Read before you post.
Don't jump to conclusions.
Honor the truce.
I did, and I do.
I didn't. I gave it some thought, and it truly looked like you were giving a thumbs-up to some kind of rude and undeserved comment that Atto made in response to a heartfelt post I made. I apologized in case that's not what it was about, although it seems that it was.
Like you do when you accused me of being full of myself, which was far from the truth. And when you characterize me as some ditzy hippy, which is also far from the truth.
Needs more analysis. No religion is a 'religion of love'. Islam, Judaism, and Christianity are , same as all religions, about enshrining social laws within sacred myths.Sculptor wrote: ↑Tue May 18, 2021 8:37 am There is a chilling clip, circulating on the Internet, of a thousand+ Jews jumping up and down in joy at the sight of a mosque in flames.
https://twitter.com/joshualeifer/status ... dia-667844
As we all know Judaism is a religion of love, as is Islam, and Christianity.
"""RELIGION""""Belinda wrote: ↑Tue May 18, 2021 10:06 amNeeds more analysis. No religion is a 'religion of love'. Islam, Judaism, and Christianity are , same as all religions, about enshrining social laws within sacred myths.Sculptor wrote: ↑Tue May 18, 2021 8:37 am There is a chilling clip, circulating on the Internet, of a thousand+ Jews jumping up and down in joy at the sight of a mosque in flames.
https://twitter.com/joshualeifer/status ... dia-667844
As we all know Judaism is a religion of love, as is Islam, and Christianity.
Many would claim that this is true of "organised" religion, true.Belinda wrote: ↑Tue May 18, 2021 10:06 amNeeds more analysis. No religion is a 'religion of love'.Sculptor wrote: ↑Tue May 18, 2021 8:37 am There is a chilling clip, circulating on the Internet, of a thousand+ Jews jumping up and down in joy at the sight of a mosque in flames.
https://twitter.com/joshualeifer/status ... dia-667844
As we all know Judaism is a religion of love, as is Islam, and Christianity.Islam, Judaism, and Christianity are , same as all religions, about enshrining social laws within sacred myths.I am merely repeating their claims.
Zionism is not compatible the left wing internationalism.
Islam, Judaism, and Christianity and their common ethic of The Golden Rule may be applied either tribally or universally. Judaism is applied tribally by Right wing Israeli extremists and other Right wing extremists.(Some earlier Israeli prime ministers have been Left wing.)
But by discounting their religion you are automatically denying the prime raison d'etre; the myths of the "promised land", and the "chosen people", both of which are essentially right wing
Instead of blaming religions we need to find out why Israel has adopted a policy of genocide against Palestinians.
Yes.
Faces also vary, but the question isn't about variance.Lacewing wrote: ↑Sat May 08, 2021 11:25 am You guys, Walker and Atto, are submitting nonsensical questions and claims that apparently only make sense in your own heads. Whatever mental channel you're on appears to be too full of noise to discern anything other than that, and that's why it seems pointless to talk with you about much of anything.
How is that a point? It varies.
Atto wrote: Don't bother getting a room. Just inter_face. in response to and in observation of the friendly back & forth between seeds and yourself. I found it funny cuz friendliness is even more rare than civility here, and this is a virtual forum, so inter-face is a double entendre.Lacewing wrote: ↑Wed May 19, 2021 5:16 amYes.
Can you explain what it was about... that you thought was funny? Maybe I don't understand the joke.
Considering Atto's tendency toward sexual insults, I guessed that his comment was directly in response to me saying this at the end of my post: This has been the most enjoyable discussion I've had in awhile! And I break the rules all the time... in regard to thread topics and all sorts of other things. That's where the juicy good stuff is.henry quirk wrote: ↑Wed May 19, 2021 2:37 pmAtto wrote: Don't bother getting a room. Just inter_face. in response to and in observation of the friendly back & forth between seeds and yourself. I found it funny cuz friendliness is even more rare than civility here, and this is a virtual forum, so inter-face is a double entendre.
Do you get it? Probably not.
*Yeah, I think you misunderstood his comment and know you've misunderstood my .Lacewing wrote: ↑Wed May 19, 2021 3:00 pmConsidering Atto's tendency toward sexual insults, I guessed that his comment was directly in response to me saying this at the end of my post: This has been the most enjoyable discussion I've had in awhile! And I break the rules all the time... in regard to thread topics and all sorts of other things. That's where the juicy good stuff is.henry quirk wrote: ↑Wed May 19, 2021 2:37 pmAtto wrote: Don't bother getting a room. Just inter_face. in response to and in observation of the friendly back & forth between seeds and yourself. I found it funny cuz friendliness is even more rare than civility here, and this is a virtual forum, so inter-face is a double entendre.
Do you get it? Probably not.
Atto's comment appeared to be more than just an observation of "the friendly back & forth" between seeds and I, as you casually put it. It appeared to suggest a sexual act... which you produced your thumb for.
*Did I misunderstand?
Atto, can you clarify what your comment (identified below) meant?
Lacewing wrote: ↑Wed May 19, 2021 3:00 pmConsidering Atto's tendency toward sexual insults, I guessed that his comment was directly in response to me saying this at the end of my post: This has been the most enjoyable discussion I've had in awhile! And I break the rules all the time... in regard to thread topics and all sorts of other things. That's where the juicy good stuff is.henry quirk wrote: ↑Wed May 19, 2021 2:37 pm Atto wrote: Don't bother getting a room. Just inter_face. in response to and in observation of the friendly back & forth between seeds and yourself. I found it funny cuz friendliness is even more rare than civility here, and this is a virtual forum, so inter-face is a double entendre.
Do you get it? Probably not.
Atto's comment appeared to be more than just an observation of "the friendly back & forth" between seeds and I, as you casually put it. It appeared to suggest a sexual act... which you produced your thumb for.
Did I misunderstand?
You have to walk through the door yourself.