No, you are attempting to use quantifiers implicitly from,K1Barin wrote: ↑Thu Oct 07, 2021 6:48 pm I don't know about multivalued logic. I am thinking pure 1 and 0. Even saying it is true or not true. Not even saying true or false. Saying something is false has a sense of condemnation, and two values of true or false are like 1 and -1, not 1 and 0. I am thinking pure 1 and 0 logic, as everyone knows how digital equipment have taken over all the industry.
That way being contrary or in contradiction, are the same.
...which implicitly is identical to...1- It is all Determinism.
2- It is all Choice.
3- It is some Choice and some Determinism.
You haven't proven any two of these as false to rule out what remains. This is not an argument but the same as saying only one of these is exclusively true. As such, no conclusion can be drawn on mere logic. You need to prove 1 and 2 false for 3 to be true.1- "All Reality is Deterministic"
2- "No Reality is Deterministic" or...
3- "Some Reality is Deterministic" and "Some Reality is not Deterministic"
Even if you accepted 3, you'd have to point to some reality as deterministic AND some reality that is not. I know that we agree to the possibility of 3 but you'd have to show HOW both are possible. I offer the many worlds interpretation which accounts for a local reality as appearing 'freely chosen' but that is nevertheless still deterministic in parallel universes. But one can still be coming to this conclusion if one asserts God gives humans a special 'freedom' but that the rest of nature is strictly deterministic.