If you have such an argument feel free to open a new thread and present it there.Age wrote: ↑Sat Jul 02, 2022 1:12 amHow about starting ANY and ALL arguments from what IS IRREFUTABLY True, Right, and/or Correct ONLY, INSTEAD off from what you just ASSUME might be true, right, or correct ONLY?
In other words WHY NOT just make that 'something', some 'thing', which is ACTUALLY IRREFUTABLY True, Right, and/or Correct ONLY?
Something that can be created can also be destroyed
Re: Something that can be created can also be destroyed
Re: Something that can be created can also be destroyed
So, are you saying and claiming that creation causes destruction, and, destruction happens because of destruction, correct?
I MEAN, what are you saying and claiming that I HAVE PROVE there?
Re: Something that can be created can also be destroyed
Are you NOT ABLE TO just START an argument with the ACTUAL and IRREFUTABLE Truth?bahman wrote: ↑Sat Jul 02, 2022 1:10 pmIf you have such an argument feel free to open a new thread and present it there.Age wrote: ↑Sat Jul 02, 2022 1:12 amHow about starting ANY and ALL arguments from what IS IRREFUTABLY True, Right, and/or Correct ONLY, INSTEAD off from what you just ASSUME might be true, right, or correct ONLY?
In other words WHY NOT just make that 'something', some 'thing', which is ACTUALLY IRREFUTABLY True, Right, and/or Correct ONLY?
Also, I was NOT CLAIMING ANY thing here, which an 'argument' was needed for.
But this would be EASILY RECOGNIZABLE, that is; IF one was LOOKING CLEARLY and OPENLY here.
Re: Something that can be created can also be destroyed
Re: Something that can be created can also be destroyed
I cannot do that. Feel free to share one if you can in a separate thread.Age wrote: ↑Sat Jul 02, 2022 1:41 pmAre you NOT ABLE TO just START an argument with the ACTUAL and IRREFUTABLE Truth?bahman wrote: ↑Sat Jul 02, 2022 1:10 pmIf you have such an argument feel free to open a new thread and present it there.Age wrote: ↑Sat Jul 02, 2022 1:12 am
How about starting ANY and ALL arguments from what IS IRREFUTABLY True, Right, and/or Correct ONLY, INSTEAD off from what you just ASSUME might be true, right, or correct ONLY?
In other words WHY NOT just make that 'something', some 'thing', which is ACTUALLY IRREFUTABLY True, Right, and/or Correct ONLY?
Also, I was NOT CLAIMING ANY thing here, which an 'argument' was needed for.
But this would be EASILY RECOGNIZABLE, that is; IF one was LOOKING CLEARLY and OPENLY here.
Re: Something that can be created can also be destroyed
So, when you say:
B can happen because of A.
What does this mean if 'B' is destruction and 'A' is creation, and you are NOT saying 'A' causes 'B'?
If 'B' can happen BECAUSE OF 'A', then what does BECAUSE OF mean if NOT CAUSED?
LOL
It was YOU who SAID that it was ME who, supposedly, HAS TO PROVE some thing.
And, LOL, FURTHER, what do you think or BELIEVE you have ALREADY PROVED here?
Re: Something that can be created can also be destroyed
If you SAY and BELIEVE you are NOT ABLE TO do that, then okay.bahman wrote: ↑Sat Jul 02, 2022 2:14 pmI cannot do that.
Re: Something that can be created can also be destroyed
Yes, A does not cause B.
Read OP.
Re: Something that can be created can also be destroyed
But this is what I said before, to wit you replied, "No", and now you say, "Yes".bahman wrote: ↑Sun Jul 03, 2022 3:09 pmYes, A does not cause B.
ONCE AGAIN, you CONTRADICT what you have previously stated, and even CLARIFIED.
NOTHING 'proved' there.
In fact, I SHOWED what was Wrong and False there, to which you SAID, "No" to, but which you now SAY, "Yes" to.