Let's have a look at the definition of the word "sexist":
In which case, the only way in which you accusing me of being "sexist" would have made any sense is if you would have said:The Dictionary wrote: sexist
ADJECTIVE
1. characterized by or showing prejudice, stereotyping, or discrimination, typically against women, on the basis of sex...
"...Why are only "male" sexual predators, and "male" pedophiles, and "story hour" drag queens like this "guy"...
...being singled out?..."
In other words, your accusation is woefully misplaced.
I'm not sure of what to infer from that admission. Do you have something that you would like to confess to us?Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 8:49 pm I'm not actually in favor of "indecent exposure" laws, by the way.
Is the above image of the mini-skirted drag queen - exposing his crotch to children - okay with you?
Do you feel that all of us modern-day humans should finally free ourselves - once and for all - from any and all remnants of Victorian Age notions of modesty, and simply walk around our cities and work places with the same uninhibited attitude as these folks do in the Amazonian jungle?...
I'm thinking that if we really put our minds to the task, then perhaps we can return to a level of group consciousness where we are no longer even aware of our nakedness - kind of like good ol' Adam and Eve were...
...just prior to that unfortunate talking snake and apple-swiping fiasco.
Come to think of it, based on the fact that millions of (devolving) humans believe that this guy is a wise and benevolent leader,...
...then it appears that we're already heading in that direction.
Setting aside all of the above, I'm still having trouble understanding why an old grandpa (or is it grandma?) such as yourself, seem to have a problem when it comes to ensuring the safety and privacy rights of little girls?
Please assure us, grandpa, that it has nothing to do with you "...not being in favor of indecent exposure laws..."
_______