Nick_A wrote: ↑Fri Jun 19, 2020 5:13 pm
RC, Henry gets it. The valuable commodity people were willing to sacrifice to the Gods are young virgins. This same commodity are young virgins who receive cash from those who own them including themselves. Either way a valuable human commodity is exchanged for another good; either security or cash.
No, neither you are Henry, "get it."
Human trafficking is not in any way the equivalent of superstitious ritualistic human sacrifice to appease Gods. The thread is about religion, not social corruption.
Money is not a God to be appeased, money is an objective to be acquired. Henry confuses fiat (government) money with real money, the medium of exchange and storage of wealth. Gold, or any other stable real commodity, can be used as money.
I continue to wait for just one real example of art actually making anyone aware of any value, or providing insight (peek behind the curtain).
I understand perfectly well the point you were trying to make, Nick, but is was irrelevant to my point about religious ritual, which was, that no religious ritual actually served to improve life, as Belinda claimed. I said:
Perhaps in the worlds of sword & sorcery fantasy there might be such a things, but there was never anything like that in the history of this world. Unless you consider the pagan rituals of medicine men and tribal spiritual leaders, like sacrificing young virgin girls to their Gods to insure a good harvest, there was never any such thing as you describe.
What you wrote in no way addresses the fact that no religious rituals ever made life better.