How can Peter's views dominate when the bottom line is,FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Fri Apr 16, 2021 9:15 amThat's a claim which requires agreement with the FSK that asserts it. You don't intend to give anyone any reason to do that. Therefore your argument is empty.Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Fri Apr 16, 2021 5:19 amWhy do you insist by yourself that you are a dogmatic bastard.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Thu Apr 15, 2021 9:23 am
Then why do you keep trying to claim facts on the basis of it, and why do you keep calling everyone who doesn't agree with it a dogmatic bastard?
You haven't persuaded a single person in the whole world that your FSK counts for anything at all. You have zero credibility.
I was referring to you and Peter and the likes being influenced [brainwashed] by the bastardized philosophies of the logical positivists and their arrogance in being dogmatic with their beliefs triggering them to condemn those who do not agree with them in the most derogatory ways.
Note again, I have not presented the full model of my moral FSK here. I don't have any intention to persuade anyone here to consider and accept my full moral FSK/model.
My main contention re morality is that there are moral reality [physical and mental] and truths within morality-proper[as defined] which is to counter Peter's OP,
What could make morality objective?
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=24601
You lose, Pete wins. Can we end the spam now?
56% of philosophers [not the public] in a poll agree with moral realism.
Note the poll involves philosophers not any Tom, Dick or Harry.
So at least Peter, et al. will have to refute the above poll is totally baseless.
Those who refute moral realism has no credibility since they are brainwashed by the bastardized philosophies of the logical positivists and classical analytical philosophers which were trashed by Sellars, Quine, Wittgenstein and others.
Who is spamming?
Its Peter who would unilaterally post his views [ignoring what had been offered] to troll and trigger others to respond to his challenge.
I don't mind participating [my own discretion] since it is to my personal selfish interests to give me a chance to keep my views afresh and expanding into other areas.