Defunding Police

[Sculptor]

https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/07/ ... shootings/

https://www.pnas.org/content/116/32/15877

"Similarly, Black and Hispanic officers (compared with White officers) were more likely to fatally shoot Black and Hispanic civilians. This does not mean that there are department policies encouraging non-White officers to fatally shoot minorities. Rather, the link between officer race and FOIS appears to be explained by officers and civilians being drawn from the same population, making it more likely that an officer will be exposed to (and fatally shoot) a same-race civilian."

do your own research

-Imp

This is a croc of fake bullshit.
Since the white population of the USA is 73% WHITE, then one would expect more whites to be killed by police than others.
There ought to be only 12% of shootings of black people, since that is the %age of blacks in the USA.
Sadly it is far more than that.
If there was racial equality yo umight expect there to be a similar amount of whites in prison.
But no the white population of gaol is not 73% but 24%; and the black prison population is not 12% but 34%.

white now make up less than your claim - its around 60 percent of so - its not clear, due to most (all really) demographic changes in America are due to Latinos (who are mostly mixed (Mestizo (Amer Indian/White mix), then white (75/25)- not many black latinos (2? percent or so), but a few).

the projection is that by 2040 "Whites will be a majority minority" whatever that means.

it means Trumpers go their panties in a bunch over Obama, and now fear non-WASPS - anyone that is not a WASP is not white to them -so an Italian or Spanard (both white of course), Catholic!!!!!!!!!!! is not "white".

Mexican? including the blond? - "she's a Catholic isn't she" - not white either!

IMO that 2040 date is a Trumper date, 25-percent of Latinos are white - the rest are not black nor american indian - they are mixed.

so IMO that date is more like probably 2300 or so before "whites" - both Cathoiic white Mexicans and WASP American Whites will not longer be the majory in America is the more accurate timeline.

America's obsession with race will not lead to a sense of equality. If everytime you fill out a form you are forced to give them your assessment of your "ethnicity" - what ever the fuck that means, all you are doing is being made to think of yourself as black or white.
People have to be treated equally if we are to get harmony.
"White" does not say anything about me.
And "black" should not say anything about anyone else. The rast of the bollocks from "hispanic" to "asian" is just a sort of negative vanity.
Children of "mixed backgrounds" are left wanting for identity.
I sat fuck identity. I am not part of your racial prejudice.

[gaffo]

This is a croc of fake bullshit.
Since the white population of the USA is 73% WHITE, then one would expect more whites to be killed by police than others.
There ought to be only 12% of shootings of black people, since that is the %age of blacks in the USA.
Sadly it is far more than that.
If there was racial equality yo umight expect there to be a similar amount of whites in prison.
But no the white population of gaol is not 73% but 24%; and the black prison population is not 12% but 34%.

white now make up less than your claim - its around 60 percent of so - its not clear, due to most (all really) demographic changes in America are due to Latinos (who are mostly mixed (Mestizo (Amer Indian/White mix), then white (75/25)- not many black latinos (2? percent or so), but a few).

the projection is that by 2040 "Whites will be a majority minority" whatever that means.

it means Trumpers go their panties in a bunch over Obama, and now fear non-WASPS - anyone that is not a WASP is not white to them -so an Italian or Spanard (both white of course), Catholic!!!!!!!!!!! is not "white".

Mexican? including the blond? - "she's a Catholic isn't she" - not white either!

IMO that 2040 date is a Trumper date, 25-percent of Latinos are white - the rest are not black nor american indian - they are mixed.

so IMO that date is more like probably 2300 or so before "whites" - both Cathoiic white Mexicans and WASP American Whites will not longer be the majory in America is the more accurate timeline.

America's obsession with race will not lead to a sense of equality. If everytime you fill out a form you are forced to give them your assessment of your "ethnicity" - what ever the fuck that means, all you are doing is being made to think of yourself as black or white.
People have to be treated equally if we are to get harmony.
"White" does not say anything about me.
And "black" should not say anything about anyone else. The rast of the bollocks from "hispanic" to "asian" is just a sort of negative vanity.
Children of "mixed backgrounds" are left wanting for identity.
I sat fuck identity. I am not part of your racial prejudice.

American was a racist society up to 1970 or so - after than we nearly forgot about race - and instead were what i am (and was back then (I have not changed, others have though) - i ignore race and support the melting pot concept -a color blind society).

sadly Identitiy Politics first showed up as Political Correctness in the late 80's and has only gotten worse and more fanatical and exclusionary, and is the opposite of championing our common humanity and similarities (99-percent the same) - they fixate on the 1-pecent instead.

BTW races are just black squirrel / brown squirrel - both squirrels (so no big deal).

