She's a pathological liar (an automated narcissistic defence mechanism) in addition to being autistic and having a God syndrome and having a messiah syndrome. That's why I study her sometimes, I'm slightly curious how this combination works.uwot wrote: ↑Sun Jun 19, 2022 2:29 pmGood point Atla; nor is it dependent on anyone being 'TRULY OPEN'.Age isn't a liar; he should warrant our sympathy, because he is clearly not all there. But if this is simply a therapy for people with obvious psychological, emotional and social problems, are we all nuts?
Currant Buns and Pop Guns - The Big Bang
Re: Currant Buns and Pop Guns - The Big Bang
Re: Currant Buns and Pop Guns - The Big Bang
Re: Currant Buns and Pop Guns - The Big Bang
But absolutely NOTHING can be PROVEN to 'you', "uwot", correct?
Or, can there IN FACT be some things that CAN BE PROVEN?
LOOK "uwot" you come here CLAIMING that the Universe BEGAN, and IS EXPANDING.
I suggest that if you are NOT ABLE TO bakc up and support YOUR CLAIMS, BEFORE you even EXPRESS them, then do NOT EXPRESS your CLAIMS AT ALL.
Re: Currant Buns and Pop Guns - The Big Bang
Well, psychology isn't my field, so I won't argue with that
Re: Currant Buns and Pop Guns - The Big Bang
What a COINCIDENCE. EVERY one you "study" just HAPPENS TO HAVE what you USED TO HAVE.Atla wrote: ↑Sun Jun 19, 2022 2:33 pmShe's a pathological liar (an automated narcissistic defence mechanism) in addition to being autistic and having a God syndrome and having a messiah syndrome. That's why I study her sometimes, I'm slightly curious how this combination works.uwot wrote: ↑Sun Jun 19, 2022 2:29 pmGood point Atla; nor is it dependent on anyone being 'TRULY OPEN'.Age isn't a liar; he should warrant our sympathy, because he is clearly not all there. But if this is simply a therapy for people with obvious psychological, emotional and social problems, are we all nuts?
You, just like "veritas aequitas", ONLY SEE in "others" what you two ONCE BOTH had. And, for ANY one else to NOTICE this, then all they have to do is READ the ACTUAL WORDS that BOTH of you USE.
Re: Currant Buns and Pop Guns - The Big Bang
If I had them then I wouldn't need to study them.Age wrote: ↑Sun Jun 19, 2022 2:41 pmWhat a COINCIDENCE. EVERY one you "study" just HAPPENS TO HAVE what you USED TO HAVE.Atla wrote: ↑Sun Jun 19, 2022 2:33 pmShe's a pathological liar (an automated narcissistic defence mechanism) in addition to being autistic and having a God syndrome and having a messiah syndrome. That's why I study her sometimes, I'm slightly curious how this combination works.uwot wrote: ↑Sun Jun 19, 2022 2:29 pm Good point Atla; nor is it dependent on anyone being 'TRULY OPEN'.
Age isn't a liar; he should warrant our sympathy, because he is clearly not all there. But if this is simply a therapy for people with obvious psychological, emotional and social problems, are we all nuts?
You, just like "veritas aequitas", ONLY SEE in "others" what you two ONCE BOTH had. And, for ANY one else to NOTICE this, then all they have to do is READ the ACTUAL WORDS that BOTH of you USE.
Re: Currant Buns and Pop Guns - The Big Bang
What you write strongly suggests that you are too stupid to understand what I have made plain many times. I don't expect you to grasp it this time either, but hope springs eternal. Here it is again slowly: the mere existence of a sensation: a thought, a vision, a sound, a smell, a feeling, a taste, is proof that sensation exists. Do you understand that bit?
Re: Currant Buns and Pop Guns - The Big Bang
LOL Do you NOT UNDERSTAND just what a CLARIFY QUESTION IS, EXACTLY?uwot wrote: ↑Sun Jun 19, 2022 2:52 pmWhat you write strongly suggests that you are too stupid to understand what I have made plain many times. I don't expect you to grasp it this time either, but hope springs eternal. Here it is again slowly: the mere existence of a sensation: a thought, a vision, a sound, a smell, a feeling, a taste, is proof that sensation exists. Do you understand that bit?
