The knowledge that there is 'A limited temporal expression of knowledge' would imply 'An Absolute all there is already available now'Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Wed Mar 03, 2021 1:50 pmThat might mean there IS none, it's true.
But more likely, it means that you're just a human being, which means "a temporal creature of limited knowledge and experience." So there are no doubt a great many things that are outside your personal experience and mine, which nevertheless, continue to exist in spite of us.
And so a limited expression can be no other than a relative absolute.
To imply the possibilty of a limited temporal expression also implies that an unlimited infinite store-house (source of knowledge ) must already exist, and be always available on demand appearing as a temporal knowledge.
This implies that everything that can be known conceptually is none other than the relative absolute.
Do you see what I mean IC ?
If the temporal limited exists, then so does the absolute infinite exist simultaneously.
Any known knowledge has to be the infinite unlimited pointing always to itself as being a relative absolute. The apparent disconnect between the relative and the absolute must be an illusion. There can only be the infinite appearing as itself and to itself.