Would you trust “messages” from a dishonest speaker?
Observed happenings are always what they are in the instant they are happening, and cannot be any other way. A happening can never not be happening. A happening cannot unhappen. No one can SAY what is happening is true or false, except as knowledge within the dream of separation.Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Wed Apr 21, 2021 7:28 pmWell, in the first place, you don't know who's "dishonest" and who's not, of course. But more importantly, even if you were right, you don't know IF he/she is being dishonest at that minute or not. The message stands or falls on its own truthfulness.
If somebody tells you that your house is on fire, and you imagine that they are often "dishonest," you'd still be wise to check for fire. It's the message, not the speaker, that makes the difference.
No one can SAY because the seer of happenings can never be seen. There's simply what's happening.
Knowledge of said happenings claimed to be of the seer, can only be known within the artificial dream of separation, as a story told by no one.
So it doesn't matter what happens, no thing is happening.
It really doesn't matter what happens IC, because whatever happens could never have been avoided. Knowledge of any event is always on demand. Knowledge is not present in actual realtime presence.
.