How then reality is if it is not cause and effect. It applies to any process.RCSaunders wrote: ↑Sat Jun 05, 2021 6:22 pmDon't worry about it.There is no such thing as cause and effect. Its the simpleminded fiction invention of Hume and the way "cause," is understood by school children.
Everything would be simultaneous...
Re: Everything would be simultaneous...
Re: Everything would be simultaneous...
WHAT 'interval'?
WHAT is that, supposed, 'interval', an interval of EXACTLY?
Re: Everything would be simultaneous...
Re: Everything would be simultaneous...
So, to you, the 'interval', of which you are speaking of, is the interval of a temporal interval, correct?
If this is not correct, then what is?
But, if that was correct, then the more you 'try to' clarify the more you appear confused.
Also, if there is ANY thing other than a 'temporal' interval, then what is that interval?
And, what do you mean by 'temporal' here?
Re: Everything would be simultaneous...
For the meaning of interval and temporal please check a dictionary.Age wrote: ↑Sun Jun 06, 2021 9:12 amSo, to you, the 'interval', of which you are speaking of, is the interval of a temporal interval, correct?
If this is not correct, then what is?
But, if that was correct, then the more you 'try to' clarify the more you appear confused.
Also, if there is ANY thing other than a 'temporal' interval, then what is that interval?
And, what do you mean by 'temporal' here?
Re: Everything would be simultaneous...
ANOTHER PRIME EXAMPLE of just how the human beings, in the days when this was written, made MANY CLAIMS but, very sadly for them, were COMPLETELY and UTTERLY INCAPABLE of backing up and supporting THEIR CLAIMS.bahman wrote: ↑Sun Jun 06, 2021 10:02 amFor the meaning of interval and temporal please check a dictionary.Age wrote: ↑Sun Jun 06, 2021 9:12 amSo, to you, the 'interval', of which you are speaking of, is the interval of a temporal interval, correct?
If this is not correct, then what is?
But, if that was correct, then the more you 'try to' clarify the more you appear confused.
Also, if there is ANY thing other than a 'temporal' interval, then what is that interval?
And, what do you mean by 'temporal' here?
WHENEVER they, FINALLY, REALIZE that their CLAIMS were False, Wrong, and/or Incorrect, then will 'try to' DETRACT or DEFER somehow.
Once they actually STOP, and start THINKING ABOUT what they ACTUALLY WROTE, then they REALIZE just how ILLOGICAL and ABSURD their CLAIMS ARE. As PROVEN, ONCE MORE.
Oh, and by the way, I checked within a dictionary. That is how I ACTUALLY KNEW what 'you' were CLAIMING was SO ILLOGICAL and ABSURD.
- RCSaunders
- Posts: 4704
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2018 9:42 pm
- Contact:
Re: Everything would be simultaneous...
No. It's not, "cause," that is the mistake, it's the view that, "the same cause produces the same effect," that is mistaken. Cause is not, "this kind of event causes this kind of event." In fact no true scientific principle can be explained in those terms. Cause is whatever the, "explanation," or, "reason," any event takes place and is almost always determined by many variables, never any single, "cause."bahman wrote: ↑Sun Jun 06, 2021 2:17 amHow then reality is if it is not cause and effect. It applies to any process.RCSaunders wrote: ↑Sat Jun 05, 2021 6:22 pmDon't worry about it.There is no such thing as cause and effect. Its the simpleminded fiction invention of Hume and the way "cause," is understood by school children.
Scientific principles are never of the form, Cause A always results in effect B. Scientific principles are of the form, these entities have properties A, B, and C, and entities with those properties will behave in manner D in context E. Even the simplest of physical properties are descriptions of relationships, like E=IR, the voltage in a DC circuit equals the current times the resistance. What causes all events is the nature of the entities acting in relation to other entities. In the entire history of the universe there have never been two identical events with identical causes.
Re: Everything would be simultaneous...
