stolen? Are you making a bad joke? You're denying Democrats claimed Trump stole the 2016 election? That's a silly thing to say. Many Democrats still believe it. You can have the last word. You're not a serious person.PeteOlcott wrote: ↑Mon May 29, 2023 4:59 am I take what you said as empty rhetoric having no factual basis.
-
- Posts: 1556
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2016 6:55 pm
Re: As long as True(L,x) remains uncomputable humanity may soon perish
Provide a link.wtf wrote: ↑Mon May 29, 2023 5:07 amThat many Democrats thought the 2016 election was stolen? Are you making a bad joke? You're denying Democrats claimed Trump stole the 2016 election? That's a silly thing to say. Many Democrats still believe it. You can have the last word. You're not a serious person.PeteOlcott wrote: ↑Mon May 29, 2023 4:59 am I take what you said as empty rhetoric having no factual basis.
Re: As long as True(L,x) remains uncomputable humanity may soon perish
12 minutes of Democrats claiming the 2016 election was stolen. It's ridiculous for me to need to document the fact that many Democrats made this claim after the 2016 election but here you go.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XX2Ejqjz6TA
Re: As long as True(L,x) remains uncomputable humanity may soon perish
Okay BUT NONE of 'this' has absolutely ANY thing to do what what I SAID and WROTE herePeteOlcott wrote: ↑Sun May 28, 2023 2:11 pmActually they are simply gullible fools that act like a herd of sheep because of groupthink. They make the huge mistake of believing that there was election fraud entirely on the basis that other people say that they believe it too. Republican congress simply knowingly lies about this.Age wrote: ↑Sun May 28, 2023 5:51 amAh, so to you if some thing is not yet being done then it MUST BE HARD and COMPLEX.PeteOlcott wrote: ↑Sat May 27, 2023 6:47 pm
Proving that the {VERY SIMPLE and VERY EASY} is simply incorrect.
Here we can CLEARLY SEE the "justifications" these people would USE, to "themselves“ ONLY, for NIT DOING what is OBVIOUSLY Right and GOOD.
Re: As long as True(L,x) remains uncomputable humanity may soon perish
Well, considering the Fact that computers base what is 'true' and 'not true' on ONLY what human beings PROGRAM INTO computers, you are NEVER going to design what you are 'TRYING TO' here.PeteOlcott wrote: ↑Sun May 28, 2023 8:54 pmI am trying to design the basis of a formal computational system thatpopeye1945 wrote: ↑Sun May 28, 2023 8:03 pm Enlighten me by pointing out my faulty reasoning.
It suggest whatever semantics or complications are introduced it must come down to the conscious subjects experience, you are correct in thinking this is not abstract, this is basic biological reality.
can take on each end every social media post that is spreading
counter-factual disinformation and argue against these dangerous
lies before they can have any effect.
Could your BELIEF here be somewhat over exaggerated AT ALL here?PeteOlcott wrote: ↑Sun May 28, 2023 8:54 pm Since the survival of the species depends on the success of this
your naysaying is unhelpful.
Do you REALLY BELIEVE that the survival of the WHILE human being species depends on you, or someone "else", designing some 'thing', which essentially could NOT even come to exist?
-
- Posts: 1556
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2016 6:55 pm
Re: As long as True(L,x) remains uncomputable humanity may soon perish
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump campaign’s interactions with Russian intelligence services during the 2016 presidential election posed a “grave” counterintelligence threat, a Senate panel concluded Tuesday as it detailed how associates of Donald Trump had regular contact with Russians and expected to benefit from the Kremlin’s help.wtf wrote: ↑Mon May 29, 2023 5:51 am12 minutes of Democrats claiming the 2016 election was stolen. It's ridiculous for me to need to document the fact that many Democrats made this claim after the 2016 election but here you go.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XX2Ejqjz6TA
The nearly 1,000-page report, the fifth and final one from the Republican-led Senate intelligence committee on the Russia investigation, details how Russia launched an aggressive effort to interfere in the election on Trump’s behalf. It says the Trump campaign chairman had regular contact with a Russian intelligence officer and says other Trump associates were eager to exploit the Kremlin’s aid, particularly by maximizing the impact of the disclosure of Democratic emails hacked by Russian intelligence officers.
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/s ... s-election
Re: As long as True(L,x) remains uncomputable humanity may soon perish
Not seeing any evidence of election fraud.PeteOlcott wrote: ↑Mon May 29, 2023 12:52 pmWASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump campaign’s interactions with Russian intelligence services during the 2016 presidential election posed a “grave” counterintelligence threat, a Senate panel concluded Tuesday as it detailed how associates of Donald Trump had regular contact with Russians and expected to benefit from the Kremlin’s help.wtf wrote: ↑Mon May 29, 2023 5:51 am12 minutes of Democrats claiming the 2016 election was stolen. It's ridiculous for me to need to document the fact that many Democrats made this claim after the 2016 election but here you go.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XX2Ejqjz6TA
The nearly 1,000-page report, the fifth and final one from the Republican-led Senate intelligence committee on the Russia investigation, details how Russia launched an aggressive effort to interfere in the election on Trump’s behalf. It says the Trump campaign chairman had regular contact with a Russian intelligence officer and says other Trump associates were eager to exploit the Kremlin’s aid, particularly by maximizing the impact of the disclosure of Democratic emails hacked by Russian intelligence officers.
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/s ... s-election
Election manipulation? Sure.
Influencing hearts and minds? Sure.
Unethical behaviour? Sure.
Undermining of the democracy? Sure.
But fraud?!?! Where is the evidence?
-
- Posts: 1556
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2016 6:55 pm
Re: As long as True(L,x) remains uncomputable humanity may soon perish
You are the one that claimed there was evidence of election fraud
in the 2016 election. I did not make this claim.
in the 2016 election. I did not make this claim.
Re: As long as True(L,x) remains uncomputable humanity may soon perish
Context...context...context...PeteOlcott wrote: ↑Sat May 27, 2023 2:53 amSure maybe baby kittens really are some kind of ten story office building in some psychotic context.
I say that {baby kittens} <are not> {ten story office buildings} within the axiomatic correct model
of the world.
In one context a baby kitten is a skyscraper as both are the relation of atoms.
In another context a baby kitten is a skyscraper from the viewpoint of a bug.
And who is to say what the "axiomatic correct model of the world" is when the axiom must first be non-computably accepted?
Re: As long as True(L,x) remains uncomputable humanity may soon perish
If there is only a finite set of general abstract knowledge of the world then the simple axiom of the line cannot be said to be infinite nor composed of infinite lines/points. If there is one infinite axiom then we cannot say that there is "a finite set of general abstract knowledge of the world".PeteOlcott wrote: ↑Sat May 27, 2023 2:56 amThere is only a finite set of general abstract knowledge of the world.Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 9:27 pmAnd you would require a potential computer program beyond that one, and beyond that one....so on to infinity. This never ending potential always requires the program as being dependent on something which is not a program until the new program emerges.PeteOlcott wrote: ↑Thu May 18, 2023 3:06 am
That seems to be asking can you run a computer program that no one ever wrote and thus does not yet exist?
LLM's can self-populate in a feasible amount of time.
The CYC project spent 700 man-years just to populate human common sense.