Paradigmer wrote: ↑Thu Sep 10, 2020 5:38 pm
Age wrote: ↑Thu Sep 10, 2020 6:45 am
But the Honest answer is a 'Yes' or a 'No'.
The scientific community as it IS was more on the pragmatic theory of truth, so to speak there isn't any real 'Honest' answer of a 'Yes' or a 'No' for the 'why' of the premise that focuses on making politically correct propositions for its pragmatical measurements.
I asked you the question, in regards to one of your comments. I ask you:
Have you thought about, or do you know WHY, some are being 'deliberately kept' there?
To me a 'Yes' or a 'No', for either or both, would suffice.
Paradigmer wrote: ↑Thu Sep 10, 2020 5:38 pm
Age wrote: ↑Thu Sep 10, 2020 1:36 pm
Which, in turn, helps in showing and reveal just HOW a Truly 'peaceful world', for EVERY one, can and will be created.
Really?
Yes.
Paradigmer wrote: ↑Thu Sep 10, 2020 5:38 pm
You meant all living things when you said "EVERY one"?
Are you asking or telling. Your sentence is a statement BUT with a question mark at the end.
If it is a statement, then okay. But, if it is a question, then Yes.
Paradigmer wrote: ↑Thu Sep 10, 2020 5:38 pm
Or were you just referring to the human species only, or just by switching the mindsets of the individuals like what the ostriches are doing?
No, to the first part of this question. I do NOT have clue what the second part of the question is in relation to.
Paradigmer wrote: ↑Thu Sep 10, 2020 5:38 pm
Or you were suggesting Truly 'peaceful world' could solely be accomplished by the human species alone and nevermind all other living things?
Human beings are the only ones, which they are yet aware of, who can fathom and discuss issues regarding 'peace'. So, only human beings, 'alone', can accomplish a Truly 'peaceful world', on earth. But, this OBVIOUSLY would include ALL other living things.
Paradigmer wrote: ↑Thu Sep 10, 2020 5:38 pm
See the arrogance of your belief?
But I do NOT have a belief.
So, there could NOT be any arrogance of some, alleged, belief, either.
Therefore, I could NOT see the, alleged, arrogance of what I do NOT even have.
Would you like to explain further what you were talking about here?
Paradigmer wrote: ↑Thu Sep 10, 2020 5:38 pm
Age wrote: ↑Thu Sep 10, 2020 6:45 am
But I was being, so called, "screwed" ALL of my life, that is; UNTIL I worked out and could SEE and UNDERSTAND what is actually going on here. Only THEN I could SEE that I am NOT being "screwed" here at all. So, this is how I see things NOW. BEFORE I was like ALL the "others" who view themselves as being "screwed over" by Life, Itself.
LOOKING AT and SEEING things for how they actually ARE, relieves absolutely ANY and ALL misgivings about being "screwed" here.
But because I UNDERSTAND, FULLY, WHAT is going to come about, and WHY ALL-OF-THIS, you talk about here, is necessary for
what IS to-come, there is, to me, NO 'suffering' at all and NO sense at all of 'being screwed' either.
You now have understood the value of being 'screwed', and therefore 'SEE' that you are not being 'screwed', is another matter on your idea of "others" who view themselves as being "screwed over" by Life.
These do not change the fact that we are all being screwed in this 'physical' world regardless of how you or others view it.
To make such a claim here, as you just have, then you would have to KNOW, and thus also be ABLE TO EXPLAIN, EXACTLY, who and/or what the 'we' is here, which 'you' are claiming are ALL being "screwed" in this 'physical' world.
For 'you' to make a claim regarding 'Me', which directly OPPOSES what 'I' ACTUALLY said, SEE, and UNDERSTAND, is a HUGE claim to make. Now, I suggest that you better have some VERY GOOD PROOF and EXPLAINING to od, which backs up and supports YOUR CLAIM HERE. So, what PROOF do 'you' have of who AND what 'I' am, AND, how do 'you explain that 'I' am SUPPOSEDLY being "screwed" in this 'physical' world.
Until you can provide thee accurate, proper, AND correct ANSWER to the question 'Who am 'I'?' then I suggest you forget about YOUR CLAIM here. Unless of course you would like to start EXPLAINING and start SHOWING the PROOF, which you have. And, if you do, then please go right ahead, and START.
Paradigmer wrote: ↑Thu Sep 10, 2020 5:38 pm
And you are assuming everyone is viewing 'being screwed' is absolutely a bad thing.
And what did you base this ASSUMPTION on, EXACTLY?
Paradigmer wrote: ↑Thu Sep 10, 2020 5:38 pm
Much could be said on this but I cut it short here.
