Please refer to my previous posts as these issues have already been taken care of.Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Thu May 05, 2022 12:25 amIt is both hypocritical and not-hypocritical as it, that is your absence of silence, is relative to context. This "both" should comes as no surprise to you as my previous boths takes a "both/and" approach when observing what seems to be an opposition.Sculptor wrote: ↑Fri Apr 29, 2022 12:33 pmYou are confused.Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 28, 2022 10:59 pm
Your absence of silence is hypocritical....that and the statement "Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent" is a self-contradiction, which is fine with me because my premises are in contradictions but not for you.
This leads to a question for you:
"What is not a contradiction?"
One minute my silence is hypocritical then my absence of silence is hypocritical - make up your mind!
I always speak whereof I may. It's just that you have lost contact with reality as your posts clearly show.
And again:
"What is not a contradiction?"
Numbers as Forms Independent of Human Awareness
Re: Numbers as Forms Independent of Human Awareness
Re: Numbers as Forms Independent of Human Awareness
You are ignoring my question...."What is not a contradiction?"Sculptor wrote: ↑Thu May 05, 2022 8:40 amPlease refer to my previous posts as these issues have already been taken care of.Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Thu May 05, 2022 12:25 amIt is both hypocritical and not-hypocritical as it, that is your absence of silence, is relative to context. This "both" should comes as no surprise to you as my previous boths takes a "both/and" approach when observing what seems to be an opposition.
And again:
"What is not a contradiction?"
Re: Numbers as Forms Independent of Human Awareness
A contradiction is what you are and not a contradiction is what I say.Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Thu May 05, 2022 10:38 pmYou are ignoring my question...."What is not a contradiction?"Sculptor wrote: ↑Thu May 05, 2022 8:40 amPlease refer to my previous posts as these issues have already been taken care of.Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Thu May 05, 2022 12:25 am
It is both hypocritical and not-hypocritical as it, that is your absence of silence, is relative to context. This "both" should comes as no surprise to you as my previous boths takes a "both/and" approach when observing what seems to be an opposition.
And again:
"What is not a contradiction?"
Re: Numbers as Forms Independent of Human Awareness
Re: Numbers as Forms Independent of Human Awareness
Re: Numbers as Forms Independent of Human Awareness
And I will ask again: What is this "thing" relational truths point to?
You really need to learn to read at your age or get some glasses:
I will say again in different words, which can be view synonymously to the previous statements:
1. Relational truths point to nothing.
2. As pointing to nothing relational truths are pointing to an absence of thingness.
3. In pointing to an absence of thingness relational truths reveal reality as indefinite because of the aforementioned pointing.
4. As pointing to nothing, ie an absence of thingness, the relational truths point to everything as everything is the same as nothing considering "everything" has no comparison to allow forms.
5. Relational truths in meaning nothing mean everything.
****Everything is the same as nothing as the totality of being is without comparison thus is indefinite.
Re: Numbers as Forms Independent of Human Awareness
Re: Numbers as Forms Independent of Human Awareness
You just talked to me...it would be relatively pointless for you not to answer the question.
I never said "meaningless" if nothing equates to everything. Again:
I will say again in different words, which can be view synonymously to the previous statements:
1. Relational truths point to nothing.
2. As pointing to nothing relational truths are pointing to an absence of thingness.
3. In pointing to an absence of thingness relational truths reveal reality as indefinite because of the aforementioned pointing.
4. As pointing to nothing, ie an absence of thingness, the relational truths point to everything as everything is the same as nothing considering "everything" has no comparison to allow forms.
5. Relational truths in meaning nothing mean everything.
Re: Numbers as Forms Independent of Human Awareness
Please refer to the comments I made above.Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Wed May 18, 2022 11:23 pmYou just talked to me...it would be relatively pointless for you not to answer the question.
I never said "meaningless" if nothing equates to everything. Again:
I will say again in different words, which can be view synonymously to the previous statements:
1. Relational truths point to nothing.
2. As pointing to nothing relational truths are pointing to an absence of thingness.
3. In pointing to an absence of thingness relational truths reveal reality as indefinite because of the aforementioned pointing.
4. As pointing to nothing, ie an absence of thingness, the relational truths point to everything as everything is the same as nothing considering "everything" has no comparison to allow forms.
5. Relational truths in meaning nothing mean everything.
Re: Numbers as Forms Independent of Human Awareness
Your ability to only repeat what you have said proves how exhausted your mental abilities are.Sculptor wrote: ↑Thu May 19, 2022 8:44 amPlease refer to the comments I made above.Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Wed May 18, 2022 11:23 pmYou just talked to me...it would be relatively pointless for you not to answer the question.
I never said "meaningless" if nothing equates to everything. Again:
I will say again in different words, which can be view synonymously to the previous statements:
1. Relational truths point to nothing.
2. As pointing to nothing relational truths are pointing to an absence of thingness.
3. In pointing to an absence of thingness relational truths reveal reality as indefinite because of the aforementioned pointing.
4. As pointing to nothing, ie an absence of thingness, the relational truths point to everything as everything is the same as nothing considering "everything" has no comparison to allow forms.
5. Relational truths in meaning nothing mean everything.
If "relational truths in meaning nothing mean everything" then there is a point in you answering my question:
What is this "thing" relational truths point to?
Re: Numbers as Forms Independent of Human Awareness
Please refer to the comments I made above.Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Thu May 19, 2022 11:59 pmYour ability to only repeat what you have said proves how exhausted your mental abilities are.Sculptor wrote: ↑Thu May 19, 2022 8:44 amPlease refer to the comments I made above.Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Wed May 18, 2022 11:23 pm
You just talked to me...it would be relatively pointless for you not to answer the question.
I never said "meaningless" if nothing equates to everything. Again:
I will say again in different words, which can be view synonymously to the previous statements:
1. Relational truths point to nothing.
2. As pointing to nothing relational truths are pointing to an absence of thingness.
3. In pointing to an absence of thingness relational truths reveal reality as indefinite because of the aforementioned pointing.
4. As pointing to nothing, ie an absence of thingness, the relational truths point to everything as everything is the same as nothing considering "everything" has no comparison to allow forms.
5. Relational truths in meaning nothing mean everything.
If "relational truths in meaning nothing mean everything" then there is a point in you answering my question:
What is this "thing" relational truths point to?
Re: Numbers as Forms Independent of Human Awareness
They do not answer the question as to what this "thing" is.Sculptor wrote: ↑Fri May 20, 2022 11:45 amPlease refer to the comments I made above.