[nothing]

The entire 'defund the police' movement is but one component of Islamic jihad.
The entire 'death to America' sentiment is Islamic - the political Left is owned/operated by Islam.
The "Deep State" and/or real "invisible enemy" is the House of Islam who religiously divides the world
on the basis of "believer vs. unbeliever" viz. "us vs. them" and will never stop.

Their greatest fear: the world learns who the real book-worshiping "Jews" are who divide/destroy the world.
Scapegoating their own crimes onto "Jews" has been their 1400-year strategy (and it still works).

[Sculptor]

The entire 'defund the police' movement is but one component of Islamic jihad.

Stupid moron.

[vegetariantaxidermy]

The entire 'defund the police' movement is but one component of Islamic jihad.

Stupid moron.

Tautology: ''A tautology is an expression or phrase that says the same thing twice, just in a different way. For this reason, a tautology is usually undesirable, as it can make you sound wordier than you need to be, and make you appear foolish.''

[Gary Childress]

Hmm. Maybe a bit like calling someone a "shit-turd" or a "dick-penis" or something. However, when you're really foot-stomping angry, sometimes it just takes more than that one expletive to really capture the feeling in a way that adequately inflicts the desired amount of emotional pain, I suppose.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[Sculptor]

The entire 'defund the police' movement is but one component of Islamic jihad.

Stupid moron.

Tautology: ''A tautology is an expression or phrase that says the same thing twice, just in a different way. For this reason, a tautology is usually undesirable, as it can make you sound wordier than you need to be, and make you appear foolish.''

I don't give a flying F^ck what you think.

[vegetariantaxidermy]

Stupid moron.

Tautology: ''A tautology is an expression or phrase that says the same thing twice, just in a different way. For this reason, a tautology is usually undesirable, as it can make you sound wordier than you need to be, and make you appear foolish.''

I don't give a flying F^ck what you think.

Oh shut up be quiet you porky fattie.

[Sculptor]

Hmm. Maybe a bit like calling someone a "shit-turd" or a "dick-penis" or something. However, when you're really foot-stomping angry, sometimes it just takes more than that one expletive to really capture the feeling in a way that adequately inflicts the desired amount of emotional pain, I suppose.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Indeed.
And Veggietax. Is a total C*nt-hole

[nothing]

The entire 'defund the police' movement is but one component of Islamic jihad.

Stupid moron.

Lol we know you are - it is called drawing from your own nature
and scapegoating it onto others because one can not account
for their own internal state of being (Cain, tiller of the soil).
This same condition underlies the general pathology of Islam:
"believers" can not account for their own actions.

The same is the original sin wherein Adam could not account for his
such to blame the woman (and god) for his own eating of the tree.
This blaming of women reflects in the hijab/niqab/burqa such to be
'truth in plain sight' lest one deny the reality, the same needed
to "believe" Islam is a religion of "peace" rather than perpetual conflict
viz. "believer vs. unbeliever". Kill the unbeliever! Kill the unbeliever!
Meanwhile: it takes a "believer" to "believe" themselves superior to others
and/or others are inferior to themselves. What side are all Nazis pinned on?

"Believers"

Book-worshiping "Jews" divide the world, indeed. The problem is
Muhammadans can not see the book-worshiping "Jew" that is
inside of themselves, as that is where the "Jew" really is.

Those who can not account for their own internal state of being
will pathologically project their own internal state of being
as if outside of themselves. This is how scapegoating works
and the modus operandi of Islam, rooted in the inability
to account for one's own actions, the original sin.

Don't the Muhammadans accuse "Jews" of being "pigs"?
Could they be drawing from their own nature? Lol.

[Sculptor]

The entire 'defund the police' movement is but one component of Islamic jihad.

Stupid moron.

Lol we know you are - it is called drawing from your own nature
and scapegoating it onto others because one can not account
for their own internal state of being (Cain, tiller of the soil).
This same condition underlies the general pathology of Islam:
"believers" can not account for their own actions.

The same is the original sin wherein Adam could not account for his
such to blame the woman (and god) for his own eating of the tree.
This blaming of women reflects in the hijab/niqab/burqa such to be
'truth in plain sight' lest one deny the reality, the same needed
to "believe" Islam is a religion of "peace" rather than perpetual conflict
viz. "believer vs. unbeliever". Kill the unbeliever! Kill the unbeliever!
Meanwhile: it takes a "believer" to "believe" themselves superior to others
and/or others are inferior to themselves. What side are all Nazis pinned on?

"Believers"

Book-worshiping "Jews" divide the world, indeed. The problem is
Muhammadans can not see the book-worshiping "Jew" that is
inside of themselves, as that is where the "Jew" really is.

Those who can not account for their own internal state of being
will pathologically project their own internal state of being
as if outside of themselves. This is how scapegoating works
and the modus operandi of Islam, rooted in the inability
to account for one's own actions, the original sin.

Don't the Muhammadans accuse "Jews" of being "pigs"?
Could they be drawing from their own nature? Lol.