LOOK AT the ACTUAL QUESTION I POSED, and put forward, to you.
Now, either you are ABLE TO just ANSWER that ACTUAL QUESTION, or you are NOT. So far, you are PROVING that you are NOT.
Here, I will re-write it AGAIN for you.
CAN ANY thing be PROVEN to 'you', "uwot"?
In case you are STILL UNAWARE this is a 'yes' or a 'no' CLARIFYING QUESTION. Just like the other one WAS and STILL IS.
Does this HELP 'you', "uwot"?
Re: Currant Buns and Pop Guns - The Big Bang
Also "uwot" are you AWARE that what you ask me about in regards to if I understood that bit?, could COUNTER or CONTRADICT your CLAIM that it was, "a good point" in relation to the, "Proof isn't proof if it only "works" some of the time..." CLAIM.
Oh, and by the way, is all of this just more attempts at DEFLECTING AWAY from the Fact that you have absolutely NOTHING AT ALL of absolutely ANY SUBSTANCE AT ALL in relation to your ASSUMPTION and CLAIM that the WHOLE Universe BEGAN, from absolutely NOTHING AT ALL, and IS EXPANDING and GROWING?
Oh, and by the way, is all of this just more attempts at DEFLECTING AWAY from the Fact that you have absolutely NOTHING AT ALL of absolutely ANY SUBSTANCE AT ALL in relation to your ASSUMPTION and CLAIM that the WHOLE Universe BEGAN, from absolutely NOTHING AT ALL, and IS EXPANDING and GROWING?
Re: Currant Buns and Pop Guns - The Big Bang
Well Age, as I said:
To anyone with an IQ in double digits, that would be a yes.uwot wrote: ↑Sun Jun 19, 2022 2:52 pmWhat you write strongly suggests that you are too stupid to understand what I have made plain many times. I don't expect you to grasp it this time either, but hope springs eternal. Here it is again slowly: the mere existence of a sensation: a thought, a vision, a sound, a smell, a feeling, a taste, is proof that sensation exists. Do you understand that bit?
I'm not the one who needs help.
Re: Currant Buns and Pop Guns - The Big Bang
ANY one with True and FULL INTELLIGENCE would have just SEEN the QUESTION for what it Truly WAS and Truly IS and would have just ANSWERED, 'Yes' or 'No' WITHOUT spending and wasting time writing ABSOLUTELY UNNECESSARY WORDS, in an ATTEMPT to 'try to' make the "other one" look STUPIDuwot wrote: ↑Sun Jun 19, 2022 3:21 pmWell Age, as I said:To anyone with an IQ in double digits, that would be a yes.uwot wrote: ↑Sun Jun 19, 2022 2:52 pmWhat you write strongly suggests that you are too stupid to understand what I have made plain many times. I don't expect you to grasp it this time either, but hope springs eternal. Here it is again slowly: the mere existence of a sensation: a thought, a vision, a sound, a smell, a feeling, a taste, is proof that sensation exists. Do you understand that bit?I'm not the one who needs help.
Wete you NOT AWARE that just writing 'Yes' or 'No' is FAR QUICKER, SIMPLER, and EASIER than writing what you DID?
Re: Currant Buns and Pop Guns - The Big Bang
If you don't understand this:Age wrote: ↑Sun Jun 19, 2022 9:34 pmANY one with True and FULL INTELLIGENCE would have just SEEN the QUESTION for what it Truly WAS and Truly IS and would have just ANSWERED, 'Yes' or 'No' WITHOUT spending and wasting time writing ABSOLUTELY UNNECESSARY WORDS, in an ATTEMPT to 'try to' make the "other one" look STUPID
you are stupid.