Please do NOT cut it short. When you talk about ALL of 'we' 'being screwed' what do you ACTUALLY MEAN?
Paradigmer wrote: ↑Thu Sep 10, 2020 5:38 pm
Age wrote: ↑Thu Sep 10, 2020 6:45 am
But this is ALL part of the BEAUTY of what is being Created, and what is about to come.
The MORE 'one' has been 'trodden on', 'looked down upon', and been 'put down', then the MORE BEAUTIFUL it is for that 'one' RISE UP and SHOW and REVEAL what thee actual True Nature of Life, living, and loving, Itself, REALLY IS.
Indeed it is.
So you should be able to understand there actually is not anything that is really 'Wrong' in the way you had insisted.
What do 'you' mean by; "in the way you had insisted"?
What have I insisted? And, in what way, have I insisted 'that'?
Paradigmer wrote: ↑Thu Sep 10, 2020 5:38 pm
Your belief in the thing was so 'Wrong' as insisted on others despite thing is the way as it 'REALLY IS', contradicts your view on what you had professed as 'But this is ALL part of the BEAUTY of what is being Created, and what is about to come.'
You appear to NOT YET BE AWARE of this, but I neither believe nor disbelieve ANY thing. Therefore, I have NO belief/s. So, when you start by mentioning "your belief", in regards to me, you start out wrong and incorrect.
Now, what is the 'thing', which I had, supposedly, "insisted on others" was so 'Wrong'?
I think you might be ASSUMING just a bit, or quite a bit, to much here.
Did I EVER say the 'thing' was so 'Wrong'?
If yes, then it would be very easy and simple for you to point us to WHERE I said this.
Paradigmer wrote: ↑Thu Sep 10, 2020 5:38 pm
Age wrote: ↑Thu Sep 10, 2020 1:36 pm
What does the word 'paradoxical' mean, exactly, in the title, "The paradoxical effect of the cosmos"?
And, what does the word 'cosmos' refer to exactly, in that title?
As mentioned, you can visit my thread where there is a link to my web page on "
The paradoxical effect of the cosmos" to check on its dictionary definitions. And you can also look up at the 'Glossary' section if you want a more specific definition 'in the title' of the topic. Your questions for the two terminologies are self-explanatory there, if still not satisfied you can also skim through the content and should be able to grasp their explicit meanings in between the lines. Every term there was defined as much as could be despite that was not always possible, and also the limitations with words are indeed quite a hinder on the eliminations of ambiguities for being specific by definition, but most readers looked hard enough should be able to get its drift.
If you could not be bother to answer these questions directly here, in this forum, then I could not be bothered to read multiple words, and maybe multiple pages, just to find what you are alluding to, which could have just been very easily written here. In fact to answer my very simple questions could probably be done in less words that you actually wrote to tell me to go look for those answers yourself by trawling through texts somewhere else.
Paradigmer wrote: ↑Thu Sep 10, 2020 5:38 pm
As per se, agreeing or not to what you read is another matter, but please don't analyze until you become mentally paralyzed and inflict the paralysis on others as well; no statement could be absolutely perfect and of course some could be so wrong even on its own premises.
Will you provide examples?
Paradigmer wrote: ↑Thu Sep 10, 2020 5:38 pm
Also, everyone is at their different stages on multifarious levels for their learning process be it right or wrong, and no one sharing their point of view openly really owes you any explanation for their living on what you think as ought to be from your point of view.
Well you appear to have what I have been saying COMPLETELY and UTTERLY MIXED UP and WRONG.
Paradigmer wrote: ↑Thu Sep 10, 2020 5:38 pm
And 'understanding HOW to differentiate between' the objective reality of the cosmos, and the nature of reality is 'just one more thing to learn, in Life'.
Already achieved, and VERY EASILY DONE.
Paradigmer wrote: ↑Thu Sep 10, 2020 5:38 pm
There is no absolute truth in the nature of reality. And William Blakes knew this so well:
“Truth can never be told so as to be understood, and not to be believ'd”
Is this an absolute truth? Or, is this just ANOTHER one of those comments, which are NOT absolutely true at all?
See, EVERY time some one 'tries' to say, or explain, that there is NO absolute truth, then they have to admit that what they are saying, or explaining, is NOT absolutely true at all, either.
Paradigmer wrote: ↑Thu Sep 10, 2020 5:38 pm
You are most welcome to post your questions on this topic in the thread I had started there; let's not saturate this thread with off topic discussions. But in the events if I could not wrap my head around any issue I might not be responding at all or in a timely manner as of demands.
Have you started a thread in this forum, on that topic?
If no, then why not?
Also, why do you like to mention 'that' topic, with so many links to that different, not secure, website?