Does insanity have any responsibility?

Lacewing · Post by **Lacewing** » Mon May 04, 2020 7:41 pm

Insanity is demonstrated by forms of extremism.

So, I wonder, ASIDE from the most extreme and diagnosed forms of having an incapacitating mental disorder:

Is insanity an excuse to not care about ones effect on humankind or life?

Does insanity disregard having honor for truth and honesty?

Is insanity a rejection of ALL (oneself, others, life, love, connection, ALL)?

Such attitudes seem to be present in those who rage against the inferiority of the world, while proclaiming themselves to be above it. Yet their extremism has cracks that cannot stand up to honest, sane examination... so they dive deeper into the murky depths of their insanity, spewing up rancid bubbles, rather than bravely and responsibly facing what is illuminated in the Sun.

Does a person have any responsibility to life and everything else in it, through what they make/allow of themselves? Is insanity a claim of being a victim... rather than being a responsible part of ALL?

commonsense · Post by **commonsense** » Mon May 04, 2020 8:43 pm

Nicely put.

I regard insanity—not in a legal sense—as a break from reality. The wider the break, the deeper the insanity.

Putting an insane person in touch with reality is complex to say the least. I don’t think such a union can be made unless the insane person recognizes their detachment and wants to close the gap.

Insanity, however it comes to be, doesn’t seem to be under the control of its victim. As such, I cannot hold the insane liable for their behavior, verbal or otherwise.

While it is readily demonstrable that not all teeth are adorned with blue polka dots, there may be an insane person who claims this as reality.

I can only proceed in the reality that most people accept. I can only attempt to converse with those people. I cannot cure crazy.

Impenitent · Post by **Impenitent** » Tue May 05, 2020 1:25 am

insanity...

having someone else make your decisions for you...

your un-elected government bureaucrats know what is best for society...

obey

-Imp

Dontaskme · Post by **Dontaskme** » Wed May 06, 2020 10:24 am

Does the word '' FIRE '' hold itself accountable for burning every solid inflammable material object, which is pretty much just about everything, including iron, for even that can be melted to a liquid..all material returns to it's original state of empty nothingness.

Now, if you are referring to the ''fictional story'' a play made of words...which are also known as characters with associated meanings...who play out roles of being held accountable and responsible... then ask yourself, the one you think you are, what would you do? would you play with fire or would you leave it well alone?

The Responsibilty game, aka the fictional human story plays out quite automatically where every action / reaction, cause / effect dynamic occurs as an instantaneous sensibility response in the moment...and this happens quite effortlessly without no one aka you taking or playing any part of it...since characters are not real... if they were, then the word FIRE would be insane and locked up in an institution for ever and ever, because of it's heinous crimes against humanity.

Stupid is as stupid does, fortunately though, there is no one who is stupid here, there is only good old common senses, for being on constant stand by and for being loyal and trustworthy and reliable and persistent in their presence.. and for saving the life of the fictional character long before that great pretender tries to sink it's big sharp teeth into the mix, trying to get in on all the action, just so that it can fantasize about being a real action man hero.. which in reality only serves to hinder the real perfection that's already playing out and going LIVE right now..all by it's own little ownsome, all by itself, all ONE

Just some more WORD salad for you to chew on, food for thought, and I thank you in turn for this fish, as it does go rather nicely with a bit of salad don't you think? .

.

commonsense · Post by **commonsense** » Wed May 06, 2020 2:06 pm

Dontaskme wrote: ↑Wed May 06, 2020 10:24 am

Word salad. Loose connections. Schizoid.

.

Why?
.

Dontaskme · Post by **Dontaskme** » Wed May 06, 2020 2:12 pm

commonsense wrote: ↑Wed May 06, 2020 2:06 pm
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Wed May 06, 2020 10:24 am

Word salad. Loose connections. Schizoid.

.
Why?
.

who questions?