Re: Currant Buns and Pop Guns - The Big Bang
You wrote this AFTER what WAS being discussed. And, I UNDERSTOOD what you wrote here the very instant I saw it. That discussion, by the way, HAD ALREADY BEEN DEALT WITH.uwot wrote: ↑Mon Jun 20, 2022 4:50 amIf you don't understand this:Age wrote: ↑Sun Jun 19, 2022 9:34 pmANY one with True and FULL INTELLIGENCE would have just SEEN the QUESTION for what it Truly WAS and Truly IS and would have just ANSWERED, 'Yes' or 'No' WITHOUT spending and wasting time writing ABSOLUTELY UNNECESSARY WORDS, in an ATTEMPT to 'try to' make the "other one" look STUPIDyou are stupid.
I also UNDERSTAND that what you wrote here, CONTRADICTS what you have PREVIOUSLY written.
Were you AWARE of this? Do you UNDERSTAND this?
ALSO, you just seem to be 'trying to' DEFLECT MORE and MORE now.
You started this thread with views and/or BELIEFS that you have so far been completely UNABLE to substantiate. If you do NOT want to ADMIT and ACCEPT this, then so be it. But all of this OTHER STUFF is completely UNNECESSARY.
Re: Currant Buns and Pop Guns - The Big Bang
Good, so you won't be making any more silly claims to know THE TRUTH.
I've been pretty consistent. Here's me making the point you now understand 8 years ago:
uwot wrote: ↑Mon Mar 31, 2014 3:59 pmWell, Parmenides pointed out that there isn't nothing; more to the point, something definitely exists. Descartes upped the ante by proving that experience exists. It's not a lot, I grant you, but it isn't quite no truth whatsoever.skakos wrote:Philosophy tries to find the truth but the only thing is actually HAS found is that there is NO truth whatsoever!
This thread is not based on my views or beliefs, it is based on mainstream scientific hypotheses drawn from the observable data which I present here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nXW6TD2TpLU
Re: Currant Buns and Pop Guns - The Big Bang
ONLY IF you do NOT make ANY more silly CLAIMS, which you can NOT back up and support, okay?
By the way I CAN back up and support the CLAIMS I make with IRREFUTABLE PROOF.
LOL
LOL
LOL
You are joking here, right?
uwot wrote: ↑Mon Jun 20, 2022 8:49 am Here's me making the point you now understand 8 years ago:SO WHAT?uwot wrote: ↑Mon Mar 31, 2014 3:59 pmWell, Parmenides pointed out that there isn't nothing; more to the point, something definitely exists. Descartes upped the ante by proving that experience exists. It's not a lot, I grant you, but it isn't quite no truth whatsoever.skakos wrote:Philosophy tries to find the truth but the only thing is actually HAS found is that there is NO truth whatsoever!
A LOT of 'you', human beings, have said a LOT of things.
YES WE KNOW. BUT, those views and/or BELIEFS have so far been completely UNABLE to be substantiated.uwot wrote: ↑Mon Jun 20, 2022 8:49 amThis thread is not based on my views or beliefs, it is based on mainstream scientific hypotheses drawn from the observable data which I present here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nXW6TD2TpLU
And, this is BECAUSE those views and BELIEFS can NOT backed up NOR supported.
This is BECAUSE the Universe did NOT BEGIN and could NOT EXPAND, like SOME of 'you' think and BELIEVE.
As I keep TELLING you, but which you appear to be completely UNABLE to HEAR, COMPREHEND, and UNDERSTAND, those hypotheses, theories, assumptions, and guesses are being made from Wrong INTERPRETATIONS of the ACTUAL observable 'data'.
As I am ABLE TO PROVE IRREFUTABLY True, Right, AND Correct, and as so-called "mainstream scientific hypotheses" HAVE BEEN and CONTINUALLY ARE being PROVED False, Wrong, OR Incorrect CONTINUALLY.
This "beginning and expanding Universe" is just ANOTHER which ALREADY HAS been PROVED False, Wrong, AND Incorrect. Some of 'you', in the days when this was being written, were just NOT YET ABLE to SEE and RECOGNIZE this Fact,
This is because of the way those ones were LOOKING AT and SEEING 'things' here.