We also have a deterministic system of causes and effects. I am not talking about determinism though.RCSaunders wrote: ↑Sun Jun 06, 2021 4:17 pmNo. It's not, "cause," that is the mistake, it's the view that, "the same cause produces the same effect," that is mistaken. Cause is not, "this kind of event causes this kind of event." In fact no true scientific principle can be explained in those terms. Cause is whatever the, "explanation," or, "reason," any event takes place and is almost always determined by many variables, never any single, "cause."bahman wrote: ↑Sun Jun 06, 2021 2:17 amHow then reality is if it is not cause and effect. It applies to any process.RCSaunders wrote: ↑Sat Jun 05, 2021 6:22 pm
Don't worry about it.There is no such thing as cause and effect. Its the simpleminded fiction invention of Hume and the way "cause," is understood by school children.
Scientific principles are never of the form, Cause A always results in effect B. Scientific principles are of the form, these entities have properties A, B, and C, and entities with those properties will behave in manner D in context E. Even the simplest of physical properties are descriptions of relationships, like E=IR, the voltage in a DC circuit equals the current times the resistance. What causes all events is the nature of the entities acting in relation to other entities. In the entire history of the universe there have never been two identical events with identical causes.
- RCSaunders
- Posts: 4704
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2018 9:42 pm
- Contact:
Re: Everything would be simultaneous...
Who's we?bahman wrote: ↑Mon Jun 07, 2021 2:18 amWe also have a deterministic system of causes and effects. I am not talking about determinism though.RCSaunders wrote: ↑Sun Jun 06, 2021 4:17 pmNo. It's not, "cause," that is the mistake, it's the view that, "the same cause produces the same effect," that is mistaken. Cause is not, "this kind of event causes this kind of event." In fact no true scientific principle can be explained in those terms. Cause is whatever the, "explanation," or, "reason," any event takes place and is almost always determined by many variables, never any single, "cause."
Scientific principles are never of the form, Cause A always results in effect B. Scientific principles are of the form, these entities have properties A, B, and C, and entities with those properties will behave in manner D in context E. Even the simplest of physical properties are descriptions of relationships, like E=IR, the voltage in a DC circuit equals the current times the resistance. What causes all events is the nature of the entities acting in relation to other entities. In the entire history of the universe there have never been two identical events with identical causes.
Re: Everything would be simultaneous...
People who studied many particles systems.RCSaunders wrote: ↑Mon Jun 07, 2021 4:49 pmWho's we?bahman wrote: ↑Mon Jun 07, 2021 2:18 amWe also have a deterministic system of causes and effects. I am not talking about determinism though.RCSaunders wrote: ↑Sun Jun 06, 2021 4:17 pm
No. It's not, "cause," that is the mistake, it's the view that, "the same cause produces the same effect," that is mistaken. Cause is not, "this kind of event causes this kind of event." In fact no true scientific principle can be explained in those terms. Cause is whatever the, "explanation," or, "reason," any event takes place and is almost always determined by many variables, never any single, "cause."
Scientific principles are never of the form, Cause A always results in effect B. Scientific principles are of the form, these entities have properties A, B, and C, and entities with those properties will behave in manner D in context E. Even the simplest of physical properties are descriptions of relationships, like E=IR, the voltage in a DC circuit equals the current times the resistance. What causes all events is the nature of the entities acting in relation to other entities. In the entire history of the universe there have never been two identical events with identical causes.
- RCSaunders
- Posts: 4704
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2018 9:42 pm
- Contact:
Re: Everything would be simultaneous...
They obviously wasted their time.
Re: Everything would be simultaneous...
I don't think so.RCSaunders wrote: ↑Tue Jun 08, 2021 12:08 pmThey obviously wasted their time.
-
- Posts: 5181
- Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2017 6:38 pm
Re: Everything would be simultaneous...
The wave function is everything at once.
The biological body is Self existing at the same place (your body) at different times and mind is Self existing at different places at the same time.
From one perspective it appears as though physical phenomena are causing the movements of other physical particles and from another perspective it is the wave function that is causing the actions of physical subatomic particles.
It's like a 2D screen. There cause-effect relationship that appears to be happening between the "objects" on the screen is actually an illusion. The cause of the apparent separate objects interacting with one another is the information wave hitting the back of the screen, not from the on and off flashing pixels.
The Self/Absolute/Awareness is the frame of reference; the reality; that which does not change.
Re: Everything would be simultaneous...
If by "now" you mean timeless presence, I concur.
If by "now" you are referring to your immediate physical surroundings i do not.
Everything experienced as the physical 3D realm is actually the past. Thoughts are the future self and Absolute, Divine Self is outside of time and Absolute.