Again, OMG. This is a clear discussion of "is-ought". Yes, the victor "often" (not always) write history in practice. However, they should NOT write history if it is contrary to history.commonsense wrote: ↑Thu Sep 17, 2020 12:45 amAre you suggesting that because I have the belief that a war’s victor decides how history will view the war and its causes and how each side’s methods will be judged, I have no empathy?KLewchuk wrote: ↑Thu Sep 17, 2020 12:43 amOMG, this gets so tiresome.
Would you sell your wife or child for a TV? If so, you are unhealthy and don't know what brings well being. Would you sell your TV for someone else's life? Well, you have no empathy. Does empathy ultimately, in balance, contribute to well being more than a TV? Yes. So, you have no idea of what brings well being.
Is this really that complicated?
Not that complicated.