I do get it. Some points of view are intolerable, and I hope I'd risk life and limb to fight for the right as I see it.There is such a thing as a just war.henry quirk wrote: ↑Fri Sep 25, 2020 5:26 pmcommon wrote about people gettin' along, I explained why that's not possible (cuz fundamentally, the struggle is between two opposin' view points with no common ground)
get it?
'20/'21: not safe for anyone
Re: 2020: not safe for anyone
- henry quirk
- Posts: 9926
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
Re: 2020: not safe for anyone
too bad we -- you & me-- would be on opposite sidesBelinda wrote: ↑Fri Sep 25, 2020 5:39 pmI do get it. Some points of view are intolerable, and I hope I'd risk life and limb to fight for the right as I see it.There is such a thing as a just war.henry quirk wrote: ↑Fri Sep 25, 2020 5:26 pmcommon wrote about people gettin' along, I explained why that's not possible (cuz fundamentally, the struggle is between two opposin' view points with no common ground)
get it?
- henry quirk
- Posts: 9926
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
-
- Posts: 3093
- Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2017 6:38 pm
Re: 2020: not safe for anyone
Thanks. That would mean that you’re cool and awake. I wasn’t far off after all!henry quirk wrote: ↑Fri Sep 25, 2020 5:00 pmI'm calm but aware
Re: 2020: not safe for anyone
Not safe hasn't even started yet.
Re: 2020: not safe for anyone
Your comment adds weight to the opinion expressed by Commonsense. The best thing to actually do is for all sides in a dispute to gather the most reliable info and the finest judges , and discuss terms with each other before violence.When violence is unavoidable there is international law, and accepted rules of war regarding treatment of prisoners and civilians.henry quirk wrote: ↑Fri Sep 25, 2020 6:39 pmtoo bad we -- you & me-- would be on opposite sidesBelinda wrote: ↑Fri Sep 25, 2020 5:39 pmI do get it. Some points of view are intolerable, and I hope I'd risk life and limb to fight for the right as I see it.There is such a thing as a just war.henry quirk wrote: ↑Fri Sep 25, 2020 5:26 pm
common wrote about people gettin' along, I explained why that's not possible (cuz fundamentally, the struggle is between two opposin' view points with no common ground)
get it?
- henry quirk
- Posts: 9926
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
Re: 2020: not safe for anyone
international law & courts is sorta like small claims court: you can get a judgement against the other guy from the court, but enforcin' is on youBelinda wrote: ↑Sat Sep 26, 2020 8:31 amYour comment adds weight to the opinion expressed by Commonsense. The best thing to actually do is for all sides in a dispute to gather the most reliable info and the finest judges , and discuss terms with each other before violence.When violence is unavoidable there is international law, and accepted rules of war regarding treatment of prisoners and civilians.
anyway: I'm not talkin' about a disputed tract of land or some unjust embargo...what's on the table today, it seems to me, is the very direct & plain war between freedom and slavery...there are folks who see themselves as the directors of all men and they aren't dissuaded by reason, and there are folks who are free, who intend to stay free, and they won't be moved by threats
what's the common ground between them?
what meaningful accommodations can either side make?
as dubious sez Not safe hasn't even started yet.
there's an inertia in place now: what's comin' is comin'
-
- Posts: 3093
- Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2017 6:38 pm
Re: 2020: not safe for anyone
HQ, why are you preaching from the anti-Trump handbook? I thought you were FOR Trump the Schlump.
- henry quirk
- Posts: 9926
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
Re: 2020: not safe for anyone
I don't think I've said anything anti-ORANGE MAN, but if I have: mehcommonsense wrote: ↑Sat Sep 26, 2020 11:35 pm HQ, why are you preaching from the anti-Trump handbook? I thought you were FOR Trump the Schlump.
ORANGE MAN is my instrument, not my leader