Luxin · Post by **Luxin** » Wed May 06, 2020 3:43 pm

deleted 478

commonsense · Post by **commonsense** » Wed May 06, 2020 3:58 pm

Dontaskme wrote: ↑Wed May 06, 2020 2:12 pm
commonsense wrote: ↑Wed May 06, 2020 2:06 pm
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Wed May 06, 2020 10:24 am

Word salad. Loose connections. Schizoid.

.
Why?
.
who questions?

QED

Dontaskme · Post by **Dontaskme** » Wed May 06, 2020 4:15 pm

commonsense wrote: ↑Wed May 06, 2020 3:58 pm
QED

There are no why or how answers.

Relatively speaking there can be answers, but not an absolutely absolute answer.

And since the relative is relative to nothing, there is absolutely no way the absolute truth about truth claims can be demonstated or show or proved.

commonsense · Post by **commonsense** » Wed May 06, 2020 4:24 pm

Dontaskme wrote: ↑Wed May 06, 2020 4:15 pm
commonsense wrote: ↑Wed May 06, 2020 3:58 pm
QED
There are no why or how answers.

Relatively speaking they can be answered, but not absolutely.

And since the relative is relative to nothing, there is absolutely no way the absolute truth about truth claims can be demonstated or show or proved.

QED
.

Dontaskme · Post by **Dontaskme** » Wed May 06, 2020 4:27 pm

commonsense wrote: ↑Wed May 06, 2020 4:24 pm
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Wed May 06, 2020 4:15 pm
commonsense wrote: ↑Wed May 06, 2020 3:58 pm
QED
There are no why or how answers.

Relatively speaking they can be answered, but not absolutely.

And since the relative is relative to nothing, there is absolutely no way the absolute truth about truth claims can be demonstated or show or proved.
QED
.

The devil is in the details.

Y because that's it's nature.

Frog / scorpion story.

Y bring up a story about nothing.

commonsense · Post by **commonsense** » Wed May 06, 2020 4:38 pm

Dontaskme wrote: ↑Wed May 06, 2020 4:27 pm
commonsense wrote: ↑Wed May 06, 2020 4:24 pm
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Wed May 06, 2020 4:15 pm

There are no why or how answers.

Relatively speaking they can be answered, but not absolutely.

And since the relative is relative to nothing, there is absolutely no way the absolute truth about truth claims can be demonstated or show or proved.
QED
.
The devil is in the details.

Y because that's it's nature.

Frog / scorpion story.

Y bring up a story about nothing.

Tangential thinking. Loose.....connections

.

Dontaskme · Post by **Dontaskme** » Wed May 06, 2020 4:49 pm

commonsense wrote: ↑Wed May 06, 2020 4:38 pm
Tangential thinking. Loose.....connections

.

No thinker = loose thoughts.

An electrician might be able to fix the problem of disconnected connectedness...but that's another story no one ever authored.

commonsense · Post by **commonsense** » Wed May 06, 2020 5:06 pm

Dontaskme wrote: ↑Wed May 06, 2020 4:49 pm
commonsense wrote: ↑Wed May 06, 2020 4:38 pm
Tangential thinking. Loose.....connections

.
No thinker = loose thoughts.

An electrician might be able to fix the problem of disconnected connectedness...but that's another story no one ever authored.

QED again!
.

Dontaskme · Post by **Dontaskme** » Wed May 06, 2020 5:27 pm

commonsense wrote: ↑Wed May 06, 2020 5:06 pm
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Wed May 06, 2020 4:49 pm
commonsense wrote: ↑Wed May 06, 2020 4:38 pm
Tangential thinking. Loose.....connections

.
No thinker = loose thoughts.

An electrician might be able to fix the problem of disconnected connectedness...but that's another story no one ever authored.
QED again!
.

Ok polly parrot, I get it, you really don't have to keep showing up to your own show, or do you like watching the same old repeats .. or is this really over and out now or just more repeats of repeats add infinito....I'll wait for the echo!

.

Philosophy Now Forum