Please refer to the remarks I made about you earlier.
Just to add stupid racist moron.

[vegetariantaxidermy]

Hmm. Maybe a bit like calling someone a "shit-turd" or a "dick-penis" or something. However, when you're really foot-stomping angry, sometimes it just takes more than that one expletive to really capture the feeling in a way that adequately inflicts the desired amount of emotional pain, I suppose.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Indeed.
And Veggietax. Is a total C*nt-hole

A perfect example of how vicious and hypocritical the wokies truly are. The vilest of the vile. Deflection and projection all the way.

[vegetariantaxidermy]

Stupid moron.

Lol we know you are - it is called drawing from your own nature
and scapegoating it onto others because one can not account
for their own internal state of being (Cain, tiller of the soil).
This same condition underlies the general pathology of Islam:
"believers" can not account for their own actions.

The same is the original sin wherein Adam could not account for his
such to blame the woman (and god) for his own eating of the tree.
This blaming of women reflects in the hijab/niqab/burqa such to be
'truth in plain sight' lest one deny the reality, the same needed
to "believe" Islam is a religion of "peace" rather than perpetual conflict
viz. "believer vs. unbeliever". Kill the unbeliever! Kill the unbeliever!
Meanwhile: it takes a "believer" to "believe" themselves superior to others
and/or others are inferior to themselves. What side are all Nazis pinned on?

"Believers"

Book-worshiping "Jews" divide the world, indeed. The problem is
Muhammadans can not see the book-worshiping "Jew" that is
inside of themselves, as that is where the "Jew" really is.

Those who can not account for their own internal state of being
will pathologically project their own internal state of being
as if outside of themselves. This is how scapegoating works
and the modus operandi of Islam, rooted in the inability
to account for one's own actions, the original sin.

Don't the Muhammadans accuse "Jews" of being "pigs"?
Could they be drawing from their own nature? Lol.

Please refer to the remarks I made about you earlier.
Just to add stupid racist moron.

'Deflection and projection'....

[nothing]

Please refer to the remarks I made about you earlier.

The remarks you made about me are a projection of your own internal state of being.
The same is true with 'stupid racist moron' as
only a stupid moron can possibly "believe"
that Islam is a race, let alone a religion.

Dividing humanity on the basis of "believer vs. unbeliever"
defeats the purpose of any religion: to reunite. Rather,
Islam is a globalist political entity who, like the "Jews",
worship a single book and emulate male central figure idol,
the idol of Islam happening to have been a male central figure
orator warlord, who amassed power via public oration,
weaponized the state against his political adversaries,
expanded militarily while signing/breaking "peace" treaties
and subsequently used the power of the state to commit
mass organized genocide against those he considered "Jews".

Who did I just describe? Adolph Hitler, or the idol of Islam, Muhammad?

Take your pick - they are reflections of one another
because Islam establishes the precedent for Nazism,
being the very root of it.

As such it is very easy to see who the Nazi-sympathizers are:
those who protect/defend Islam. The same are those, like the Muhammadan,
who can not account for their own actions, rather pathologically use others
as their own scapegoat, hence their need to till from their own soils
what they are themselves guilty of.

Just to add stupid racist moron.

The accuser is the accused.

What else do you have buried down there?

'Deflection and projection'....

Yes - this is the same underlying pathology of Islam,
the real book-worshiping "Jews" who can not account
for their own actions such to project the same onto others.
"Islamophobia" is one such institutionalized example
designed to silence/suppress/harass/slander those
who know the House of Islam is a House of Abuse.

[Sculptor]

Please refer to the remarks I made about you earlier.

The remarks you made about me are a projection of your own internal state of being.
The same is true with 'stupid racist moron' as
only a stupid moron can possibly "believe"
that Islam is a race, let alone a religion.

Dividing humanity on the basis of "believer vs. unbeliever"
defeats the purpose of any religion: to reunite. Rather,
Islam is a globalist political entity who, like the "Jews",
worship a single book and emulate male central figure idols,
the idol of Islam happening to have been a male central figure
orator warlord, who amassed power via public oration,
weaponized the state against his political adversaries,
expanded militarily while signing/breaking "peace" treaties
and subsequently used the power of the state to commit
mass organized genocide against who he considered "Jews".

Who did I just describe? Adolph Hitler, or the idol of Islam, Muhammad?

Take your pick - they are reflections of one another
because Islam establishes the precedent for Nazism,
being the very root of it.

As such it is very easy to see who the Nazi-sympathizers are:
those who protect/defend Islam. The same are those, like the Muhammadan,
who can not account for their own actions, rather pathologically use others
as their own scapegoat, hence their need to till from their own soils
what they are themselves guilty of.

Just to add stupid racist moron.

The accuser is the accused.

What else do you have buried down there?

PLONK!